Clinicopathological risk factors of oral second primary tumours

{"title":"Clinicopathological risk factors of oral second primary tumours","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Oral second primary tumours (SPTs) have a poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis. This study evaluates the demographic and clinicopathological risk predictors of SPTs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, or severe dysplasia were accrued into the Oral Cancer Prediction Longitudinal study within one year post-curative treatment. Data on demographics, risk habits, and primary tumour characteristics were collected. Clinical follow-up included assessing the presence of second oral premalignant lesions (SOPLs), clinicopathological features, and the results from toluidine blue staining and fluorescence visualization.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 296 patients, 23 (8 %) developed SPTs. Older age at primary cancer diagnosis (P = 0.008) and a history of chewing tobacco or betel nut (P = 0.043) increased the risk of SPTs. Patients with primary tumours located at low-risk sites had an increased risk of SPTs (P = 0.004), which often presented at high-risk sites. The presence of SOPLs (P &lt; 0.001), and multiple lesions (P = 0.017) significantly increased the risk of SPTs. Positive toluidine blue staining indicated a trend toward higher risk of SPTs, whereas fluorescence visualization did not. The median time to SPT diagnosis was 3.25 years post-treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Identifying second or multiple oral premalignant lesions is critical for predicting the risk of SPTs regardless of their clinical or histological characteristics. Routine biopsy of these lesions should be prioritized to ensure timely diagnosis. Incorporating these risk predictors into clinical follow-up can enhance early cancer detection and improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024004849/pdfft?md5=828d81ed8c1e6adabae59d42c3182190&pid=1-s2.0-S2772906024004849-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024004849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Oral second primary tumours (SPTs) have a poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis. This study evaluates the demographic and clinicopathological risk predictors of SPTs.

Methods

Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, or severe dysplasia were accrued into the Oral Cancer Prediction Longitudinal study within one year post-curative treatment. Data on demographics, risk habits, and primary tumour characteristics were collected. Clinical follow-up included assessing the presence of second oral premalignant lesions (SOPLs), clinicopathological features, and the results from toluidine blue staining and fluorescence visualization.

Results

Among 296 patients, 23 (8 %) developed SPTs. Older age at primary cancer diagnosis (P = 0.008) and a history of chewing tobacco or betel nut (P = 0.043) increased the risk of SPTs. Patients with primary tumours located at low-risk sites had an increased risk of SPTs (P = 0.004), which often presented at high-risk sites. The presence of SOPLs (P < 0.001), and multiple lesions (P = 0.017) significantly increased the risk of SPTs. Positive toluidine blue staining indicated a trend toward higher risk of SPTs, whereas fluorescence visualization did not. The median time to SPT diagnosis was 3.25 years post-treatment.

Conclusions

Identifying second or multiple oral premalignant lesions is critical for predicting the risk of SPTs regardless of their clinical or histological characteristics. Routine biopsy of these lesions should be prioritized to ensure timely diagnosis. Incorporating these risk predictors into clinical follow-up can enhance early cancer detection and improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔第二原发肿瘤的临床病理学风险因素
背景口腔第二原发肿瘤(SPT)由于诊断较晚,预后较差。本研究评估了SPTs的人口统计学和临床病理学风险预测因素。方法将口腔鳞状细胞癌、原位癌或严重发育不良患者纳入口腔癌预测纵向研究,研究时间为治愈治疗后一年内。研究人员收集了有关人口统计学、风险习惯和原发性肿瘤特征的数据。临床随访包括评估是否存在第二个口腔恶性前病变(SOPLs)、临床病理特征以及甲苯胺蓝染色和荧光显像结果。原发性癌症确诊时年龄较大(P = 0.008)、有咀嚼烟草或槟榔史(P = 0.043)会增加罹患 SPT 的风险。原发肿瘤位于低危部位的患者患 SPT 的风险增加(P = 0.004),而 SPT 常出现在高危部位。SOPLs(P <0.001)和多发病灶(P = 0.017)的出现会显著增加SPT的风险。甲苯胺蓝染色阳性表明发生 SPT 的风险呈上升趋势,而荧光显像则没有这种趋势。结论无论口腔癌前病变的临床或组织学特征如何,确定第二个或多个口腔癌前病变对于预测 SPT 风险至关重要。应优先对这些病变进行常规活检,以确保及时诊断。将这些风险预测因素纳入临床随访可提高早期癌症检测率,改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sebaceous adenoma of the parotid gland encasing the facial nerve: Case report and review of the literature Sex & marital differences in delayed pharyngeal cancer treatment before and after medicaid expansion Combining radiotherapy and systemic therapies in oropharyngeal cancer: A comprehensive review of recent developments Radiant advances: The future of brachytherapy in oral oncology Current advances in immunotherapy for cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1