Developing a calculable risk prediction model for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: a retrospective study

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Burns & Trauma Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkae031
Yang Chen, Fei He, Fan Wu, Xiaolong Hu, Wanfu Zhang, Shaohui Li, Hao Zhang, Weixun Duan, Hao Guan
{"title":"Developing a calculable risk prediction model for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: a retrospective study","authors":"Yang Chen, Fei He, Fan Wu, Xiaolong Hu, Wanfu Zhang, Shaohui Li, Hao Zhang, Weixun Duan, Hao Guan","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Diagnosing sternal wound infection (SWI) following median sternotomy remains laborious and troublesome, resulting in high mortality rates and great harm to patients. Early intervention and prevention are critical and challenging. This study aimed to develop a simple risk prediction model to identify high-risk populations of SWI and to guide examination programs and intervention strategies. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data obtained from 6715 patients who underwent median sternotomy between January 2016 and December 2020. The least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression method selected the optimal subset of predictors, and multivariate logistic regression helped screen the significant factors. The nomogram model was built based on all significant factors. Area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. Results LASSO regression analysis selected an optimal subset containing nine predictors that were all statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent risk factors of SWI included female [odds ratio (OR) = 3.405, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.535–4.573], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 4.679, 95% CI = 2.916–7.508), drinking (OR = 2.025, 95% CI = 1.437–2.855), smoking (OR = 7.059, 95% CI = 5.034–9.898), re-operation (OR = 3.235, 95% CI = 1.087–9.623), heart failure (OR = 1.555, 95% CI = 1.200–2.016) and repeated endotracheal intubation (OR = 1.975, 95% CI = 1.405–2.774). Protective factors included bone wax (OR = 0.674, 95% CI = 0.538–0.843) and chest physiotherapy (OR = 0.446, 95% CI = 0.248–0.802). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.770 (95% CI = 0.745–0.795) with relatively good sensitivity (0.798) and accuracy (0.620), exhibiting moderately good discernment. The model also showed an excellent fitting degree on the calibration curve. Finally, the DCA presented a remarkable net benefit. Conclusions A visual and convenient nomogram-based risk calculator built on disease-associated predictors might help clinicians with the early identification of high-risk patients of SWI and timely intervention.","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Diagnosing sternal wound infection (SWI) following median sternotomy remains laborious and troublesome, resulting in high mortality rates and great harm to patients. Early intervention and prevention are critical and challenging. This study aimed to develop a simple risk prediction model to identify high-risk populations of SWI and to guide examination programs and intervention strategies. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data obtained from 6715 patients who underwent median sternotomy between January 2016 and December 2020. The least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression method selected the optimal subset of predictors, and multivariate logistic regression helped screen the significant factors. The nomogram model was built based on all significant factors. Area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's performance. Results LASSO regression analysis selected an optimal subset containing nine predictors that were all statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent risk factors of SWI included female [odds ratio (OR) = 3.405, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.535–4.573], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 4.679, 95% CI = 2.916–7.508), drinking (OR = 2.025, 95% CI = 1.437–2.855), smoking (OR = 7.059, 95% CI = 5.034–9.898), re-operation (OR = 3.235, 95% CI = 1.087–9.623), heart failure (OR = 1.555, 95% CI = 1.200–2.016) and repeated endotracheal intubation (OR = 1.975, 95% CI = 1.405–2.774). Protective factors included bone wax (OR = 0.674, 95% CI = 0.538–0.843) and chest physiotherapy (OR = 0.446, 95% CI = 0.248–0.802). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.770 (95% CI = 0.745–0.795) with relatively good sensitivity (0.798) and accuracy (0.620), exhibiting moderately good discernment. The model also showed an excellent fitting degree on the calibration curve. Finally, the DCA presented a remarkable net benefit. Conclusions A visual and convenient nomogram-based risk calculator built on disease-associated predictors might help clinicians with the early identification of high-risk patients of SWI and timely intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发胸骨正中切开术后胸骨伤口感染的可计算风险预测模型:一项回顾性研究
背景 诊断胸骨正中切开术后的胸骨伤口感染(SWI)仍然费力而麻烦,导致死亡率高,对患者造成极大伤害。早期干预和预防至关重要,也极具挑战性。本研究旨在建立一个简单的风险预测模型,以确定 SWI 的高危人群,并指导检查项目和干预策略。方法 对2016年1月至2020年12月期间接受胸骨正中切开术的6715名患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析。最小绝对缩小和选择算子(LASSO)回归法选出了最佳预测因子子集,多变量逻辑回归帮助筛选出了重要的因素。根据所有重要因素建立了提名图模型。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。结果 LASSO 回归分析选出了一个最佳子集,该子集包含 9 个预测因子,这些因子在多元逻辑回归分析中均具有统计学意义。SWI的独立风险因素包括女性[几率比(OR)= 3.405,95% 置信区间(CI)= 2.535-4.573]、慢性阻塞性肺病(OR = 4.679,95% CI = 2.916-7.508)、饮酒(OR = 2.025,95% CI = 1.437-2.855)、吸烟(OR = 7.059,95% CI = 5.034-9.898)、再次手术(OR = 3.235,95% CI = 1.087-9.623)、心力衰竭(OR = 1.555,95% CI = 1.200-2.016)和反复气管插管(OR = 1.975,95% CI = 1.405-2.774)。保护因素包括骨蜡(OR = 0.674,95% CI = 0.538-0.843)和胸部理疗(OR = 0.446,95% CI = 0.248-0.802)。提名图的 AUC 为 0.770(95% CI = 0.745-0.795),灵敏度(0.798)和准确度(0.620)相对较好,显示出中等水平的辨别能力。该模型在校准曲线上的拟合度也很高。最后,DCA 显示出显著的净效益。结论 基于疾病相关预测因子的可视化、便捷的提名图风险计算器可帮助临床医生早期识别 SWI 高危患者并及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Burns & Trauma
Burns & Trauma 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.
期刊最新文献
Developing a calculable risk prediction model for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: a retrospective study BRD3308 suppresses macrophage oxidative stress and pyroptosis via upregulating acetylation of H3K27 in sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Reshaped commensal wound microbiome via topical application of Calvatia gigantea extract contributes to faster diabetic wound healing. Applications of mesenchymal stem cell-exosome components in wound infection healing: new insights. Adipose stem cell-derived exosomes in the treatment of wound healing in preclinical animal models: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1