Descriptive and rapid sensory profiling of wheat and wheat-sorghum biscuits fortified with longhorn grasshopper (Ruspolia differens) powder

Amos Kipkemoi Ronoh , Charlotte Atsango Serrem , Susan Balaba Tumwebaze , Gertrude Mercy Were
{"title":"Descriptive and rapid sensory profiling of wheat and wheat-sorghum biscuits fortified with longhorn grasshopper (Ruspolia differens) powder","authors":"Amos Kipkemoi Ronoh ,&nbsp;Charlotte Atsango Serrem ,&nbsp;Susan Balaba Tumwebaze ,&nbsp;Gertrude Mercy Were","doi":"10.1016/j.afres.2024.100504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protein Energy Malnutrition is a public health challenge that negatively affects young children in developing countries. Formulation of foods fortified with edible insects is a potentially sustainable approach to increase the protein quality in the diet of young children. Biscuits are a suitable fortification vehicle as they are popular among young children and have an extended shelf life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fortifying wheat and wheat-sorghum flours with <em>Ruspolia differens</em> powder (RDP) on sensory characteristics and acceptability of biscuits. Ten biscuit formulations were made by replacing part wheat and wheat-sorghum flours with 5, 15, 25, and 40 % RDP. Sensory evaluation was conducted using a descriptive panel to characterize the ten biscuit formulations, a Check-All-That-Apply questionnaire, and intent to buy. Principal component analysis for 38 attributes for biscuits scored by a descriptive sensory panel revealed that the first two principal components explained 82 % of the total variation where principal component 1 accounted for 60 % due to the cereal component, while 22 % (principal component 2) was due to concentration of grasshopper powder. Cluster analysis identified three distinct groups of consumers with similar biscuit preferences. The drivers of liking and intent to purchase biscuits are wheat based, with vanilla aroma and flavor, sweet flavor and baked biscuit aroma with a light colour. Compositing the biscuits with RDP imparts positive consumer attributes of crunchy texture and baked aroma. These protein rich biscuits have the potential to be used as a supplementary food because of the positive consumer attributes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8168,"journal":{"name":"Applied Food Research","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224001148/pdfft?md5=c568fa566af8b066064f91576822257a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772502224001148-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224001148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein Energy Malnutrition is a public health challenge that negatively affects young children in developing countries. Formulation of foods fortified with edible insects is a potentially sustainable approach to increase the protein quality in the diet of young children. Biscuits are a suitable fortification vehicle as they are popular among young children and have an extended shelf life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fortifying wheat and wheat-sorghum flours with Ruspolia differens powder (RDP) on sensory characteristics and acceptability of biscuits. Ten biscuit formulations were made by replacing part wheat and wheat-sorghum flours with 5, 15, 25, and 40 % RDP. Sensory evaluation was conducted using a descriptive panel to characterize the ten biscuit formulations, a Check-All-That-Apply questionnaire, and intent to buy. Principal component analysis for 38 attributes for biscuits scored by a descriptive sensory panel revealed that the first two principal components explained 82 % of the total variation where principal component 1 accounted for 60 % due to the cereal component, while 22 % (principal component 2) was due to concentration of grasshopper powder. Cluster analysis identified three distinct groups of consumers with similar biscuit preferences. The drivers of liking and intent to purchase biscuits are wheat based, with vanilla aroma and flavor, sweet flavor and baked biscuit aroma with a light colour. Compositing the biscuits with RDP imparts positive consumer attributes of crunchy texture and baked aroma. These protein rich biscuits have the potential to be used as a supplementary food because of the positive consumer attributes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长角蚱蜢粉强化小麦和小麦-高粱饼干的描述性和快速感官分析
蛋白质能量营养不良是一项公共卫生挑战,对发展中国家的幼儿造成不利影响。用可食用昆虫强化食品的配方是提高幼儿饮食中蛋白质质量的一种潜在的可持续方法。饼干是一种合适的强化剂,因为它深受幼儿喜爱,而且保质期较长。本研究旨在评估在小麦和小麦-高粱面粉中添加 Ruspolia differens 粉(RDP)对饼干感官特征和可接受性的影响。通过用 5%、15%、25% 和 40% 的 RDP 取代部分小麦和小麦-高粱粉,制作了 10 种饼干配方。感官评估采用了描述性面板来描述这十种饼干配方的特征、"检查-全部-适用 "问卷以及购买意向。描述性感官小组对饼干的 38 个属性进行的主成分分析表明,前两个主成分解释了总变异的 82%,其中主成分 1 占谷物成分的 60%,而 22%(主成分 2)是由于蚱蜢粉的浓度造成的。聚类分析确定了具有相似饼干偏好的三个不同的消费者群体。饼干的喜好和购买意向的驱动因素是以小麦为基础、具有香草香味和风味、甜味和色泽浅的烘焙饼干香味。在饼干中添加 RDP 会给消费者带来酥脆的口感和烘焙香味。这些富含蛋白质的饼干由于具有积极的消费者属性,有可能被用作辅助食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the potential of oleogels in edible applications and health impacts Research advancements in the purification technology and application of hen egg white lysozyme Bioactive potential of punicalagin: A comprehensive review The content of acrylamide in foods in Iran: A review of formation mechanism, toxicity and control strategies Optimization of a mixture using coffee parchment, Jamaica flower and Stevia for functional infusions - hypoglycemic and antioxidant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1