Ximei Zhu , Serik Tabarak , Jianyu Que , Wei Yan , Xiao Lin , Xiaoxing Liu , Wenhao Chen , Jie Shi , Jiahui Deng , Lin Lu
{"title":"Efficiency and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation for primary insomnia: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Ximei Zhu , Serik Tabarak , Jianyu Que , Wei Yan , Xiao Lin , Xiaoxing Liu , Wenhao Chen , Jie Shi , Jiahui Deng , Lin Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Primary insomnia is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments for this disorder have limited effectiveness and adherence. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of primary insomnia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This two-armed, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted at Peking University Sixth Hospital and local community clinics. A total of 46 patients with primary insomnia were recruited and randomly allocated to either the cTBS group or sham group. Forty-one patients completed 10 sessions of cTBS or sham intervention and follow-up assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the intervention, the severity of insomnia was significantly lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = −1.938). Additionally, 52.4 % of patients in the cTBS group achieved a response (Insomnia Severity Index score reduction ≥8), whereas only 4 % of patients in the sham group achieved a response. The duration of objective total sleep time and slow-wave sleep were higher in the cTBS group than in the sham group. The degree of anxiety was lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group. There were no significant differences in depression, sleepiness, or cognitive function between the cTBS and sham groups. During follow-up, the sleep quality of the cTBS group significantly improved and remained stable at the 6-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this randomized clinical trial, cTBS improved insomnia symptoms and was generally well tolerated, thus supporting the further development of cTBS for the treatment of primary insomnia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724004283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Primary insomnia is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments for this disorder have limited effectiveness and adherence. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of primary insomnia.
Methods
This two-armed, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted at Peking University Sixth Hospital and local community clinics. A total of 46 patients with primary insomnia were recruited and randomly allocated to either the cTBS group or sham group. Forty-one patients completed 10 sessions of cTBS or sham intervention and follow-up assessments.
Results
After the intervention, the severity of insomnia was significantly lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = −1.938). Additionally, 52.4 % of patients in the cTBS group achieved a response (Insomnia Severity Index score reduction ≥8), whereas only 4 % of patients in the sham group achieved a response. The duration of objective total sleep time and slow-wave sleep were higher in the cTBS group than in the sham group. The degree of anxiety was lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group. There were no significant differences in depression, sleepiness, or cognitive function between the cTBS and sham groups. During follow-up, the sleep quality of the cTBS group significantly improved and remained stable at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion
In this randomized clinical trial, cTBS improved insomnia symptoms and was generally well tolerated, thus supporting the further development of cTBS for the treatment of primary insomnia.
期刊介绍:
Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without.
A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry.
The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.