Benjamin Schnapp MD, MEd, Morgan Sehdev MD, Caitlin Schrepel MD, Sharon Bord MD, Alexis Pelletier-Bui MD, Alai Alvarez MD, Nicole M. Dubosh MD, Yoon Soo Park PhD, Eric Shappell MD, MHPE
{"title":"Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation","authors":"Benjamin Schnapp MD, MEd, Morgan Sehdev MD, Caitlin Schrepel MD, Sharon Bord MD, Alexis Pelletier-Bui MD, Alai Alvarez MD, Nicole M. Dubosh MD, Yoon Soo Park PhD, Eric Shappell MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.11024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.11024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.
Objective
The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.
Methods
Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.
Results
Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.
Conclusions
Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
