Comparison and Verification of Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar and Radiosonde Data in the Beijing Urban Area

IF 6.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s00376-024-3240-9
Zexu Luo, Xiaoquan Song, Jiaping Yin, Zhichao Bu, Yubao Chen, Yongtao Yu, Zhenlu Zhang
{"title":"Comparison and Verification of Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar and Radiosonde Data in the Beijing Urban Area","authors":"Zexu Luo, Xiaoquan Song, Jiaping Yin, Zhichao Bu, Yubao Chen, Yongtao Yu, Zhenlu Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00376-024-3240-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a new type of wind field detection equipment, coherent Doppler wind lidar (CDWL) still needs more relevant observation experiments to compare and verify whether it can achieve the accuracy and precision of traditional observation equipment in urban areas. In this experiment, a self-developed CDWL provided four months of observations in the southern Beijing area. After the data acquisition time and height match, the wind profile data obtained based on a Doppler beam swinging (DBS) five-beam inversion algorithm were compared with radiosonde data released from the same location. The standard deviation (SD) of wind speed is 0.8 m s<sup>−1</sup>, and the coefficient of determination <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> is 0.95. The SD of the wind direction is 17.7° with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.96. Below the height of the roughness sublayer (about 400 m), the error in wind speed and wind direction is significantly greater than the error above the height of the boundary layer (about 1500 m). For the case of wind speeds less than 4 m s<sup>−1</sup>, the error of wind direction is more significant and is affected by the distribution of surrounding buildings. Averaging at different height levels using suitable time windows can effectively reduce the effects of turbulence and thus reduce the error caused by the different measurement methods of the two devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7249,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-024-3240-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a new type of wind field detection equipment, coherent Doppler wind lidar (CDWL) still needs more relevant observation experiments to compare and verify whether it can achieve the accuracy and precision of traditional observation equipment in urban areas. In this experiment, a self-developed CDWL provided four months of observations in the southern Beijing area. After the data acquisition time and height match, the wind profile data obtained based on a Doppler beam swinging (DBS) five-beam inversion algorithm were compared with radiosonde data released from the same location. The standard deviation (SD) of wind speed is 0.8 m s−1, and the coefficient of determination R2 is 0.95. The SD of the wind direction is 17.7° with an R2 of 0.96. Below the height of the roughness sublayer (about 400 m), the error in wind speed and wind direction is significantly greater than the error above the height of the boundary layer (about 1500 m). For the case of wind speeds less than 4 m s−1, the error of wind direction is more significant and is affected by the distribution of surrounding buildings. Averaging at different height levels using suitable time windows can effectively reduce the effects of turbulence and thus reduce the error caused by the different measurement methods of the two devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北京城区相干多普勒风激光雷达和无线电探空仪数据的比较与验证
相干多普勒风激光雷达(CDWL)作为一种新型风场探测设备,其在城市地区的观测精度和准确度能否达到传统观测设备的水平,还需要更多相关观测实验的对比和验证。在本实验中,自主研发的相干多普勒风激光雷达在北京南部地区进行了为期四个月的观测。在数据采集时间和高度匹配后,基于多普勒波束摆动(DBS)五波束反演算法获得的风廓线数据与同一地点发布的无线电探空仪数据进行了比较。风速的标准偏差(SD)为 0.8 m s-1,判定系数 R2 为 0.95。风向的标准偏差为 17.7°,判定系数 R2 为 0.96。在粗糙度子层高度以下(约 400 米),风速和风向的误差明显大于边界层高度以上(约 1500 米)的误差。在风速小于 4 m s-1 的情况下,风向误差更为显著,并受到周围建筑物分布的影响。利用合适的时间窗在不同高度层进行平均,可有效减小湍流的影响,从而减小两种设备不同测量方法造成的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
5.20%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, launched in 1984, aims to rapidly publish original scientific papers on the dynamics, physics and chemistry of the atmosphere and ocean. It covers the latest achievements and developments in the atmospheric sciences, including marine meteorology and meteorology-associated geophysics, as well as the theoretical and practical aspects of these disciplines. Papers on weather systems, numerical weather prediction, climate dynamics and variability, satellite meteorology, remote sensing, air chemistry and the boundary layer, clouds and weather modification, can be found in the journal. Papers describing the application of new mathematics or new instruments are also collected here.
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal Evaluation and Future Projection of Diurnal Temperature Range over the Tibetan Plateau in CMIP6 Models Enhanced Cooling Efficiency of Urban Trees on Hotter Summer Days in 70 Cities of China On the Optimal Initial Inner-Core Size for Tropical Cyclone Intensification: An Idealized Numerical Study Improving Satellite-Retrieved Cloud Base Height with Ground-Based Cloud Radar Measurements Effectiveness of Precursor Emission Reductions for the Control of Summertime Ozone and PM2.5 in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region under Different Meteorological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1