Efficacy of decentralized traffic signal controllers on stabilizing heterogeneous urban grid network

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Communications in Transportation Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100137
{"title":"Efficacy of decentralized traffic signal controllers on stabilizing heterogeneous urban grid network","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams (MFDs) are valuable for designing and evaluating network-wide traffic management schemes. Since obtaining empirical MFDs can be expensive, analytical methodologies are crucial to estimate variations in MFD shapes under different control strategies and predict their efficacy in mitigating congestion. Analyses of urban grid networks' abstractions can provide an inexpensive methodology to obtain a qualitative understanding of impacts of control policies. However, existing abstractions are valid only for simple intersection layouts with unidirectional and single-lane links and two conflicting movement groups. Naturally, the real intersections are more complex, with multiple incoming and outgoing lanes, heterogeneous incoming links' capacities and several conflicting movement groups. To this end, we consider a grid network with differences in capacities of horizontal and vertical directions, allowing us to investigate the characteristics of control policies that can avoid pernicious gridlock in heterogeneous networks. We develop a new, more comprehensive network abstraction of such grid networks to analyze and compare the impacts of two families of decentralized Traffic Signal Controllers (TSCs) on the network's stability. The obtained theoretical insights are verified using microsimulation results of grid networks with multiple signalized intersections. The analyses suggest that considering both upstream and downstream congestion information in deciding signal plans can encourage more evenly distributed traffic in the network, making them more robust and effective at all congestion levels. The study provides a framework to understand general expectations from decentralized control policies when network inhomogeneity arises due to variations in incoming link capacities and turning directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424724000209/pdfft?md5=6cc32fde3214132b4de6a5ce630ad5b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772424724000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424724000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams (MFDs) are valuable for designing and evaluating network-wide traffic management schemes. Since obtaining empirical MFDs can be expensive, analytical methodologies are crucial to estimate variations in MFD shapes under different control strategies and predict their efficacy in mitigating congestion. Analyses of urban grid networks' abstractions can provide an inexpensive methodology to obtain a qualitative understanding of impacts of control policies. However, existing abstractions are valid only for simple intersection layouts with unidirectional and single-lane links and two conflicting movement groups. Naturally, the real intersections are more complex, with multiple incoming and outgoing lanes, heterogeneous incoming links' capacities and several conflicting movement groups. To this end, we consider a grid network with differences in capacities of horizontal and vertical directions, allowing us to investigate the characteristics of control policies that can avoid pernicious gridlock in heterogeneous networks. We develop a new, more comprehensive network abstraction of such grid networks to analyze and compare the impacts of two families of decentralized Traffic Signal Controllers (TSCs) on the network's stability. The obtained theoretical insights are verified using microsimulation results of grid networks with multiple signalized intersections. The analyses suggest that considering both upstream and downstream congestion information in deciding signal plans can encourage more evenly distributed traffic in the network, making them more robust and effective at all congestion levels. The study provides a framework to understand general expectations from decentralized control policies when network inhomogeneity arises due to variations in incoming link capacities and turning directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分散式交通信号控制器在稳定异构城市网格网络方面的功效
宏观基本图(MFD)对于设计和评估全网交通管理方案非常重要。由于获取经验性 MFD 的成本可能很高,因此分析方法对于估算不同控制策略下 MFD 形状的变化以及预测其在缓解拥堵方面的功效至关重要。对城市网格网络的抽象分析可以提供一种廉价的方法来定性了解控制策略的影响。然而,现有的抽象方法仅适用于单向、单车道和两个冲突运动组的简单交叉口布局。自然,真实的交叉口更为复杂,有多条进出车道、不同的进出连接能力和多个相互冲突的运动组。为此,我们考虑了横向和纵向通行能力不同的网格网络,从而研究了在异构网络中避免恶性堵塞的控制策略的特点。我们为这种网格网络开发了一种新的、更全面的网络抽象,以分析和比较两个分散式交通信号控制器(TSC)系列对网络稳定性的影响。我们利用具有多个信号灯交叉口的网格网络的微观模拟结果验证了所获得的理论见解。分析表明,在决定信号计划时同时考虑上游和下游的拥堵信息,可以促使网络中的交通分布更加均匀,使其在所有拥堵水平下都更加稳健有效。这项研究提供了一个框架,让我们了解当入网链路容量和转弯方向的变化导致网络不均匀时,分散控制政策的一般预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the application of blockchain technology in crowdsource autonomous driving map updating Efficacy of decentralized traffic signal controllers on stabilizing heterogeneous urban grid network Fleet data based traffic modeling Experimental assessment of communication delay's impact on connected automated vehicle speed volatility and energy consumption Decentralizing e-bus charging infrastructure deployment leads to economic and environmental benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1