{"title":"Artificial intelligence for science: The easy and hard problems","authors":"Ruairidh M. Battleday, Samuel J. Gershman","doi":"arxiv-2408.14508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A suite of impressive scientific discoveries have been driven by recent\nadvances in artificial intelligence. These almost all result from training\nflexible algorithms to solve difficult optimization problems specified in\nadvance by teams of domain scientists and engineers with access to large\namounts of data. Although extremely useful, this kind of problem solving only\ncorresponds to one part of science - the \"easy problem.\" The other part of\nscientific research is coming up with the problem itself - the \"hard problem.\"\nSolving the hard problem is beyond the capacities of current algorithms for\nscientific discovery because it requires continual conceptual revision based on\npoorly defined constraints. We can make progress on understanding how humans\nsolve the hard problem by studying the cognitive science of scientists, and\nthen use the results to design new computational agents that automatically\ninfer and update their scientific paradigms.","PeriodicalId":501517,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A suite of impressive scientific discoveries have been driven by recent
advances in artificial intelligence. These almost all result from training
flexible algorithms to solve difficult optimization problems specified in
advance by teams of domain scientists and engineers with access to large
amounts of data. Although extremely useful, this kind of problem solving only
corresponds to one part of science - the "easy problem." The other part of
scientific research is coming up with the problem itself - the "hard problem."
Solving the hard problem is beyond the capacities of current algorithms for
scientific discovery because it requires continual conceptual revision based on
poorly defined constraints. We can make progress on understanding how humans
solve the hard problem by studying the cognitive science of scientists, and
then use the results to design new computational agents that automatically
infer and update their scientific paradigms.