Prevalence and Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence Among Women and Men in Mexico: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Trauma Violence & Abuse Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/15248380241271345
Jude Mary Cénat, Laetitia Mélissande Amédée, Olivia Onesi, Wina Paul Darius, Raina Barara, Daniela González Villarreal, Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moshirian Farahi, Patrick R. Labelle, Martine Hébert
{"title":"Prevalence and Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence Among Women and Men in Mexico: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Jude Mary Cénat, Laetitia Mélissande Amédée, Olivia Onesi, Wina Paul Darius, Raina Barara, Daniela González Villarreal, Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moshirian Farahi, Patrick R. Labelle, Martine Hébert","doi":"10.1177/15248380241271345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and correlates of different forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) among women and men in Mexico. To identify studies, a comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed across 11 databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science). From the 1,746 studies screened, 155 full-text articles were reviewed, and this systematic review included 27 studies involving 249,557 participants to determine the prevalence of physical, psychological, sexual, threats, and other forms of IPV, according to gender and other sociodemographic characteristics. Overall IPV prevalence was 16.4%, with significant differences across pregnant and non-pregnant women. Physical IPV prevalence was 14.7%, revealing higher rates in men (29.5%) compared to women (14.2%). Psychological IPV prevalence was 27.3% and sexual IPV was at 6.6%, with differences across evaluation periods. Threats and other IPV forms showed a prevalence rate of 14.2% and 21.5%. Meta-regression analyses included gender, education, marital status, rural residency, pregnancy, age, and evaluation period. This study demonstrates that IPV is a critical public health concern in Mexico, impacting both women and men. It shows the vulnerability of rural residents, youth, and pregnant women. However, understanding IPV complexities in Mexico requires nuanced considerations of demographic and situational contexts. Urgent initiatives from municipal, state, and federal governments are needed to combat IPV, focusing on prevention and support for affected individuals.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241271345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and correlates of different forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) among women and men in Mexico. To identify studies, a comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed across 11 databases (Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science). From the 1,746 studies screened, 155 full-text articles were reviewed, and this systematic review included 27 studies involving 249,557 participants to determine the prevalence of physical, psychological, sexual, threats, and other forms of IPV, according to gender and other sociodemographic characteristics. Overall IPV prevalence was 16.4%, with significant differences across pregnant and non-pregnant women. Physical IPV prevalence was 14.7%, revealing higher rates in men (29.5%) compared to women (14.2%). Psychological IPV prevalence was 27.3% and sexual IPV was at 6.6%, with differences across evaluation periods. Threats and other IPV forms showed a prevalence rate of 14.2% and 21.5%. Meta-regression analyses included gender, education, marital status, rural residency, pregnancy, age, and evaluation period. This study demonstrates that IPV is a critical public health concern in Mexico, impacting both women and men. It shows the vulnerability of rural residents, youth, and pregnant women. However, understanding IPV complexities in Mexico requires nuanced considerations of demographic and situational contexts. Urgent initiatives from municipal, state, and federal governments are needed to combat IPV, focusing on prevention and support for affected individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥女性和男性中亲密伴侣暴力的发生率和相关因素:系统回顾与元分析
本文首次对墨西哥女性和男性中不同形式的亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的发生率及其相关因素进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。为了确定研究内容,我们制定了一项全面的检索策略,并在 11 个数据库(Academic Search Complete、APA PsycInfo、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL、Embase、International Bibliography of the Social Sciences、LILACS、MEDLINE、SciELO、Sociological Abstracts、Web of Science)中执行。从筛选出的 1746 项研究中,我们对 155 篇全文文章进行了审查,本系统性综述共纳入 27 项研究,涉及 249,557 名参与者,以根据性别和其他社会人口特征确定身体、心理、性、威胁和其他形式 IPV 的流行率。总体 IPV 发生率为 16.4%,孕妇和非孕妇之间存在显著差异。身体方面的 IPV 发生率为 14.7%,其中男性的发生率(29.5%)高于女性(14.2%)。心理方面的 IPV 发生率为 27.3%,性方面的 IPV 发生率为 6.6%,不同评估时期的发生率存在差异。威胁和其他形式的 IPV 发生率分别为 14.2% 和 21.5%。元回归分析包括性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、农村居住地、怀孕、年龄和评估期。这项研究表明,在墨西哥,IPV 是一个严重的公共卫生问题,对女性和男性都有影响。它显示了农村居民、青年和孕妇的脆弱性。然而,要了解墨西哥 IPV 的复杂性,需要对人口和环境背景进行细致入微的考虑。市、州和联邦政府需要采取紧急措施打击 IPV,重点是预防和支持受影响的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Landscape of Trauma-Informed Care in Social Work: A Critical Scoping Review. The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cognitive Control Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies Protective and Promotive Factors in Migrant and Refugee Children Facing Violence: A Systematic Review Psychological Predictors of Recidivism for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Systematic Scoping Review Outcomes Associated with Arrest for Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1