Interinstitutional Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation in Korea: Need for Standardized Operational Protocols for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Consultation.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.3343/alm.2024.0218
Hyun-Ki Kim,Mikyoung Park,Jong Do Seo,Tae-Dong Jeong,Misuk Ji
{"title":"Interinstitutional Comparison of Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation in Korea: Need for Standardized Operational Protocols for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Consultation.","authors":"Hyun-Ki Kim,Mikyoung Park,Jong Do Seo,Tae-Dong Jeong,Misuk Ji","doi":"10.3343/alm.2024.0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vancomycin, a vital antibiotic for treating gram-positive bacterial infections, requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) because of its substantial pharmacokinetic variability. While traditional TDM relies on steady-state trough concentrations, recent guidelines advocate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the target index. However, detailed protocols for AUC estimation are lacking, leading to potential discrepancies among institutions. We surveyed medical institutions in Korea regarding vancomycin TDM, including AUC estimation. Nineteen participants responded to the TDM case challenge under three patient scenarios. For an ordinary patient in Case 1, the overall CV for AUC values was 0.4% when both trough and peak concentrations were included in the AUC calculation and 1.9% when utilizing only the trough concentration. For Case 2, an older patient with obesity, the corresponding CV was 6.6%. For Case 3 with multiple trough concentrations, the CV was 15.6%, reflecting variations in the selective use of data. Although the agreements in Case 1 were good, significant variability in AUC estimation was noted in cases involving atypical patient characteristics or old TDM data. Our study provides insight into the current status of vancomycin TDM in Korea and underscores the need for standardized operational protocols for AUC estimation.","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vancomycin, a vital antibiotic for treating gram-positive bacterial infections, requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) because of its substantial pharmacokinetic variability. While traditional TDM relies on steady-state trough concentrations, recent guidelines advocate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the target index. However, detailed protocols for AUC estimation are lacking, leading to potential discrepancies among institutions. We surveyed medical institutions in Korea regarding vancomycin TDM, including AUC estimation. Nineteen participants responded to the TDM case challenge under three patient scenarios. For an ordinary patient in Case 1, the overall CV for AUC values was 0.4% when both trough and peak concentrations were included in the AUC calculation and 1.9% when utilizing only the trough concentration. For Case 2, an older patient with obesity, the corresponding CV was 6.6%. For Case 3 with multiple trough concentrations, the CV was 15.6%, reflecting variations in the selective use of data. Although the agreements in Case 1 were good, significant variability in AUC estimation was noted in cases involving atypical patient characteristics or old TDM data. Our study provides insight into the current status of vancomycin TDM in Korea and underscores the need for standardized operational protocols for AUC estimation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国万古霉素浓度-时间曲线下面积估算的机构间比较:治疗药物监测咨询标准化操作规程的必要性》。
万古霉素是治疗革兰氏阳性细菌感染的一种重要抗生素,由于其药代动力学变异很大,因此需要进行治疗药物监测(TDM)。传统的 TDM 依赖于稳态谷浓度,而最近的指南则主张将浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)作为目标指标。然而,由于缺乏 AUC 估算的详细规程,导致各机构之间可能存在差异。我们就万古霉素 TDM(包括 AUC 估计)对韩国的医疗机构进行了调查。19 位参与者回答了三种患者情况下的 TDM 案例挑战。对于案例 1 中的一名普通患者,在计算 AUC 值时,如果同时计算波谷浓度和峰值浓度,则 AUC 值的总 CV 为 0.4%,如果只计算波谷浓度,则总 CV 为 1.9%。病例 2 是一名老年肥胖症患者,相应的 CV 值为 6.6%。病例 3 有多个谷浓度,CV 为 15.6%,反映了选择性使用数据的差异。虽然病例 1 的一致性很好,但在涉及非典型患者特征或旧 TDM 数据的病例中,AUC 估计值存在显著差异。我们的研究有助于深入了解韩国万古霉素 TDM 的现状,并强调了 AUC 估算标准化操作规程的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
期刊最新文献
Ability of the Capillary Electrophoresis-based HbA1c Assay to Detect Rare Hemoglobin Variants. Performance Evaluation of the LabGenius C-CT/NG-BMX Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Detection. The First Korean Case of MAN1B1-Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation Diagnosed Using Whole-exome Sequencing and Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry. Endogenous Thrombin Potential Level Helps Predict High Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. TP53 Mutation Status in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of Reclassification Based on the 5th WHO and International Consensus Classification Criteria: A Korean Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1