Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape

IF 5.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy & Astrophysics Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/202450957
A. Castro-González, V. Bourrier, J. Lillo-Box, J.-B. Delisle, D. J. Armstrong, D. Barrado, A. C. M. Correia
{"title":"Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape","authors":"A. Castro-González, V. Bourrier, J. Lillo-Box, J.-B. Delisle, D. J. Armstrong, D. Barrado, A. C. M. Correia","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202450957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context<i/>. Atmospheric and dynamical processes are thought to play a major role in shaping the distribution of close-in exoplanets. A striking feature of such distribution is the Neptunian desert, a dearth of Neptunes on the shortest-period orbits.<i>Aims<i/>. We aimed to define the boundaries of the Neptunian desert and study its transition into the savanna, a moderately populated region at larger orbital distances. Our goal was to acquire new insight into the processes that carved out the Neptunian landscape, and to provide the exoplanet community with a framework for conducting studies on planet formation and evolution.<i>Methods<i/>. We built a sample of planets and candidates based on the <i>Kepler<i/> DR25 catalogue and weighed it according to the transit and detection probabilities. We then used the corrected distribution to study occurrences across the period and period-radius spaces. <i>Results<i/>. We delimited the Neptunian desert as the close-in region of the period-radius space with no planets at a 3<i>σ<i/> level, and provide the community with simple, ready-to-use approximate boundaries. We identified an overdensity of planets separating the Neptunian desert from the savanna (3.2 days ⪅ <i>P<i/><sub>orb<sub/> ⪅ 5.7 days) that stands out at a 4.7σ level above the desert and at a 3.5σ level above the savanna, which we propose to call the Neptunian ridge. The period range of the ridge matches that of the well-known hot Jupiter pileup (≃3–5 days), which suggests that similar evolutionary processes might act on both populations. We find that the occurrence fraction between the pileup and warm Jupiters (ƒ<sub>pileup/warm<sub/> = 5.3 ± 1.1) is about twice that between the Neptunian ridge and savanna (ƒ<sub>ridge/savanna<sub/> = 2.7 ± 0.5). This indicates either that the processes that drive or maintain planets in the overdensity are more efficient for Jupiters, or that the processes that drive or maintain planets in the warm region are more efficient for Neptunes.<i>Conclusions<i/>. Our revised landscape supports a previous hypothesis that a fraction of Neptunes were brought to the edge of the desert (i.e. the newly identified ridge) through high-eccentricity tidal migration (HEM) late in their life, surviving the evaporation that eroded Neptunes having arrived earlier in the desert. The ridge thus appears as a true physical feature illustrating the interplay between photoevaporation and HEM, providing further evidence of their role in shaping the distribution of close-in Neptunes.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context. Atmospheric and dynamical processes are thought to play a major role in shaping the distribution of close-in exoplanets. A striking feature of such distribution is the Neptunian desert, a dearth of Neptunes on the shortest-period orbits.Aims. We aimed to define the boundaries of the Neptunian desert and study its transition into the savanna, a moderately populated region at larger orbital distances. Our goal was to acquire new insight into the processes that carved out the Neptunian landscape, and to provide the exoplanet community with a framework for conducting studies on planet formation and evolution.Methods. We built a sample of planets and candidates based on the Kepler DR25 catalogue and weighed it according to the transit and detection probabilities. We then used the corrected distribution to study occurrences across the period and period-radius spaces. Results. We delimited the Neptunian desert as the close-in region of the period-radius space with no planets at a 3σ level, and provide the community with simple, ready-to-use approximate boundaries. We identified an overdensity of planets separating the Neptunian desert from the savanna (3.2 days ⪅ Porb ⪅ 5.7 days) that stands out at a 4.7σ level above the desert and at a 3.5σ level above the savanna, which we propose to call the Neptunian ridge. The period range of the ridge matches that of the well-known hot Jupiter pileup (≃3–5 days), which suggests that similar evolutionary processes might act on both populations. We find that the occurrence fraction between the pileup and warm Jupiters (ƒpileup/warm = 5.3 ± 1.1) is about twice that between the Neptunian ridge and savanna (ƒridge/savanna = 2.7 ± 0.5). This indicates either that the processes that drive or maintain planets in the overdensity are more efficient for Jupiters, or that the processes that drive or maintain planets in the warm region are more efficient for Neptunes.Conclusions. Our revised landscape supports a previous hypothesis that a fraction of Neptunes were brought to the edge of the desert (i.e. the newly identified ridge) through high-eccentricity tidal migration (HEM) late in their life, surviving the evaporation that eroded Neptunes having arrived earlier in the desert. The ridge thus appears as a true physical feature illustrating the interplay between photoevaporation and HEM, providing further evidence of their role in shaping the distribution of close-in Neptunes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制外海王星地貌图
背景。大气和动力学过程被认为在形成近地系外行星的分布中起着重要作用。这种分布的一个显著特点是海王星沙漠,即在最短周期轨道上缺乏海王星。我们的目标是确定海王星沙漠的边界,并研究它向热带草原的过渡,热带草原是一个在较大轨道距离上人口密度适中的区域。我们的目标是对海王星地貌的形成过程获得新的认识,并为系外行星界提供一个研究行星形成和演化的框架。我们根据开普勒DR25目录建立了一个行星和候选行星样本,并根据凌日和探测概率对其进行了权衡。然后,我们利用修正后的分布来研究整个周期和周期-半径空间的出现情况。结果。我们将海王星沙漠划定为周期-半径空间中没有行星的3σ级近邻区域,并为社区提供了简单易用的近似边界。我们发现了海王星沙漠与热带草原(3.2 天 ⪅ Porb ⪅ 5.7 天)之间的行星密度过高,在沙漠上方 4.7σ 和热带草原上方 3.5σ 的水平上比较突出,我们建议称其为海王星脊。海王星脊的周期范围与著名的热木星堆积(≃3-5 天)相吻合,这表明类似的进化过程可能会作用于这两个种群。我们发现,堆积木和暖木星之间的出现率(ƒpileup/warm = 5.3 ± 1.1)大约是海王星脊和热带草原之间的出现率(ƒridge/savanna = 2.7 ± 0.5)的两倍。这表明,驱动或维持行星处于过密度的过程对于木星来说更为有效,或者驱动或维持行星处于温暖区域的过程对于海王星来说更为有效。我们修正后的地貌支持了之前的假设,即一部分海王星是在其生命的晚期通过高同心度潮汐迁移(HEM)被带到沙漠边缘(即新发现的海脊)的,它们在早期到达沙漠的海王星被蒸发侵蚀后幸存了下来。因此,海脊是一个真正的物理特征,说明了光蒸发和高同心度潮汐迁移之间的相互作用,进一步证明了它们在形成近海王星分布中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
期刊最新文献
A multi-wavelength study of Galactic H II regions with extended emission Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape Sulfur monoxide (SO) as a shock tracer in protoplanetary disks: Case of AB Aurigae Discs are born eccentric K2-399 b is not a planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1