Acute stress and blockade of mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptors: Effects on working memory

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neurobiology of Learning and Memory Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107986
{"title":"Acute stress and blockade of mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptors: Effects on working memory","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although early studies were able to demonstrate a negative impact of stress on working memory performance, present research findings are heterogeneous. Numerous further studies found no effects or even improved performance, with the direction of these stress effects likely depending on the underlying biological mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate receptor-specific effects, as part of the stress-induced cortisol response, on working memory performance. Healthy, male participants (N=318, mean age 25.4 ± 5.1y) were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), a social-evaluative stress manipulation, or a non-stress control condition after they had received either spironolactone (blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor, MR) or mifepristone (blockade of the glucocorticoid receptor, GR) or a placebo. Both substances are potent antagonists with high affinity for the respective receptors. To assess working memory, we implemented the n-back task subsequent to stress exposure, number of correct responses and reaction times served as outcome measures. We did not find effects of stress on working memory for any outcome measure, i.e. correct responses and reaction times. Yet, post hoc tests revealed that the group that received mifepristone exhibited longer reaction times under medium load conditions when compared to the placebo group, which might be an indication of the GR’s involvement in task performance. We conclude that working memory performance is not affected by acute stress, at least under these prevalent conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742724000972/pdfft?md5=c2dec4cbd8cf1ce4a9f04f0ddcba5c09&pid=1-s2.0-S1074742724000972-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742724000972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although early studies were able to demonstrate a negative impact of stress on working memory performance, present research findings are heterogeneous. Numerous further studies found no effects or even improved performance, with the direction of these stress effects likely depending on the underlying biological mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate receptor-specific effects, as part of the stress-induced cortisol response, on working memory performance. Healthy, male participants (N=318, mean age 25.4 ± 5.1y) were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), a social-evaluative stress manipulation, or a non-stress control condition after they had received either spironolactone (blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor, MR) or mifepristone (blockade of the glucocorticoid receptor, GR) or a placebo. Both substances are potent antagonists with high affinity for the respective receptors. To assess working memory, we implemented the n-back task subsequent to stress exposure, number of correct responses and reaction times served as outcome measures. We did not find effects of stress on working memory for any outcome measure, i.e. correct responses and reaction times. Yet, post hoc tests revealed that the group that received mifepristone exhibited longer reaction times under medium load conditions when compared to the placebo group, which might be an indication of the GR’s involvement in task performance. We conclude that working memory performance is not affected by acute stress, at least under these prevalent conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性应激和阻断矿物质皮质激素或糖皮质激素受体:对工作记忆的影响
虽然早期的研究能够证明压力对工作记忆能力有负面影响,但目前的研究结果却不尽相同。许多进一步的研究发现,压力对工作记忆能力没有影响,甚至还能提高工作记忆能力,而这些压力效应的方向可能取决于潜在的生物机制。本研究的目的是调查受体特异性对工作记忆能力的影响,这是压力引起的皮质醇反应的一部分。健康男性参与者(318人,25.4 ± 5.1岁)在接受了螺内酯(阻断矿质皮质激素受体,MR)或米非司酮(阻断糖皮质激素受体,GR)或安慰剂后,接受了特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)(一种社会评价压力操作)或非压力控制条件。这两种物质都是强效拮抗剂,对各自的受体具有很高的亲和力。为了评估工作记忆,我们在应激暴露后执行了n-back任务,以正确反应次数和反应时间作为结果测量指标。在正确反应和反应时间这两项结果测量中,我们都没有发现压力对工作记忆的影响。然而,事后测试表明,与安慰剂组相比,接受米非司酮治疗的一组在中等负荷条件下的反应时间更长,这可能表明GR参与了任务的执行。我们的结论是,工作记忆能力不会受到急性应激的影响,至少在这些普遍条件下是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
期刊最新文献
Long-term memory formation for voices during sleep in three-month-old infants Cue-potentiated feeding in rodents: Implications for weight regulation in obesogenic environments Valence-dependent dopaminergic modulation during reversal learning in Parkinson’s disease: A neurocomputational approach Acute stress and blockade of mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptors: Effects on working memory Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1