Conflicts of neutrality: Exploring definitions, values, and practices among Canadian academic librarians

Abstract

Library neutrality, often considered a core value of librarianship, has been facing growing opposition in recent years, but little research exists on how it is being defined and prioritized by practicing librarians. Normally more of a concern in public libraries, increased politicization of academic spaces is bringing the neutrality debate to college and university libraries. This article presents the results of a survey of Canadian academic librarians' attitudes towards library neutrality, including how they define, value and practice neutrality. It is found that Canadian academic librarians most commonly define neutrality as “not taking a side” and that ambivalent and negative conceptions of neutrality are prevalent. Neutrality is largely considered to be impossible and unethical, and seen as significantly less valuable than other library values such as access to information and social responsibility. The unfavourable conceptions and low value attached to neutrality are reflected in Canadian academic librarians' actions and practice. Many librarians are purposely contravening the principle of neutrality by acting in ways that they consider non-neutral, with social justice is a frequent impetus for non-neutral action.