The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1111/josi.12636
Emily A. Leskinen, Sharon G. Horne, William S. Ryan, Jojanneke van der Toorn
{"title":"The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research","authors":"Emily A. Leskinen, Sharon G. Horne, William S. Ryan, Jojanneke van der Toorn","doi":"10.1111/josi.12636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The open science (OS) movement has the potential to fundamentally shape how researchers conduct research and distribute findings. However, the implications for research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) experiences present unique considerations. In this paper, included in the special issue on <jats:italic>Reimagining LGBTIQ+ Research</jats:italic>, we explore how the OS movement broadens access to and comprehension of LGBTIQ+ experiences while simultaneously imposing limitations on the representation of these identities and raising concerns about risks to LGBTIQ+ researchers and participants. Our research focuses on three facets of the OS movement. First, we examine practices related to open data, which advocates that data should be accessible to other researchers to analyze. Yet, providing access to such data challenges may compromise trust between the research team and study participants. Second, we examine practices related to open replicable research, particularly as it has the potential to both highlight and erase the experiences of groups within the LGBTIQ+ community. Finally, we consider how open access, making scholarly articles free to the public, may help educate a broader audience on the lived experiences of LGBTIQ+ people, but in regions where these identities remain heavily stigmatized and/or criminalized, access may be blocked or individuals could be penalized for retrieving this information.","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The open science (OS) movement has the potential to fundamentally shape how researchers conduct research and distribute findings. However, the implications for research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) experiences present unique considerations. In this paper, included in the special issue on Reimagining LGBTIQ+ Research, we explore how the OS movement broadens access to and comprehension of LGBTIQ+ experiences while simultaneously imposing limitations on the representation of these identities and raising concerns about risks to LGBTIQ+ researchers and participants. Our research focuses on three facets of the OS movement. First, we examine practices related to open data, which advocates that data should be accessible to other researchers to analyze. Yet, providing access to such data challenges may compromise trust between the research team and study participants. Second, we examine practices related to open replicable research, particularly as it has the potential to both highlight and erase the experiences of groups within the LGBTIQ+ community. Finally, we consider how open access, making scholarly articles free to the public, may help educate a broader audience on the lived experiences of LGBTIQ+ people, but in regions where these identities remain heavily stigmatized and/or criminalized, access may be blocked or individuals could be penalized for retrieving this information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放科学为 LGBTIQ+ 研究带来的机遇和限制
开放科学(OS)运动有可能从根本上改变研究人员开展研究和发布研究成果的方式。然而,对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、双性人和同性恋者/疑问者(LGBTIQ+)经历的研究的影响却提出了独特的考量。本文收录在 "重新认识 LGBTIQ+ 研究 "特刊中,我们将探讨操作系统运动如何在扩大对 LGBTIQ+ 经历的接触和理解的同时,对这些身份的表现形式施加限制,并引发对 LGBTIQ+ 研究人员和参与者所面临风险的担忧。我们的研究侧重于操作系统运动的三个方面。首先,我们研究了与开放数据相关的实践,开放数据主张数据应开放给其他研究人员进行分析。然而,提供访问此类数据的挑战可能会损害研究团队与研究参与者之间的信任。其次,我们研究了与开放式可复制研究相关的实践,特别是因为它既有可能突出也有可能抹杀 LGBTIQ+ 群体的经历。最后,我们考虑了开放式获取,使学术文章免费向公众开放,这可能有助于教育更广泛的受众了解 LGBTIQ+ 人的生活经历,但在这些身份仍然被严重污名化和/或犯罪化的地区,获取信息可能会被阻止,或者个人可能会因为检索这些信息而受到惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science Conducting research within the acronym: Problematizing LGBTIQ+ research in psychology Inclusion and protection in tension: Reflections on gathering sexual orientation and gender identity data in the workplace Correction to Focusing the critical race psychology lens: CRT and the psychological study of social issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1