Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels

Chenyu You;Weicheng Dai;Fenglin Liu;Yifei Min;Nicha C. Dvornek;Xiaoxiao Li;David A. Clifton;Lawrence Staib;James S. Duncan
{"title":"Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels","authors":"Chenyu You;Weicheng Dai;Fenglin Liu;Yifei Min;Nicha C. Dvornek;Xiaoxiao Li;David A. Clifton;Lawrence Staib;James S. Duncan","doi":"10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3461321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies on contrastive learning have achieved remarkable performance solely by leveraging few labels in medical image segmentation. Existing methods mainly focus on instance discrimination and invariant mapping. However, they face three common pitfalls: (1) tailness: medical image data usually follows an implicit long-tail class distribution. Blindly leveraging all pixels in training hence can lead to the data imbalance issues, and cause deteriorated performance; (2) consistency: it remains unclear whether a segmentation model has learned meaningful and yet consistent anatomical features due to the intra-class variations between different anatomical features; and (3) diversity: the intra-slice correlations within the entire dataset have received significantly less attention. This motivates us to seek a principled approach for strategically making use of the dataset itself to discover similar yet distinct samples from different anatomical views. In this paper, we introduce a novel semi-supervised medical image segmentation framework termed Mine y\n<bold>O</b>\nur ow\n<bold>N</b>\n Anatomy (\n<sc>MONA</small>\n), and make three contributions. First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features, mainly due to lacking the supervision signal. We show two simple solutions towards learning invariances. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features in an unsupervised manner. Lastly, we both empirically and theoretically, demonstrate the efficacy of our \n<sc>MONA</small>\n on three benchmark datasets with different labeled settings, achieving new state-of-the-art under different labeled semi-supervised settings.","PeriodicalId":94034,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10680394/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies on contrastive learning have achieved remarkable performance solely by leveraging few labels in medical image segmentation. Existing methods mainly focus on instance discrimination and invariant mapping. However, they face three common pitfalls: (1) tailness: medical image data usually follows an implicit long-tail class distribution. Blindly leveraging all pixels in training hence can lead to the data imbalance issues, and cause deteriorated performance; (2) consistency: it remains unclear whether a segmentation model has learned meaningful and yet consistent anatomical features due to the intra-class variations between different anatomical features; and (3) diversity: the intra-slice correlations within the entire dataset have received significantly less attention. This motivates us to seek a principled approach for strategically making use of the dataset itself to discover similar yet distinct samples from different anatomical views. In this paper, we introduce a novel semi-supervised medical image segmentation framework termed Mine y O ur ow N Anatomy ( MONA ), and make three contributions. First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features, mainly due to lacking the supervision signal. We show two simple solutions towards learning invariances. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features in an unsupervised manner. Lastly, we both empirically and theoretically, demonstrate the efficacy of our MONA on three benchmark datasets with different labeled settings, achieving new state-of-the-art under different labeled semi-supervised settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挖掘自己的解剖图利用极其有限的标签重新审视医学图像分割
最近关于对比学习的研究仅通过在医学图像分割中利用少量标签就取得了显著的性能。现有方法主要侧重于实例判别和不变映射。然而,它们面临着三个常见的缺陷:(1)尾部性:医学图像数据通常遵循隐含的长尾类分布。因此,盲目利用训练中的所有像素可能会导致数据不平衡问题,并导致性能下降;(2) 一致性:由于不同解剖特征之间存在类内差异,因此尚不清楚分割模型是否学习到了有意义且一致的解剖特征;(3) 多样性:整个数据集中的片内相关性受到的关注明显较少。这促使我们寻求一种有原则的方法,战略性地利用数据集本身来发现来自不同解剖视图的相似而又不同的样本。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新颖的半监督医学图像分割框架--Mine yOur owN Anatomy (MONA),并做出了三项贡献。首先,之前的工作认为每个像素对训练都同样重要;我们根据经验观察到,仅凭这一点不太可能定义有意义的解剖学特征,主要原因是缺乏监督信号。我们展示了学习不变量的两种简单解决方案。其次,我们构建了一套目标,鼓励模型能够以无监督的方式将医学图像分解为一系列解剖特征。最后,我们从经验和理论两方面证明了我们的 MONA 在三个基准数据集上的功效,这些数据集具有不同的标记设置,在不同的标记半监督设置下达到了新的一流水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EBMGC-GNF: Efficient Balanced Multi-View Graph Clustering via Good Neighbor Fusion. Integrating Neural-Symbolic Reasoning With Variational Causal Inference Network for Explanatory Visual Question Answering. Motion-Aware Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Video Compressive Sensing. Evaluation Metrics for Intelligent Generation of Graphical Game Assets: A Systematic Survey-Based Framework. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Tools for Improving Early Warning Systems of Volcanic Eruptions: The Case of Stromboli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1