Yang Chen, Fei He, Fan Wu, Xiaolong Hu, Wanfu Zhang, Shaohui Li, Hao Zhang, Weixun Duan, Hao Guan
{"title":"Developing a calculable risk prediction model for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: a retrospective study","authors":"Yang Chen, Fei He, Fan Wu, Xiaolong Hu, Wanfu Zhang, Shaohui Li, Hao Zhang, Weixun Duan, Hao Guan","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Diagnosing sternal wound infection (SWI) following median sternotomy remains laborious and troublesome, resulting in high mortality rates and great harm to patients. Early intervention and prevention are critical and challenging. This study aimed to develop a simple risk prediction model to identify high-risk populations of SWI and to guide examination programs and intervention strategies. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data obtained from 6715 patients who underwent median sternotomy between January 2016 and December 2020. The least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression method selected the optimal subset of predictors, and multivariate logistic regression helped screen the significant factors. The nomogram model was built based on all significant factors. Area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. Results LASSO regression analysis selected an optimal subset containing nine predictors that were all statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent risk factors of SWI included female [odds ratio (OR) = 3.405, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.535–4.573], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 4.679, 95% CI = 2.916–7.508), drinking (OR = 2.025, 95% CI = 1.437–2.855), smoking (OR = 7.059, 95% CI = 5.034–9.898), re-operation (OR = 3.235, 95% CI = 1.087–9.623), heart failure (OR = 1.555, 95% CI = 1.200–2.016) and repeated endotracheal intubation (OR = 1.975, 95% CI = 1.405–2.774). Protective factors included bone wax (OR = 0.674, 95% CI = 0.538–0.843) and chest physiotherapy (OR = 0.446, 95% CI = 0.248–0.802). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.770 (95% CI = 0.745–0.795) with relatively good sensitivity (0.798) and accuracy (0.620), exhibiting moderately good discernment. The model also showed an excellent fitting degree on the calibration curve. Finally, the DCA presented a remarkable net benefit. Conclusions A visual and convenient nomogram-based risk calculator built on disease-associated predictors might help clinicians with the early identification of high-risk patients of SWI and timely intervention.","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Diagnosing sternal wound infection (SWI) following median sternotomy remains laborious and troublesome, resulting in high mortality rates and great harm to patients. Early intervention and prevention are critical and challenging. This study aimed to develop a simple risk prediction model to identify high-risk populations of SWI and to guide examination programs and intervention strategies. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data obtained from 6715 patients who underwent median sternotomy between January 2016 and December 2020. The least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression method selected the optimal subset of predictors, and multivariate logistic regression helped screen the significant factors. The nomogram model was built based on all significant factors. Area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. Results LASSO regression analysis selected an optimal subset containing nine predictors that were all statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent risk factors of SWI included female [odds ratio (OR) = 3.405, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.535–4.573], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 4.679, 95% CI = 2.916–7.508), drinking (OR = 2.025, 95% CI = 1.437–2.855), smoking (OR = 7.059, 95% CI = 5.034–9.898), re-operation (OR = 3.235, 95% CI = 1.087–9.623), heart failure (OR = 1.555, 95% CI = 1.200–2.016) and repeated endotracheal intubation (OR = 1.975, 95% CI = 1.405–2.774). Protective factors included bone wax (OR = 0.674, 95% CI = 0.538–0.843) and chest physiotherapy (OR = 0.446, 95% CI = 0.248–0.802). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.770 (95% CI = 0.745–0.795) with relatively good sensitivity (0.798) and accuracy (0.620), exhibiting moderately good discernment. The model also showed an excellent fitting degree on the calibration curve. Finally, the DCA presented a remarkable net benefit. Conclusions A visual and convenient nomogram-based risk calculator built on disease-associated predictors might help clinicians with the early identification of high-risk patients of SWI and timely intervention.
期刊介绍:
The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.