Modified peri-areolar mastopexy and fat grafting in complex breast ptosis: A randomized open-label controlled trial

{"title":"Modified peri-areolar mastopexy and fat grafting in complex breast ptosis: A randomized open-label controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Complex breast ptosis may be caused by moderate to severe degrees of skin and glandular sagging associated with breast and nipple-areola complex (NAC) asymmetries and deformities. The use of traditional peri-areolar mastopexy (t-PM) with or without implants is limited only to mild or moderate breast ptosis.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to report the safety and efficacy of the modified peri-areolar mastopexy (m-PM) characterized by a vertical shift of the classical pattern with implants and fat grafting (FG) in complex breast ptosis and to evaluate the influence of breast and NAC asymmetries, breast, and chest deformities on aesthetics outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An open-label randomized controlled trial was performed. Forty women (study group - SG) affected by breast ptosis (moderate and severe), asymmetries, and deformities were treated with m-PM, implants, and FG, and their outcomes were compared with those in a control group (CG) (n = 35) treated with t-PM and implants. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using the patient’s satisfaction grade, physician’s assessment score, and visual Analog Scale (VAS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 75% (n = 30) of SG patients reported excellent results in terms of breast lift, shape, volume, NAC position, and scar quality after 12 months, whereas the CG reported the same outcomes in 60% (n = 21) of the cases. SG patients showed a vertical NAC shift and a satisfaction degree higher than that in the CG (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 vs. CG).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The m-PM with implants and FG was found to be safe and effective in this trial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005497/pdfft?md5=48f4492945e163dde3f4479deff57bf0&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524005497-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Complex breast ptosis may be caused by moderate to severe degrees of skin and glandular sagging associated with breast and nipple-areola complex (NAC) asymmetries and deformities. The use of traditional peri-areolar mastopexy (t-PM) with or without implants is limited only to mild or moderate breast ptosis.

Objectives

This study aimed to report the safety and efficacy of the modified peri-areolar mastopexy (m-PM) characterized by a vertical shift of the classical pattern with implants and fat grafting (FG) in complex breast ptosis and to evaluate the influence of breast and NAC asymmetries, breast, and chest deformities on aesthetics outcomes.

Methods

An open-label randomized controlled trial was performed. Forty women (study group - SG) affected by breast ptosis (moderate and severe), asymmetries, and deformities were treated with m-PM, implants, and FG, and their outcomes were compared with those in a control group (CG) (n = 35) treated with t-PM and implants. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using the patient’s satisfaction grade, physician’s assessment score, and visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Results

Overall, 75% (n = 30) of SG patients reported excellent results in terms of breast lift, shape, volume, NAC position, and scar quality after 12 months, whereas the CG reported the same outcomes in 60% (n = 21) of the cases. SG patients showed a vertical NAC shift and a satisfaction degree higher than that in the CG (p < 0.001 vs. CG).

Conclusions

The m-PM with implants and FG was found to be safe and effective in this trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良乳晕周围乳房整形术和脂肪移植术治疗复杂乳房下垂:随机开放标签对照试验
背景复杂性乳房下垂可能由中度到重度的皮肤和腺体下垂引起,并伴有乳房和乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)不对称和畸形。传统的乳晕周围乳房整形术(t-PM)无论是否植入假体,都仅限于轻度或中度乳房下垂。本研究旨在报告改良乳晕周围乳房整形术(m-PM)的安全性和有效性,其特点是在复杂乳房下垂的情况下,通过植入物和脂肪移植(FG)实现传统模式的垂直移位,并评估乳房和 NAC 不对称、乳房和胸部畸形对美学效果的影响。40 名受乳房下垂(中度和重度)、不对称和畸形影响的女性(研究组 - SG)接受了 m-PM、植入物和 FG 治疗,并将其结果与接受 t-PM 和植入物治疗的对照组(CG)(n = 35)的结果进行了比较。结果总的来说,75% 的 SG 患者(30 人)在 12 个月后在乳房提升、形状、体积、NAC 位置和疤痕质量方面都获得了极佳的效果,而对照组有 60% 的患者(21 人)获得了相同的效果。SG 患者的 NAC 垂直移位和满意度均高于 CG(P < 0.001 vs. CG)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of cosmetic tourism across one year on an NHS breast surgery unit The roles of extracranial intravascular lesion, vasodilation-induced neural entrapment, and arteriolysis in migraine treatment Nail reconstruction using an osteo-onychocutaneous flap with the dorsal digital artery of the hallux as the pedicle: Techniques and anatomical insights Reduction mammaplasty relieves depression in women with macromastia: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1