‘You take me for a moron or what’? Analysing French felony courts through legitimacy of justice and therapeutic jurisprudence lenses

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY European Journal of Probation Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1177/20662203241281023
Martine Herzog-Evans
{"title":"‘You take me for a moron or what’? Analysing French felony courts through legitimacy of justice and therapeutic jurisprudence lenses","authors":"Martine Herzog-Evans","doi":"10.1177/20662203241281023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"French literature pertaining to felony courts has used quantitative-descriptive or sociological critical approaches. It has portrayed an assembly line system where offenders are industrially processed. However, this literature has not documented the consequences this processing has on the interactions between the accused and judicial practitioners. This article attempts to bridge this gap. It analyses the felony hearings which took place during a year in the three chambers of a local court, by using a semi-ethnographic methodology. Data was coded with a legitimacy of justice-procedural justice-therapeutic jurisprudence (LJ-PJ-TJ) analytical grid. In the majority of cases, the interactions with the accused did not meet LJ-PJ-TJ criteria. French felony courts are noisy, summary, and dehumanised. However, there were interesting exceptions to this rule: the collegial chamber was significantly more respectful and dignified than the one-judge chamber; at an individual level, a strong minority of judges meet the majority of the LJ-PJ-TJ criteria.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203241281023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

French literature pertaining to felony courts has used quantitative-descriptive or sociological critical approaches. It has portrayed an assembly line system where offenders are industrially processed. However, this literature has not documented the consequences this processing has on the interactions between the accused and judicial practitioners. This article attempts to bridge this gap. It analyses the felony hearings which took place during a year in the three chambers of a local court, by using a semi-ethnographic methodology. Data was coded with a legitimacy of justice-procedural justice-therapeutic jurisprudence (LJ-PJ-TJ) analytical grid. In the majority of cases, the interactions with the accused did not meet LJ-PJ-TJ criteria. French felony courts are noisy, summary, and dehumanised. However, there were interesting exceptions to this rule: the collegial chamber was significantly more respectful and dignified than the one-judge chamber; at an individual level, a strong minority of judges meet the majority of the LJ-PJ-TJ criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你当我是白痴还是什么?从司法合法性和治疗法学角度分析法国重罪法庭
法国有关重罪法庭的文献采用了定量描述或社会学批判的方法。这些文献描绘了一个流水线系统,在这个系统中,罪犯被工业化地处理。然而,这些文献并未记录这种处理方式对被告与司法从业人员之间的互动所产生的后果。本文试图弥补这一不足。文章采用半人种学方法,分析了当地法院三个审判庭在一年内进行的重罪听证会。数据采用司法合法性-程序正义-治疗法学(LJ-PJ-TJ)分析网格进行编码。在大多数情况下,与被告的互动不符合 LJ-PJ-TJ 标准。法国重罪法庭嘈杂、简易、缺乏人性。不过,也有一些有趣的例外情况:合议庭明显比独任审判庭更加尊重和庄重;在个人层面,极少数法官符合 LJ-PJ-TJ 标准中的大多数标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Social reintegration of individuals convicted of terrorism in France: From paradox to blind spot? ‘You take me for a moron or what’? Analysing French felony courts through legitimacy of justice and therapeutic jurisprudence lenses Profile of men and women sentenced to community services: Risk factors and social vulnerability Enforcement of alternative measures to detention in EU countries: The Italian situation Preface to the special edition on the application of the principle of mutual trust in matters of prison and probation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1