Electroconvulsive therapy response and remission in moderate to severe depressive illness: a decade of national Scottish data

David M. Semple, Szabolcs Suveges, J. Douglas Steele
{"title":"Electroconvulsive therapy response and remission in moderate to severe depressive illness: a decade of national Scottish data","authors":"David M. Semple, Szabolcs Suveges, J. Douglas Steele","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Despite strong evidence of efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of depression, no sensitive and specific predictors of ECT response have been identified. Previous meta-analyses have suggested some pre-treatment associations with response at a population level.</p><span>Aims</span><p>Using 10 years (2009–2018) of routinely collected Scottish data of people with moderate to severe depression (<span>n</span> = 2074) receiving ECT we tested two hypotheses: (a) that there were significant group-level associations between post-ECT clinical outcomes and pre-ECT clinical variables and (b) that it was possible to develop a method for predicting illness remission for individual patients using machine learning.</p><span>Method</span><p>Data were analysed on a group level using descriptive statistics and association analyses as well as using individual patient prediction with machine learning methodologies, including cross-validation.</p><span>Results</span><p>ECT is highly effective for moderate to severe depression, with a response rate of 73% and remission rate of 51%. ECT response is associated with older age, psychotic symptoms, necessity for urgent intervention, severe distress, psychomotor retardation, previous good response, lack of medication resistance, and consent status. Remission has the same associations except for necessity for urgent intervention and, in addition, history of recurrent depression and low suicide risk. It is possible to predict remission with ECT with an accuracy of 61%.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Pre-ECT clinical variables are associated with both response and remission and can help predict individual response to ECT. This predictive tool could inform shared decision-making, prevent the unnecessary use of ECT when it is unlikely to be beneficial and ensure prompt use of ECT when it is likely to be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite strong evidence of efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of depression, no sensitive and specific predictors of ECT response have been identified. Previous meta-analyses have suggested some pre-treatment associations with response at a population level.

Aims

Using 10 years (2009–2018) of routinely collected Scottish data of people with moderate to severe depression (n = 2074) receiving ECT we tested two hypotheses: (a) that there were significant group-level associations between post-ECT clinical outcomes and pre-ECT clinical variables and (b) that it was possible to develop a method for predicting illness remission for individual patients using machine learning.

Method

Data were analysed on a group level using descriptive statistics and association analyses as well as using individual patient prediction with machine learning methodologies, including cross-validation.

Results

ECT is highly effective for moderate to severe depression, with a response rate of 73% and remission rate of 51%. ECT response is associated with older age, psychotic symptoms, necessity for urgent intervention, severe distress, psychomotor retardation, previous good response, lack of medication resistance, and consent status. Remission has the same associations except for necessity for urgent intervention and, in addition, history of recurrent depression and low suicide risk. It is possible to predict remission with ECT with an accuracy of 61%.

Conclusions

Pre-ECT clinical variables are associated with both response and remission and can help predict individual response to ECT. This predictive tool could inform shared decision-making, prevent the unnecessary use of ECT when it is unlikely to be beneficial and ensure prompt use of ECT when it is likely to be effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电休克疗法对中度至重度抑郁症的反应和缓解:苏格兰全国十年的数据
背景尽管有确凿证据表明电休克疗法(ECT)在治疗抑郁症方面具有显著疗效,但目前尚未发现敏感而特异的电休克疗法反应预测因素。目的利用苏格兰10年(2009-2018年)常规收集的接受电痉挛疗法治疗的中重度抑郁症患者(n = 2074)的数据,我们测试了两个假设:(a)电痉挛疗法后的临床结果与电痉挛疗法前的临床变量之间存在显著的群体关联;(b)有可能开发出一种使用机器学习预测个体患者病情缓解的方法。结果ECT对中重度抑郁症非常有效,反应率为73%,缓解率为51%。电痉挛疗法的应答与年龄、精神病症状、紧急干预的必要性、严重的痛苦、精神运动迟滞、先前的良好应答、无抗药性和同意状态有关。除了需要紧急干预,缓解与其他因素也有同样的关系,此外,还与反复抑郁史和低自杀风险有关。结论ECT前临床变量与反应和缓解相关,有助于预测个人对ECT的反应。这一预测工具可为共同决策提供信息,防止在电痉挛疗法不太可能产生疗效时不必要地使用该疗法,并确保在电痉挛疗法可能有效时及时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial disparities influence access and outcomes in talking therapies Taming the Chimaera–Hydra: disconnecting from the net to fortify our mental health Artificial intelligence and cybercrime: implications for individuals and the healthcare sector Chronopsychiatry Racism in psychiatry and the case of presentism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1