Seropositivity to tick-borne pathogens in nature management workers in the Netherlands

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102397
B.J.A. Hoeve-Bakker , G. Çelik , O.E. van den Berg , C.C. van den Wijngaard , A. Hofhuis , J.H.J. Reimerink , S.F.T. Thijsen , K. Kerkhof
{"title":"Seropositivity to tick-borne pathogens in nature management workers in the Netherlands","authors":"B.J.A. Hoeve-Bakker ,&nbsp;G. Çelik ,&nbsp;O.E. van den Berg ,&nbsp;C.C. van den Wijngaard ,&nbsp;A. Hofhuis ,&nbsp;J.H.J. Reimerink ,&nbsp;S.F.T. Thijsen ,&nbsp;K. Kerkhof","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The incidence of tick-borne infections other than Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis is rising in Europe, including the Netherlands. Nature management workers, being highly exposed to ticks, serve as valuable sentinels for seroprevalence studies on tick-borne pathogens (TBPs). This study assessed nature management workers’ seropositivity to TBPs including <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia divergens, B. microti, Borrelia burgdorferi</em> s.l., <em>Rickettsia conorii</em> and <em>R. typhi</em> in the Netherlands. In addition, the study examined coexposure to multiple TBPs and identified risk factors for <em>B. burgdorferi</em> s.l.- and <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>-seropositivity.</p><p>The study included 525 nature management workers who donated serum and completed a questionnaire. Sera were analysed for exposure to <em>A. phagocytophilum, B. divergens, B. microti, R. conorii</em> and <em>R. typhi</em> using immunofluorescence assays. For <em>B. burgdorferi</em> s.l. antibody detection, the recommended two-tier testing strategy was used. Risk factor analysis was performed using logistic regression modelling.</p><p>Seropositivity was 30.9 % for <em>B. burgdorferi</em> s.l.; 16.4 % for <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>; 6.5 % for <em>R. conorii</em>; 2.3 % for <em>R. typhi</em>; 4.2 % for <em>B. divergens</em>; and 0.4 % for <em>B. microti</em>. Almost half (49.3 %) of the participants demonstrated seropositivity for one or more pathogens. Risk factors for <em>B. burgdorferi</em> s.l.-seropositivity included being male, increasing age and tick bite frequency. For <em>A. phagocytophilum</em>-seropositivity, increasing age and working in North Holland province were significant risk factors.</p><p>This study illustrates the exposure to TBPs in the Netherlands, emphasizing the need for ongoing vigilance and international collaborations to better understand and address the growing threat of TBPs in regions with demonstrated environmental TBP circulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"16 1","pages":"Article 102397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000906/pdfft?md5=4c05bad0dfb6c78fb1c4ab49f3d7a12e&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000906-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of tick-borne infections other than Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis is rising in Europe, including the Netherlands. Nature management workers, being highly exposed to ticks, serve as valuable sentinels for seroprevalence studies on tick-borne pathogens (TBPs). This study assessed nature management workers’ seropositivity to TBPs including Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia divergens, B. microti, Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia conorii and R. typhi in the Netherlands. In addition, the study examined coexposure to multiple TBPs and identified risk factors for B. burgdorferi s.l.- and A. phagocytophilum-seropositivity.

The study included 525 nature management workers who donated serum and completed a questionnaire. Sera were analysed for exposure to A. phagocytophilum, B. divergens, B. microti, R. conorii and R. typhi using immunofluorescence assays. For B. burgdorferi s.l. antibody detection, the recommended two-tier testing strategy was used. Risk factor analysis was performed using logistic regression modelling.

Seropositivity was 30.9 % for B. burgdorferi s.l.; 16.4 % for A. phagocytophilum; 6.5 % for R. conorii; 2.3 % for R. typhi; 4.2 % for B. divergens; and 0.4 % for B. microti. Almost half (49.3 %) of the participants demonstrated seropositivity for one or more pathogens. Risk factors for B. burgdorferi s.l.-seropositivity included being male, increasing age and tick bite frequency. For A. phagocytophilum-seropositivity, increasing age and working in North Holland province were significant risk factors.

This study illustrates the exposure to TBPs in the Netherlands, emphasizing the need for ongoing vigilance and international collaborations to better understand and address the growing threat of TBPs in regions with demonstrated environmental TBP circulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰自然管理工作人员的蜱媒病原体血清阳性反应
在包括荷兰在内的欧洲,除莱姆包虫病和蜱传脑炎外,蜱传感染的发病率也在上升。自然管理工作者高度暴露于蜱虫,是蜱虫病原体(TBPs)血清流行研究的重要哨兵。这项研究评估了荷兰自然管理工作者对蜱传病原体的血清阳性反应,包括噬细胞无形体、分歧巴贝西亚原虫、微小蜱、布氏杆菌、立克次体和伤寒杆菌。此外,该研究还检查了多种结核病原的共同暴露情况,并确定了布氏包虫病和噬细胞甲型肝炎血清阳性的风险因素。使用免疫荧光检测法分析了血清中噬血吸虫、分歧杆菌、微小杆菌、鼠疫杆菌和鼠伤寒杆菌的暴露情况。对于 B. burgdorferi s.l.抗体检测,采用了推荐的两级检测策略。血清阳性率分别为:布氏杆菌 30.9%;噬血杆菌 16.4%;康氏杆菌 6.5%;伤寒杆菌 2.3%;分歧杆菌 4.2%;微小杆菌 0.4%。近一半的参与者(49.3%)对一种或多种病原体呈血清阳性反应。勃氏杆菌血清阳性的风险因素包括男性、年龄增长和蜱叮咬频率。这项研究说明了荷兰人暴露于 TBPs 的情况,强调有必要不断保持警惕并开展国际合作,以更好地了解和应对 TBPs 在已证实存在环境 TBP 循环的地区日益增长的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
期刊最新文献
Genome sequence of Ehrlichia muris from Ixodes ricinus collected in Italy on a migratory bird provides epidemiological and evolutionary insights Clinical manifestations and outcomes of Tick-borne encephalitis: A systematic literature review Natural Panola Mountain Ehrlichia infections in cattle in a longitudinal study of Angus beef calves Microbial genetic variation impacts host eco-immunological strategies and microparasite fitness in Lyme borreliae-reptile system Detection of Anaplasma bovis-like agent in the Southcentral United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1