Environmental Health Assessment by Local Environmental Justice Experts for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in an Agricultural Community of Northern California

A. A. Aranda, J. S. Kelty, S. Manukian, E. Pardo, K. Jabbari, R. J. Schmidt, H. A. Dabritz, J. K. London, L. S. Van Winkle, N. Deeb-Sossa, Knights Landing Promotoras
{"title":"Environmental Health Assessment by Local Environmental Justice Experts for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in an Agricultural Community of Northern California","authors":"A. A. Aranda,&nbsp;J. S. Kelty,&nbsp;S. Manukian,&nbsp;E. Pardo,&nbsp;K. Jabbari,&nbsp;R. J. Schmidt,&nbsp;H. A. Dabritz,&nbsp;J. K. London,&nbsp;L. S. Van Winkle,&nbsp;N. Deeb-Sossa,&nbsp;Knights Landing Promotoras","doi":"10.1029/2024CSJ000088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental justice research driven by academics and policymakers often overlooks the valuable insights and leadership of the communities most impacted by environmental hazards. When institution-led research approaches are employed, inadequate community ownership and limited institutional accountability hinder the effectiveness of environmental public health interventions. In contrast, a community-owned and -managed approach to environmental justice research can guide community members in developing evidence-based interventions. This paper outlines a community-led environmental health assessment survey (sample = 100) and resulting community actions over 6 years (2017–2023) in a Northern California farmworker community with a perceived high prevalence of cancer and exposure to environmental hazards in households, neighborhoods, and job sites. Local resident experts in Knights Landing, CA, documented community risk factors and exposures in collaboration with interdisciplinary undergraduate and graduate student-researchers. The survey instrument focused on environmental hazards identified by local resident experts including vehicular and agricultural pollution, occupational pesticide contact, and sun exposure. Survey findings highlighted the need for targeted interventions to reduce environmental health risks, such as academic outreach programs, county investments in public services, and community-led mutual aid initiatives. Despite academic reservations about our non-random sampling method and data collection by local resident experts, our project sparked substantial actions and investments with minimal personnel and financial resources. Local leaders working with student-researchers developed more effective environmental public health interventions through a community-owned and -managed approach that went beyond the efforts of local regulatory and research institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024CSJ000088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024CSJ000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental justice research driven by academics and policymakers often overlooks the valuable insights and leadership of the communities most impacted by environmental hazards. When institution-led research approaches are employed, inadequate community ownership and limited institutional accountability hinder the effectiveness of environmental public health interventions. In contrast, a community-owned and -managed approach to environmental justice research can guide community members in developing evidence-based interventions. This paper outlines a community-led environmental health assessment survey (sample = 100) and resulting community actions over 6 years (2017–2023) in a Northern California farmworker community with a perceived high prevalence of cancer and exposure to environmental hazards in households, neighborhoods, and job sites. Local resident experts in Knights Landing, CA, documented community risk factors and exposures in collaboration with interdisciplinary undergraduate and graduate student-researchers. The survey instrument focused on environmental hazards identified by local resident experts including vehicular and agricultural pollution, occupational pesticide contact, and sun exposure. Survey findings highlighted the need for targeted interventions to reduce environmental health risks, such as academic outreach programs, county investments in public services, and community-led mutual aid initiatives. Despite academic reservations about our non-random sampling method and data collection by local resident experts, our project sparked substantial actions and investments with minimal personnel and financial resources. Local leaders working with student-researchers developed more effective environmental public health interventions through a community-owned and -managed approach that went beyond the efforts of local regulatory and research institutions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由当地环境正义专家对北加州一个农业社区进行环境健康评估,以制定循证决策
由学者和政策制定者推动的环境正义研究往往忽视了受环境危害影响最大的社区的宝贵见解和领导力。当采用机构主导的研究方法时,社区所有权不足和机构责任有限会阻碍环境公共卫生干预措施的有效性。相比之下,由社区主导和管理的环境正义研究方法可以指导社区成员制定循证干预措施。本文概述了一项由社区主导的环境健康评估调查(样本 = 100),以及在北加州农民工社区开展的为期 6 年(2017-2023 年)的社区行动。加利福尼亚州骑士兰丁的当地居民专家与跨学科的本科生和研究生研究人员合作,记录了社区风险因素和暴露情况。调查工具的重点是当地居民专家确定的环境危害,包括车辆和农业污染、职业杀虫剂接触和阳光照射。调查结果显示,有必要采取有针对性的干预措施来降低环境健康风险,如学术推广计划、县级公共服务投资以及社区主导的互助行动。尽管学术界对我们的非随机抽样方法和由当地居民专家进行的数据收集持保留意见,但我们的项目还是以最少的人力和财力资源引发了实质性的行动和投资。当地领导与学生研究人员合作,通过社区自主管理的方法,开发出了更有效的环境公共卫生干预措施,超越了当地监管和研究机构的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information “They Say the Water Is Perfectly Safe but…”: A Mixed-Methods Participatory Study of Factors Influencing Trust in Tap Water Safety in a Great Lakes City Validation of Traditional Pastoralist Practices Based on Ecological Observations of a Camel Herding Community and Coastal Mangrove Forests of Kutch, Gujarat, India A First Step in the Co-Production of a Climate Resilience Research Agenda for the Philadelphia Region A Co-Produced Workflow for Addressing Inequities in Cooling Center Access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1