Glass ceiling, sticky floor, or both? Public and private sector differences in Türkiye

IF 1 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Metroeconomica Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1111/meca.12481
Fernando Rios‐Avila, Ayça Özekin, Fulden Komuryakan
{"title":"Glass ceiling, sticky floor, or both? Public and private sector differences in Türkiye","authors":"Fernando Rios‐Avila, Ayça Özekin, Fulden Komuryakan","doi":"10.1111/meca.12481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the glass ceiling and sticky floor phenomena within the contexts of both the public and private sectors in Türkiye, while exploring sector‐specific differences. To do this, we use a recentered influence function‐based decomposition method to analyze data from the Household Labor Force Statistics spanning from 2014 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sticky floor effect emerges as more prominent in the private sector, contrasting with the public sector where the glass ceiling effect holds greater sway. Additionally, our analysis reveals that gender discrimination appears to be more prevalent in the private sector, although it exhibits an increasing trend in the public sector. The evidence suggests a need for further research on the gender wage gap in Türkiye, especially within the context of the glass ceiling and sticky floor effects. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering a comprehensive examination of these phenomena in both public and private sectors, leveraging the availability of recent data and advancements in methodologies.","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the glass ceiling and sticky floor phenomena within the contexts of both the public and private sectors in Türkiye, while exploring sector‐specific differences. To do this, we use a recentered influence function‐based decomposition method to analyze data from the Household Labor Force Statistics spanning from 2014 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sticky floor effect emerges as more prominent in the private sector, contrasting with the public sector where the glass ceiling effect holds greater sway. Additionally, our analysis reveals that gender discrimination appears to be more prevalent in the private sector, although it exhibits an increasing trend in the public sector. The evidence suggests a need for further research on the gender wage gap in Türkiye, especially within the context of the glass ceiling and sticky floor effects. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering a comprehensive examination of these phenomena in both public and private sectors, leveraging the availability of recent data and advancements in methodologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃天花板、粘稠地板,还是两者兼而有之?土耳其公共部门和私营部门的差异
本研究探讨了土耳其公共部门和私营部门中的玻璃天花板和粘滞地板现象,同时探索了具体部门的差异。为此,我们使用基于重定向影响函数的分解方法,分析了从 2014 年到 2021 年的家庭劳动力统计数据。我们的研究结果表明,在私营部门,"粘性下限 "效应更为突出,而在公共部门,"玻璃天花板 "效应则更具影响力。此外,我们的分析还显示,性别歧视似乎在私营部门更为普遍,但在公共部门却呈现出增长趋势。这些证据表明,有必要进一步研究土耳其的性别工资差距,尤其是在玻璃天花板效应和粘性地板效应的背景下。本研究利用最新数据和先进方法,对公共部门和私营部门的这些现象进行了全面研究,为现有文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metroeconomica
Metroeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Partially funded social security and growth Testing the theory of the firm under price and background risk Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US Using input‐output data to model the structure of export linkages in global value chains: A Brazil case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1