Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-080133
Simone Cornelisse, Kathrin Fleischer, Lucette van der Westerlaken, Jan-Peter de Bruin, Carlijn Vergouw, Carolien Koks, Josien Derhaag, Jantien Visser, Jannie van Echten-Arends, Els Slappendel, Brigitte Arends, Moniek van der Zanden, Angelique van Dongen, Janneke Brink-van der Vlugt, Marcella de Hundt, Max Curfs, Harold Verhoeve, Maaike Traas-Hofmans, Yvonne Wurth, Petra Manger, Quirine Pieterse, Didi Braat, Madelon van Wely, Liliana Ramos, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
{"title":"Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial","authors":"Simone Cornelisse, Kathrin Fleischer, Lucette van der Westerlaken, Jan-Peter de Bruin, Carlijn Vergouw, Carolien Koks, Josien Derhaag, Jantien Visser, Jannie van Echten-Arends, Els Slappendel, Brigitte Arends, Moniek van der Zanden, Angelique van Dongen, Janneke Brink-van der Vlugt, Marcella de Hundt, Max Curfs, Harold Verhoeve, Maaike Traas-Hofmans, Yvonne Wurth, Petra Manger, Quirine Pieterse, Didi Braat, Madelon van Wely, Liliana Ramos, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-080133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate whether embryo transfers at blastocyst stage improve the cumulative live birth rate after oocyte retrieval, including both fresh and frozen-thawed transfers, and whether the risk of obstetric and perinatal complications is increased compared with cleavage stage embryo transfers during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting 21 hospitals and clinics in the Netherlands, 18 August 2018 to 17 December 2021. Participants 1202 women with at least four embryos available on day 2 after oocyte retrieval were randomly assigned to either blastocyst stage embryo transfer (n=603) or cleavage stage embryo transfer (n=599). Interventions In the blastocyst group and cleavage group, embryo transfers were performed on day 5 and day 3, respectively, after oocyte retrieval, followed by cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with secondary analyses as per protocol. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval, including results of all frozen-thawed embryo transfers within a year after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included cumulative rates of pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth after fresh embryo transfer, number of embryo transfers needed, number of frozen embryos, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Results The cumulative live birth rate did not differ between the blastocyst group and cleavage group (58.9% (355 of 603) v 58.4% (350 of 599; risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.22). The blastocyst group showed a higher live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer (1.26, 1.00 to 1.58), lower cumulative pregnancy loss rate (0.68, 0.51 to 0.89), and lower mean number of embryo transfers needed to result in a live birth (1.55 v 1.82; P<0.001). The incidence of moderate preterm birth (32 to <37 weeks) in singletons was higher in the blastocyst group (1.87, 1.05 to 3.34). Conclusion Blastocyst stage embryo transfers resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate to cleavage stage embryo transfers in women with at least four embryos available during IVF treatment. Trial registration International Clinical Trial Registry Platform NTR7034. Restricted access to the study data can be arranged on request to the corresponding author. Written proposals will be assessed by the ToF study group. A data sharing agreement including terms and conditions for authorship and publication will need to be signed before data are available.","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate whether embryo transfers at blastocyst stage improve the cumulative live birth rate after oocyte retrieval, including both fresh and frozen-thawed transfers, and whether the risk of obstetric and perinatal complications is increased compared with cleavage stage embryo transfers during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial. Setting 21 hospitals and clinics in the Netherlands, 18 August 2018 to 17 December 2021. Participants 1202 women with at least four embryos available on day 2 after oocyte retrieval were randomly assigned to either blastocyst stage embryo transfer (n=603) or cleavage stage embryo transfer (n=599). Interventions In the blastocyst group and cleavage group, embryo transfers were performed on day 5 and day 3, respectively, after oocyte retrieval, followed by cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with secondary analyses as per protocol. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval, including results of all frozen-thawed embryo transfers within a year after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included cumulative rates of pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth after fresh embryo transfer, number of embryo transfers needed, number of frozen embryos, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Results The cumulative live birth rate did not differ between the blastocyst group and cleavage group (58.9% (355 of 603) v 58.4% (350 of 599; risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.22). The blastocyst group showed a higher live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer (1.26, 1.00 to 1.58), lower cumulative pregnancy loss rate (0.68, 0.51 to 0.89), and lower mean number of embryo transfers needed to result in a live birth (1.55 v 1.82; P<0.001). The incidence of moderate preterm birth (32 to <37 weeks) in singletons was higher in the blastocyst group (1.87, 1.05 to 3.34). Conclusion Blastocyst stage embryo transfers resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate to cleavage stage embryo transfers in women with at least four embryos available during IVF treatment. Trial registration International Clinical Trial Registry Platform NTR7034. Restricted access to the study data can be arranged on request to the corresponding author. Written proposals will be assessed by the ToF study group. A data sharing agreement including terms and conditions for authorship and publication will need to be signed before data are available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预后良好妇女体外受精过程中囊胚与卵裂期胚胎移植政策的累积活产率:多中心随机对照试验
目的 评估囊胚期胚胎移植(包括新鲜和冷冻解冻移植)是否能提高卵母细胞取出后的累积活产率,以及与体外受精(IVF)治疗过程中的卵裂期胚胎移植相比,产科和围产期并发症的风险是否会增加。设计 多中心随机对照试验。地点 荷兰 21 家医院和诊所,2018 年 8 月 18 日至 2021 年 12 月 17 日。参与者 1202 名妇女在取卵后第 2 天至少有四个胚胎可用,被随机分配到囊胚期胚胎移植(n=603)或卵裂期胚胎移植(n=599)。在囊胚期组和卵裂期组,分别在取卵后第 5 天和第 3 天进行胚胎移植,然后对剩余胚胎进行冷冻保存。分析以意向治疗为基础,并根据方案进行二次分析。主要结果测量 主要结果是每次取卵的累积活产率,包括随机化后一年内所有冷冻解冻胚胎的移植结果。次要结果包括新鲜胚胎移植后的累积妊娠率、妊娠丢失率和活产率、所需胚胎移植数量、冷冻胚胎数量以及产科和围产期结果。结果 囊胚组和裂解组的累积活产率没有差异(58.9%(603 例中的 355 例)v 58.4%(599 例中的 350 例;风险比 1.01,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.84 至 1.22)。囊胚组在新鲜胚胎移植后的活产率更高(1.26,1.00 至 1.58),累积妊娠损失率更低(0.68,0.51 至 0.89),活产所需的平均胚胎移植次数更少(1.55 对 1.82;P<0.001)。囊胚组单胎中度早产(32 至小于 37 周)的发生率更高(1.87,1.05 至 3.34)。结论 在试管婴儿治疗期间至少有四个胚胎可用的妇女中,囊胚期胚胎移植的累积活产率与卵裂期胚胎移植相似。试验注册 国际临床试验注册平台 NTR7034。如需查阅研究数据,可向通讯作者提出申请。ToF研究小组将对书面建议进行评估。在提供数据之前,需要签署一份数据共享协议,其中包括作者和出版条款和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leprosy: Jordan becomes first country to eliminate disease. Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates-not false promises. Abolish NHS England and overhaul management to improve NHS productivity, says think tank. Optimising inhaled therapy for patients with asthma. Are India's regulatory gaps leaving patients with substandard mental health counsellors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1