Moral orders of pleasing the algorithm

IF 4.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION New Media & Society Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/14614448241278674
Jesse Haapoja, Laura Savolainen, Hanna Reinikainen, Tuukka Lehtiniemi
{"title":"Moral orders of pleasing the algorithm","authors":"Jesse Haapoja, Laura Savolainen, Hanna Reinikainen, Tuukka Lehtiniemi","doi":"10.1177/14614448241278674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how ‘pleasing the algorithm’, or engaging with algorithms to gain rewards such as visibility for one’s content on digital platforms, is treated from a moral perspective. Drawing from Harré’s work on moral orders, our qualitative analysis of Reddit messages focused on social media content creation illustrates how so-called folk theories of algorithms are used for moral evaluations about the responsibilities and worthiness of different actors. Moral judgements of the actions of content creators encompass ideas of individuals and their agency in relation to algorithmic systems, and these ideas influence the assessment of algorithm-pleasing as an integral part of the craft, as condemnable behaviour, or as a necessary evil. In this way, the feedback loops that arrange people and code into algorithmic systems inevitably make theories about those systems also theories about humans and their behaviour and agency.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241278674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how ‘pleasing the algorithm’, or engaging with algorithms to gain rewards such as visibility for one’s content on digital platforms, is treated from a moral perspective. Drawing from Harré’s work on moral orders, our qualitative analysis of Reddit messages focused on social media content creation illustrates how so-called folk theories of algorithms are used for moral evaluations about the responsibilities and worthiness of different actors. Moral judgements of the actions of content creators encompass ideas of individuals and their agency in relation to algorithmic systems, and these ideas influence the assessment of algorithm-pleasing as an integral part of the craft, as condemnable behaviour, or as a necessary evil. In this way, the feedback loops that arrange people and code into algorithmic systems inevitably make theories about those systems also theories about humans and their behaviour and agency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取悦算法的道德命令
本文探讨了如何从道德角度看待 "取悦算法",即通过与算法打交道来获得回报(如个人内容在数字平台上的知名度)。借鉴哈雷关于道德秩序的研究,我们对 Reddit 上关于社交媒体内容创作的信息进行了定性分析,说明了所谓的民间算法理论是如何被用于对不同行为者的责任和价值进行道德评价的。对内容创作者行为的道德评判包含了个人及其与算法系统相关的代理权的观念,而这些观念影响了对算法的评价,将其视为工艺的组成部分、应受谴责的行为或必要之恶。这样,将人和代码安排到算法系统中的反馈回路不可避免地使关于这些系统的理论也成为关于人类及其行为和能动性的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
The journalists’ exodus: Navigating the transition from Twitter to Mastodon and other alternative platforms Explaining public communication change: A structure–actor model Memeability and sharenting: The affective economy of children on social media Locked among inequalities: A study of children’s digital experiences and digital divide during the COVID-19 pandemic Catch 22: Institutional ethics and researcher welfare within online extremism and terrorism research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1