Constitutional landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic rights by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. pp.296. 978-3-030-55574-0 (hardcover)

Firman Pranoto, Runy Rusdyantinah Indrawaty, Triadika Nugraha, Jumriani Sultan, Zafrullah Zafrullah
{"title":"Constitutional landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic rights by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. pp.296. 978-3-030-55574-0 (hardcover)","authors":"Firman Pranoto, Runy Rusdyantinah Indrawaty, Triadika Nugraha, Jumriani Sultan, Zafrullah Zafrullah","doi":"10.1007/s10602-024-09446-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The book “Constitutional Landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic Rights” by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel offers an in-depth analysis of the role of the United States Supreme Court in shaping legal policy through a series of landmark decisions. The book examines a number of turning-point cases in American legal history, focusing on three key concepts: separation of powers, federalism, and economic rights. Through analyses of cases such as Bowsher v. Synar, Morrison v. Olson, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Lochner v. New York, the author explores how the Supreme Court navigates constitutional boundaries and upholds fundamental principles that shape the country’s legal framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":44897,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-024-09446-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The book “Constitutional Landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic Rights” by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel offers an in-depth analysis of the role of the United States Supreme Court in shaping legal policy through a series of landmark decisions. The book examines a number of turning-point cases in American legal history, focusing on three key concepts: separation of powers, federalism, and economic rights. Through analyses of cases such as Bowsher v. Synar, Morrison v. Olson, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Lochner v. New York, the author explores how the Supreme Court navigates constitutional boundaries and upholds fundamental principles that shape the country’s legal framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法里程碑:Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 合著的《最高法院关于分权、联邦制和经济权利的裁决》。瑞士:Palgrave Macmillan.2021. pp.296.978-3-030-55574-0 (精装)
Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 合著的《宪法地标:Charles M. Lamb 和 Jacob R. Neiheisel 所著的《宪法地标:最高法院关于三权分立、联邦主义和经济权利的判决》一书深入分析了美国最高法院通过一系列具有里程碑意义的判决在制定法律政策方面所发挥的作用。该书研究了美国法律史上一些具有转折意义的案例,重点关注三个关键概念:三权分立、联邦主义和经济权利。通过对 Bowsher v. Synar、Morrison v. Olson、Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 和 Lochner v. New York 等案件的分析,作者探讨了最高法院如何驾驭宪法界限,维护塑造国家法律框架的基本原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Constitutional Political Economy is a forum for research in the broad area of constitutional analysis, which lies at the intersection of several approaches in modern economics, sharing a common interest in the systematic integration of the institutional dimension - the study of political, legal and moral institutions - into economic analysis. While its primary discipline is economics, Constitutional Political Economy is explicitly interdisciplinary, aiming to encourage an exchange between the various social sciences, including law, philosophy, political science and sociology. Theoretical and empirical research, as well as contributions to constitutional policy issues, are considered for publication. Officially cited as: Const Polit Econ
期刊最新文献
Constitutional landmarks: Supreme Court Decisions on Separation of Powers, Federalism, and Economic rights by Charles M. Lamb and Jacob R. Neiheisel. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 2021. pp.296. 978-3-030-55574-0 (hardcover) Election campaign finance bans and corruption: effectiveness across parliamentary and presidential democracies The Italian Constitutional Court and recentralization along the pendulum of regionalism Non-compliance as a determinant of constitutional change? A comparative study Constitutional artisans: James Buchanan and Vincent Ostrom on artifactual man, the constitutional attitude, and the political economy of constitutional design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1