A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Single-Day Vital Signs, Laboratory Test Results, and International Classification of Disease-10 Block for Diagnosis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.3343/alm.2024.0315
Haeil Park, Chan Seok Park
{"title":"A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Single-Day Vital Signs, Laboratory Test Results, and International Classification of Disease-10 Block for Diagnosis.","authors":"Haeil Park, Chan Seok Park","doi":"10.3343/alm.2024.0315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is crucial for potentially reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. However, most models, which rely solely on vital signs, may not comprehensively capture the patients' risk profiles. We aimed to improve IHCA predictions by combining vital sign indicators with laboratory test results and, optionally, International Classification of Disease-10 block for diagnosis (ICD10BD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the general ward (GW) and intensive care unit (ICU) of a 680-bed secondary healthcare institution. We included 62,061 adults admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine from January 2010 to August 2022. IHCAs were identified based on cardiopulmonary resuscitation prescriptions. Patient-days within three days preceding IHCAs were labeled as case days; all others were control days. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained using daily vital signs, 14 laboratory test results, and ICD10BD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the GW, among 1,299,448 patient-days from 62,038 patients, 1,367 days linked to 713 patients were cases. In the ICU, among 117,190 patient-days from 16,881 patients, 1,119 days from 444 patients were cases. The area under the ROC curve for IHCA prediction model was 0.934 and 0.896 in the GW and ICU, respectively, using the combination of vital signs, laboratory test results, and ICD10BD; 0.925 and 0.878, respectively, with vital signs and laboratory test results; and 0.839 and 0.828, respectively, with only vital signs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating laboratory test results or combining laboratory test results and ICD10BD with vital signs as predictor variables in the XGBoost model potentially enhances clinical decision-making and improves patient outcomes in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is crucial for potentially reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes. However, most models, which rely solely on vital signs, may not comprehensively capture the patients' risk profiles. We aimed to improve IHCA predictions by combining vital sign indicators with laboratory test results and, optionally, International Classification of Disease-10 block for diagnosis (ICD10BD).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the general ward (GW) and intensive care unit (ICU) of a 680-bed secondary healthcare institution. We included 62,061 adults admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine from January 2010 to August 2022. IHCAs were identified based on cardiopulmonary resuscitation prescriptions. Patient-days within three days preceding IHCAs were labeled as case days; all others were control days. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was trained using daily vital signs, 14 laboratory test results, and ICD10BD.

Results: In the GW, among 1,299,448 patient-days from 62,038 patients, 1,367 days linked to 713 patients were cases. In the ICU, among 117,190 patient-days from 16,881 patients, 1,119 days from 444 patients were cases. The area under the ROC curve for IHCA prediction model was 0.934 and 0.896 in the GW and ICU, respectively, using the combination of vital signs, laboratory test results, and ICD10BD; 0.925 and 0.878, respectively, with vital signs and laboratory test results; and 0.839 and 0.828, respectively, with only vital signs.

Conclusions: Incorporating laboratory test results or combining laboratory test results and ICD10BD with vital signs as predictor variables in the XGBoost model potentially enhances clinical decision-making and improves patient outcomes in hospital settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用单日生命体征、实验室检测结果和国际疾病分类-10区块诊断预测院内心脏骤停的机器学习方法。
背景:预测院内心脏骤停(IHCA)对于潜在降低死亡率和改善患者预后至关重要。然而,大多数仅依赖生命体征的模型可能无法全面捕捉患者的风险概况。我们的目标是通过将生命体征指标与实验室检测结果以及可选的国际疾病分类-10块诊断(ICD10BD)相结合来提高IHCA预测。方法:我们对一家拥有680个床位的二级医疗机构的普通病房(GW)和重症监护病房(ICU)进行了回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了2010年1月至2022年8月在内科就诊的62,061名成年人。根据心肺复苏处方确定ihca。IHCAs前三天内的患者天数被标记为病例天数;其他都是控制日。极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型使用每日生命体征、14项实验室测试结果和ICD10BD进行训练。结果:在GW中,62,038例患者的1,299,448例患者日中,有1,367天与713例患者相关。在ICU,在16881名患者的117190个患者日中,有444名患者的1119个患者日出现病例。结合生命体征、实验室检测结果和ICD10BD, GW和ICU的IHCA预测模型的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.934和0.896;生命体征和化验结果分别为0.925、0.878;仅有生命体征时,分别为0.839和0.828。结论:在XGBoost模型中,将实验室检测结果或将实验室检测结果和ICD10BD与生命体征相结合作为预测变量,可能会提高临床决策,改善医院环境下的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes and Molecular Characteristics of Bacteroides fragilis Infections. TP53 Mutation Status in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of Reclassification Based on the 5th WHO and International Consensus Classification Criteria: A Korean Multicenter Study. Performance Evaluation of the LabGenius C-CT/NG-BMX Assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Detection. A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Using Single-Day Vital Signs, Laboratory Test Results, and International Classification of Disease-10 Block for Diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics: Enhancing Urine Test Accuracy Using a Mobile Phone-Based Reading System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1