The concurrent validity of the physical activity vital sign and online physical activity logbook in adolescents with autism

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100632
Anke Arkesteyn , Véronique Cornelissen , Jean Steyaert , Davy Vancampfort , Tine Van Damme
{"title":"The concurrent validity of the physical activity vital sign and online physical activity logbook in adolescents with autism","authors":"Anke Arkesteyn ,&nbsp;Véronique Cornelissen ,&nbsp;Jean Steyaert ,&nbsp;Davy Vancampfort ,&nbsp;Tine Van Damme","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>There is an urgent need for valid assessment tools to assess physical activity (PA) levels in adolescents with autism. This study examines the concurrent validity of the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS) and Online Physical Activity Logbook (OPAL) with accelerometry in adolescents with autism. A secondary aim was to explore the association and agreement between self-perceived and objectively measured PA intensity levels.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-five adolescents with autism (71% males, Mdn = 14.0 (IQR = 13.0–15.5) years) completed the PAVS and OPAL and wore a wGT3X-BT ActiGraph accelerometer twice for seven consecutive days. Concurrent validity was assessed with Spearman correlations (ρ) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank/Paired Sample T-tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A poor association was found between the PAVS and accelerometry (ρ = .37). The PAVS overestimated moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) levels [Mdn = 152.1 min (IQR = 76.8–283.9), p &lt; .001]. Poor associations (ρ = −.06 up to −.45) were observed between the OPAL and accelerometry for time spent in sedentary behavior (SB), light PA (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), vigorous PA (VPA) and MVPA. No significant mean and median differences were found for SB and VPA between the two methods respectively. A moderate association was found between self-perceived (OPAL) and objectively measured (accelerometry) VPA (ρ = .60) and MVPA (ρ = .51), while those for LPA and MPA were poor (ρ &lt; .50). No significant median differences were found between self-perceived and objectively measured VPA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Clinicians and researchers should be very cautious in using the PAVS to assess MVPA levels in adolescents with autism, while the utility of the OPAL, in its current form, is questionable. Adolescents with autism may estimate PA at a vigorous intensity accurately. Future research should further focus on examining the psychometric properties of self-report PA instruments, as well as the ability of adolescents with autism to accurately estimate the intensity of performed PA's.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

There is an urgent need for valid assessment tools to assess physical activity (PA) levels in adolescents with autism. This study examines the concurrent validity of the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS) and Online Physical Activity Logbook (OPAL) with accelerometry in adolescents with autism. A secondary aim was to explore the association and agreement between self-perceived and objectively measured PA intensity levels.

Methods

Forty-five adolescents with autism (71% males, Mdn = 14.0 (IQR = 13.0–15.5) years) completed the PAVS and OPAL and wore a wGT3X-BT ActiGraph accelerometer twice for seven consecutive days. Concurrent validity was assessed with Spearman correlations (ρ) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank/Paired Sample T-tests.

Results

A poor association was found between the PAVS and accelerometry (ρ = .37). The PAVS overestimated moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) levels [Mdn = 152.1 min (IQR = 76.8–283.9), p < .001]. Poor associations (ρ = −.06 up to −.45) were observed between the OPAL and accelerometry for time spent in sedentary behavior (SB), light PA (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), vigorous PA (VPA) and MVPA. No significant mean and median differences were found for SB and VPA between the two methods respectively. A moderate association was found between self-perceived (OPAL) and objectively measured (accelerometry) VPA (ρ = .60) and MVPA (ρ = .51), while those for LPA and MPA were poor (ρ < .50). No significant median differences were found between self-perceived and objectively measured VPA.

Conclusion

Clinicians and researchers should be very cautious in using the PAVS to assess MVPA levels in adolescents with autism, while the utility of the OPAL, in its current form, is questionable. Adolescents with autism may estimate PA at a vigorous intensity accurately. Future research should further focus on examining the psychometric properties of self-report PA instruments, as well as the ability of adolescents with autism to accurately estimate the intensity of performed PA's.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症青少年体力活动生命体征和在线体力活动日志的并发有效性
背景和目的目前迫切需要有效的评估工具来评估自闭症青少年的体育活动(PA)水平。本研究探讨了自闭症青少年的体力活动生命体征(PAVS)和在线体力活动日志(OPAL)与加速度测量法的并发有效性。方法45名患有自闭症的青少年(71%为男性,Mdn=14.0(IQR=13.0-15.5)岁)完成了体力活动生命体征(PAVS)和在线体力活动日志(OPAL),并连续七天两次佩戴wGT3X-BT ActiGraph加速度计。通过斯皮尔曼相关性(ρ)和Wilcoxon Signed Rank/配对样本T检验对并发有效性进行了评估。结果发现,PAVS和加速度计之间的关联性很差(ρ = .37)。PAVS 高估了中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)水平[Mdn = 152.1 分钟(IQR = 76.8-283.9),p < .001]。在久坐行为(SB)、轻度 PA(LPA)、中度 PA(MPA)、剧烈 PA(VPA)和 MVPA 所花费的时间方面,观察到 OPAL 与加速度测量之间的关联性较差(ρ = -.06 至 -.45)。两种方法在久坐行为(SB)和剧烈运动时间(VPA)的平均值和中位数上分别没有发现明显差异。在自我感觉(OPAL)和客观测量(加速度计)的 VPA(ρ = .60)和 MVPA(ρ = .51)之间发现了中等程度的相关性,而 LPA 和 MPA 的相关性较差(ρ < .50)。结论临床医生和研究人员在使用 PAVS 评估自闭症青少年的 MVPA 水平时应非常谨慎,而 OPAL 目前形式的实用性也值得怀疑。自闭症青少年可能会准确估计剧烈运动强度。未来的研究应进一步关注自我报告 PA 工具的心理测量特性,以及自闭症青少年准确估计所做 PA 强度的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1