Appraising machine learning algorithms in predicting noise level and emissions from gasoline-powered household backup generators

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w
S. O. Giwa, C. N. Nwaokocha, O. M. Osifeko, B. O. Orogbade, R. T. Taziwa, N. Dyantyi, M. Sharifpur
{"title":"Appraising machine learning algorithms in predicting noise level and emissions from gasoline-powered household backup generators","authors":"S. O. Giwa, C. N. Nwaokocha, O. M. Osifeko, B. O. Orogbade, R. T. Taziwa, N. Dyantyi, M. Sharifpur","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine learning is presently receiving great attention. However, machine learning applications to gasoline engine research are limited. This paper investigated the implementation of various machine learning models in predicting the emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and noise levels of gasoline-powered household generators for the first time. Data of operating and installed capacity, efficiency (input) and emissions, and noise level (output) obtained from 166 generators were used in extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and polynomial regression (PNR) algorithms to develop predictive models. Results revealed high prediction performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377–1.0000) of these algorithms marked with very low errors. The implementation of PNR followed by the RF exhibited the best models for predicting CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and the noise level of generators. R<sup>2</sup> of 1.000 and 0.9979–0.9994, mean squared error of &lt; 10<sup>−6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>−5</sup>–8.6 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, mean absolute percentage error of 9.15 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–1.3 × 10<sup>−15</sup> and 7.1 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–8.1 × 10<sup>−2</sup>, and root mean squared error of 3.3 × 10<sup>−16</sup>–5.4 × 10<sup>−16</sup> and 4.4 × 10<sup>−3</sup>–9.3 × 10<sup>−2</sup> were recorded for all the output parameters using PNR and RF respectively. DT models had the least prediction capacity for CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, and noise levels (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9493–0.9592) while ANN produced the least performance for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9377). This study further strengthens machine learning applications in engine research for the prediction of various output parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05987-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning is presently receiving great attention. However, machine learning applications to gasoline engine research are limited. This paper investigated the implementation of various machine learning models in predicting the emissions (CO2, CO, and PM2.5) and noise levels of gasoline-powered household generators for the first time. Data of operating and installed capacity, efficiency (input) and emissions, and noise level (output) obtained from 166 generators were used in extreme gradient boosting, artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and polynomial regression (PNR) algorithms to develop predictive models. Results revealed high prediction performance (R2 = 0.9377–1.0000) of these algorithms marked with very low errors. The implementation of PNR followed by the RF exhibited the best models for predicting CO2, CO, PM2.5, and the noise level of generators. R2 of 1.000 and 0.9979–0.9994, mean squared error of < 10−6 and 2 × 10−5–8.6 × 10−5, mean absolute percentage error of 9.15 × 10−16–1.3 × 10−15 and 7.1 × 10−3–8.1 × 10−2, and root mean squared error of 3.3 × 10−16–5.4 × 10−16 and 4.4 × 10−3–9.3 × 10−2 were recorded for all the output parameters using PNR and RF respectively. DT models had the least prediction capacity for CO, CO2, and noise levels (R2 = 0.9493–0.9592) while ANN produced the least performance for PM2.5 (R2 = 0.9377). This study further strengthens machine learning applications in engine research for the prediction of various output parameters.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估机器学习算法在预测汽油驱动家用备用发电机噪音水平和排放方面的应用
目前,机器学习备受关注。然而,机器学习在汽油发动机研究中的应用还很有限。本文首次研究了各种机器学习模型在预测家用汽油发电机排放(二氧化碳、一氧化碳和 PM2.5)和噪声水平中的应用。对 166 台发电机的运行和装机容量、效率(输入)和排放以及噪声水平(输出)数据,采用极端梯度提升、人工神经网络(ANN)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)和多项式回归(PNR)算法来开发预测模型。结果显示,这些算法的预测性能高(R2 = 0.9377-1.0000),误差极小。在预测二氧化碳、一氧化碳、PM2.5 和发电机噪音水平方面,采用 PNR 算法和 RF 算法的模型效果最佳。使用 PNR 和 RF,所有输出参数的 R2 分别为 1.000 和 0.9979-0.9994,平均平方误差分别为 < 10-6 和 2 × 10-5-8.6 × 10-5,平均绝对百分比误差分别为 9.15 × 10-16-1.3 × 10-15 和 7.1 × 10-3-8.1 × 10-2,平均平方根误差分别为 3.3 × 10-16-5.4 × 10-16 和 4.4 × 10-3-9.3 × 10-2。DT 模型对 CO、CO2 和噪音水平的预测能力最低(R2 = 0.9493-0.9592),而 ANN 对 PM2.5 的预测能力最低(R2 = 0.9377)。这项研究进一步加强了机器学习在发动机研究中对各种输出参数预测的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
期刊最新文献
Solar power plant site selection using fuzzy inference system: a case study in Iran Methane emissions from rice paddies in the Yangtze River Delta region of China: synthesis of new estimates Tolerance and survival of native plants exposed to petroleum hydrocarbon-containing sludge: First step in phytoremediation Analyzing blockchain-based waste management investments in smart cities using quantum picture fuzzy rough modelling Synthesis and characterization of an eco-friendly nano-hybrid based on luteolin-loaded zinc-aluminum layered double hydroxide for biological applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1