The impact of social identity complexity on intergroup parochial and universal cooperation under different payoff structures and frames

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104681
Feifei Lu , Jin Yang , Xiaoqiang Yao , Yibo Song , Duo Chen , Ting Zhang , Fenghua Zhang
{"title":"The impact of social identity complexity on intergroup parochial and universal cooperation under different payoff structures and frames","authors":"Feifei Lu ,&nbsp;Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Yao ,&nbsp;Yibo Song ,&nbsp;Duo Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Fenghua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As society evolves, individuals increasingly cooperate with both in-group members and out-group strangers, despite risks such as betrayal. Social identity plays a crucial role in motivating this cooperation, significantly shaping cooperative behavior. This study explores how social identity complexity—arising from the overlapping of multiple social identities—affects intergroup cooperation. Using the Intergroup Parochial and Universal Cooperation (IPUC) game, we examined universal cooperation, weak parochial cooperation, and strong parochial cooperation under different payoff structures—the equal outcomes game (EOG) and the collective incentives game (CIG)—and framing conditions (individual and group frames). The findings reveal that social identity complexity is positively related to universal cooperation and negatively related to strong parochial cooperation. Individuals with high social identity complexity demonstrated higher levels of universal cooperation and lower levels of strong parochial cooperation, particularly within the CIG compared to the EOG. Additionally, individuals with high social complexity showed greater universal cooperation and less strong parochial cooperation in the individual frame compared to the group frame, while those with low social identity complexity exhibited more weak parochial cooperation in the individual frame. These findings suggest that higher social identity complexity fosters intergroup cooperation, with different payoff structures and framing conditions significantly influencing cooperative behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 104681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124000945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As society evolves, individuals increasingly cooperate with both in-group members and out-group strangers, despite risks such as betrayal. Social identity plays a crucial role in motivating this cooperation, significantly shaping cooperative behavior. This study explores how social identity complexity—arising from the overlapping of multiple social identities—affects intergroup cooperation. Using the Intergroup Parochial and Universal Cooperation (IPUC) game, we examined universal cooperation, weak parochial cooperation, and strong parochial cooperation under different payoff structures—the equal outcomes game (EOG) and the collective incentives game (CIG)—and framing conditions (individual and group frames). The findings reveal that social identity complexity is positively related to universal cooperation and negatively related to strong parochial cooperation. Individuals with high social identity complexity demonstrated higher levels of universal cooperation and lower levels of strong parochial cooperation, particularly within the CIG compared to the EOG. Additionally, individuals with high social complexity showed greater universal cooperation and less strong parochial cooperation in the individual frame compared to the group frame, while those with low social identity complexity exhibited more weak parochial cooperation in the individual frame. These findings suggest that higher social identity complexity fosters intergroup cooperation, with different payoff structures and framing conditions significantly influencing cooperative behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同报酬结构和框架下社会身份复杂性对群体间狭隘合作和普遍合作的影响
随着社会的发展,尽管存在背叛等风险,但个人越来越多地与群体内成员和群体外陌生人合作。社会身份在激励这种合作方面起着至关重要的作用,并在很大程度上影响着合作行为。本研究探讨了多重社会身份重叠所产生的社会身份复杂性如何影响群体间合作。利用群体间狭隘和普遍合作(IPUC)博弈,我们考察了不同报酬结构--平等结果博弈(EOG)和集体激励博弈(CIG)--和框架条件(个人框架和群体框架)下的普遍合作、弱狭隘合作和强狭隘合作。研究结果表明,社会身份复杂性与普遍合作正相关,而与强偏狭合作负相关。社会身份复杂度高的个体表现出更高水平的普遍合作和更低水平的强偏狭合作,尤其是在 CIG 中与 EOG 相比。此外,与群体框架相比,社会身份复杂度高的个体在个人框架中表现出更高的普遍合作性和更低的强偏狭合作性,而社会身份复杂度低的个体在个人框架中表现出更多的弱偏狭合作性。这些研究结果表明,较高的社会身份复杂性会促进群体间合作,不同的报酬结构和框架条件会对合作行为产生显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
期刊最新文献
Black racial phenotypicality: Implications for the #BlackLivesMatter Movement Certainty improves the predictive validity of Honesty-Humility and Dark Triad traits on cheating behavior Narcissistic vigilance to status cues Avoidance of altruistic punishment: Testing with a situation-selective third-party punishment game A colorblind ideal and the motivation to improve intergroup relations: The role of an (in)congruent status quo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1