Constitutional landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic rights by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. pp.296. 978-3-030-55574-0 (hardcover)
{"title":"Constitutional landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic rights by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. pp.296. 978-3-030-55574-0 (hardcover)","authors":"Firman Pranoto, Runy Rusdyantinah Indrawaty, Triadika Nugraha, Jumriani Sultan, Zafrullah Zafrullah","doi":"10.1007/s10602-024-09446-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The book “Constitutional Landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic Rights” by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel offers an in-depth analysis of the role of the United States Supreme Court in shaping legal policy through a series of landmark decisions. The book examines a number of turning-point cases in American legal history, focusing on three key concepts: separation of powers, federalism, and economic rights. Through analyses of cases such as Bowsher v. Synar, Morrison v. Olson, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Lochner v. New York, the author explores how the Supreme Court navigates constitutional boundaries and upholds fundamental principles that shape the country’s legal framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":44897,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-024-09446-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The book “Constitutional Landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic Rights” by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel offers an in-depth analysis of the role of the United States Supreme Court in shaping legal policy through a series of landmark decisions. The book examines a number of turning-point cases in American legal history, focusing on three key concepts: separation of powers, federalism, and economic rights. Through analyses of cases such as Bowsher v. Synar, Morrison v. Olson, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Lochner v. New York, the author explores how the Supreme Court navigates constitutional boundaries and upholds fundamental principles that shape the country’s legal framework.
宪法里程碑:Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 合著的《最高法院关于分权、联邦制和经济权利的裁决》。瑞士:Palgrave Macmillan.2021. pp.296.978-3-030-55574-0 (精装)
Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 合著的《宪法地标:Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 所著的《宪法地标:最高法院关于三权分立、联邦主义和经济权利的判决》一书深入分析了美国最高法院通过一系列具有里程碑意义的判决在制定法律政策方面所发挥的作用。该书研究了美国法律史上一些具有转折意义的案例,重点关注三个关键概念:三权分立、联邦主义和经济权利。通过对 Bowsher v. Synar、Morrison v. Olson、Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 和 Lochner v. New York 等案件的分析,作者探讨了最高法院如何驾驭宪法界限,维护塑造国家法律框架的基本原则。
期刊介绍:
Constitutional Political Economy is a forum for research in the broad area of constitutional analysis, which lies at the intersection of several approaches in modern economics, sharing a common interest in the systematic integration of the institutional dimension - the study of political, legal and moral institutions - into economic analysis.
While its primary discipline is economics, Constitutional Political Economy is explicitly interdisciplinary, aiming to encourage an exchange between the various social sciences, including law, philosophy, political science and sociology. Theoretical and empirical research, as well as contributions to constitutional policy issues, are considered for publication.
Officially cited as: Const Polit Econ