Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111735
{"title":"Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the inter-platform reproducibility and longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted (T1W) sequences on MR-Linac systems using an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>This study used two MR-Linac systems (A and B) in different cancer centers. The ACR phantom was scanned on system A daily for 30 consecutive days to evaluate longitudinal repeatability. Additionally, retest data were collected after repositioning the phantom. Inter-platform reproducibility was assessed by conducting scans under identical conditions using system B. Regions of interest were delineated on the T1W sequence from system A and mapped to other sequences via rigid registration. Intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were conducted. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Robust radiomics features were identified based on ICC&gt;0.9 and CV&lt;10 %.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis showed that a higher proportion of radiomics features derived from longitudinal FLAIR sequence (51.65 %) met robustness criteria compared to T2W (48.35 %) and T1W (43.96 %). Additionally, more inter-platform features from the FLAIR sequence (62.64 %) were robust compared to T2W (42.86 %) and T1W (39.56 %). Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability were excellent across all sequences, with a median ICC of 0.99 and CV&lt;5%. However, inter-observer reproducibility was inferior, especially for the T1W sequence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Different sequences show variations in repeatability and reproducibility. The FLAIR sequence demonstrated advantages in both longitudinal repeatability and inter-platform reproducibility. Caution is warranted when interpreting data, particularly in longitudinal or multiplatform radiomics studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the inter-platform reproducibility and longitudinal acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted (T1W) sequences on MR-Linac systems using an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom.

Materials and Methods

This study used two MR-Linac systems (A and B) in different cancer centers. The ACR phantom was scanned on system A daily for 30 consecutive days to evaluate longitudinal repeatability. Additionally, retest data were collected after repositioning the phantom. Inter-platform reproducibility was assessed by conducting scans under identical conditions using system B. Regions of interest were delineated on the T1W sequence from system A and mapped to other sequences via rigid registration. Intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were conducted. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Robust radiomics features were identified based on ICC>0.9 and CV<10 %.

Results

Analysis showed that a higher proportion of radiomics features derived from longitudinal FLAIR sequence (51.65 %) met robustness criteria compared to T2W (48.35 %) and T1W (43.96 %). Additionally, more inter-platform features from the FLAIR sequence (62.64 %) were robust compared to T2W (42.86 %) and T1W (39.56 %). Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability were excellent across all sequences, with a median ICC of 0.99 and CV<5%. However, inter-observer reproducibility was inferior, especially for the T1W sequence.

Conclusions

Different sequences show variations in repeatability and reproducibility. The FLAIR sequence demonstrated advantages in both longitudinal repeatability and inter-platform reproducibility. Caution is warranted when interpreting data, particularly in longitudinal or multiplatform radiomics studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化磁共振成像导引加速器成像中放射组学特征的可重复性和纵向可重复性:模型研究
本研究旨在使用美国放射学会(ACR)模型,定量评估 MR-Linac 系统上流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)、T2 加权(T2W)和 T1 加权(T1W)序列中 MRI 放射组学特征的平台间可重复性和纵向采集可重复性。连续 30 天每天在 A 系统上扫描 ACR 模型,以评估纵向可重复性。此外,在重新定位模型后还收集了重测数据。通过使用系统 B 在相同条件下进行扫描,评估平台间的可重复性。在系统 A 的 T1W 序列上划定感兴趣区,并通过刚性配准映射到其他序列。进行观察者内部和观察者之间的比较。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)评估重复性和再现性。结果分析表明,与 T2W(48.35%)和 T1W(43.96%)相比,纵向 FLAIR 序列得出的放射组学特征中符合稳健性标准的比例更高(51.65%)。此外,与 T2W(42.86%)和 T1W(39.56%)相比,来自 FLAIR 序列的更多平台间特征(62.64%)具有稳健性。所有序列的测试重复性和观察者内部重复性都很好,中位 ICC 为 0.99,CV<5%。结论不同序列的重复性和再现性存在差异。FLAIR序列在纵向可重复性和平台间可重复性方面均表现出优势。在解释数据时,尤其是在纵向或多平台放射组学研究中,必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: A narrative review of prediction but not association studies Editorial Board Advancements in supervised deep learning for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: A systematic review Intra-individual comparison of epicardial adipose tissue characteristics on coronary CT angiography between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1