Executive deficits after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A cross-sectional population study

IF 3.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100857
{"title":"Executive deficits after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A cross-sectional population study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><p>Despite the major implications of executive deficits in day-to-day functioning, few studies have investigated this in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection using standardized measures that differentiate between aspects of executive function.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Examine whether SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with deficits in executive functions and if so, investigate the duration of this association.</p></div><div><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p>The present research has a cross-sectional design and uses data from the Norwegian Covid-19 Cohort study. The current cohort (<em>n</em> = 8102) completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function- Adult Version (BRIEF-A) electronically between April 2021 and September 2021. During the assessment, 4183 of the included participants had a prior positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 and 3919 were untested or had a confirmed negative PCR test.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcomes and measures</h3><p>Executive functions were measured using the BRIEF-A, a self-report questionnaire comprising 75 items within nine theoretically and empirically distinct clinical scales. All participants self-reported on demographical variables and comorbidity. Information on sex and age was derived from the personal identification number, and vaccination status was obtained from the Norwegian Immunization Registry (SYSVAK).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 status reported executive deficits in everyday life above the clinical threshold (T-score ≥65) more often than non-infected controls (383 vs. 225). Specifically, the SARS-CoV-2 positive status group indicated significantly more deficits related to metacognition, with the greatest difference demonstrated for working memory. This difference remained when adjusting for various demographic factors and comorbidities, with significantly greater odds of reporting above the clinical threshold following SARS-CoV-2 infection, as observed on the global executive composite score 6–12 months after infection (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.51 to 2.55).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study confirms more perceived executive deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-infected controls, with metacognitive aspects being the most affected. These findings shed light on the potential functional difficulties that individuals may encounter during the post-acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may guide further development of targeted interventions addressing metacognitive domains of executive functioning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624001352/pdfft?md5=c79bf5ea7476c0f6b7a5e22bfc46fc30&pid=1-s2.0-S2666354624001352-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624001352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance

Despite the major implications of executive deficits in day-to-day functioning, few studies have investigated this in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection using standardized measures that differentiate between aspects of executive function.

Objective

Examine whether SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with deficits in executive functions and if so, investigate the duration of this association.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The present research has a cross-sectional design and uses data from the Norwegian Covid-19 Cohort study. The current cohort (n = 8102) completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function- Adult Version (BRIEF-A) electronically between April 2021 and September 2021. During the assessment, 4183 of the included participants had a prior positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 and 3919 were untested or had a confirmed negative PCR test.

Exposure

Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main outcomes and measures

Executive functions were measured using the BRIEF-A, a self-report questionnaire comprising 75 items within nine theoretically and empirically distinct clinical scales. All participants self-reported on demographical variables and comorbidity. Information on sex and age was derived from the personal identification number, and vaccination status was obtained from the Norwegian Immunization Registry (SYSVAK).

Results

Participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 status reported executive deficits in everyday life above the clinical threshold (T-score ≥65) more often than non-infected controls (383 vs. 225). Specifically, the SARS-CoV-2 positive status group indicated significantly more deficits related to metacognition, with the greatest difference demonstrated for working memory. This difference remained when adjusting for various demographic factors and comorbidities, with significantly greater odds of reporting above the clinical threshold following SARS-CoV-2 infection, as observed on the global executive composite score 6–12 months after infection (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.51 to 2.55).

Conclusions

Our study confirms more perceived executive deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-infected controls, with metacognitive aspects being the most affected. These findings shed light on the potential functional difficulties that individuals may encounter during the post-acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may guide further development of targeted interventions addressing metacognitive domains of executive functioning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的执行障碍:一项横断面人群研究
重要性尽管执行功能缺陷对日常功能有重大影响,但很少有研究使用区分执行功能各个方面的标准化测量方法来调查 SARS-CoV-2 感染后急性后遗症的执行功能缺陷。目前的队列(n = 8102)在2021年4月至2021年9月期间通过电子方式完成了《执行功能行为评定量表-成人版》(BRIEF-A)。在评估过程中,4183 名参与者的 SARS-CoV-2 聚合酶链反应检测(PCR)结果呈阳性,3919 名参与者未接受检测或 PCR 检测结果呈阴性。主要结果和测量方法执行功能采用 BRIEF-A 进行测量,这是一份自我报告问卷,包含九个理论和经验上不同的临床量表中的 75 个项目。所有参与者都对人口统计学变量和合并症进行了自我报告。结果SARS-CoV-2阳性反应者报告的日常生活执行障碍超过临床阈值(T-score ≥65)的频率高于非感染对照组(383对225)。具体而言,SARS-CoV-2 阳性状态组在元认知方面的缺陷明显更多,其中工作记忆方面的差异最大。在对各种人口统计学因素和合并症进行调整后,这种差异依然存在,感染 SARS-CoV-2 后,在感染后 6-12 个月的全球执行力综合评分中,报告超过临床阈值的几率明显更高(OR 1.97;95% CI 1.51 至 2.55)。结论:我们的研究证实,与未感染对照组相比,感染 SARS-CoV-2 后,感知到的执行力缺陷更多,其中元认知方面受到的影响最大。这些发现揭示了个人在感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的急性期可能遇到的功能性困难,并可指导针对执行功能的元认知领域进一步开发有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
97 days
期刊最新文献
BDNF methylation associated with stress in women: Novel insights in epigenetics and inflammation Repurposing doxycycline for Alzheimer's treatment: Challenges from a nano-based drug delivery perspective Associations between uric acid and depressive symptoms, and the mediating role of immunoinflammatory: Findings from rural older adults Clinical features and predictive nomogram for fatigue sequelae in non-severe patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Shanghai, China Interleukin-18 interacts with NKCC1 to mediate brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1