Interpretability in the modeling spectrum: A conceptual framework and a quantification index

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecological Modelling Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110882
{"title":"Interpretability in the modeling spectrum: A conceptual framework and a quantification index","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper addresses the challenge of enhancing interpretability in the construction of mathematical models, which are essential for understanding and optimizing complex systems. The primary motivation lies in the need to establish a common conceptual framework across the modeling spectrum and to improve the interpretability of mathematical models, particularly in the context of first principles based semi-physical models (FPBSM). The importance of physical interpretation in models, especially within biotechnological or ecological processes, is highlighted, starting from the difficulty in establishing clear boundaries when searching for constitutive equations in such models, while maintaining a balance between fit accuracy and model interpretability. To meet this challenge, we propose a novel conceptual framework for addressing interpretability within the mathematical modeling spectrum and introduce a mathematical index for quantifying interpretability in FPBSM. Furthermore, the existing modeling methodology is extended by integrating interpretability as an additional criterion in determining the level of specification at which the search for constitutive equations should be stopped. The utility of the index and the proposed methodology is evaluated using a growth model of the grapevine moth (<em>Lobesia botrana</em>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of enhancing interpretability in the construction of mathematical models, which are essential for understanding and optimizing complex systems. The primary motivation lies in the need to establish a common conceptual framework across the modeling spectrum and to improve the interpretability of mathematical models, particularly in the context of first principles based semi-physical models (FPBSM). The importance of physical interpretation in models, especially within biotechnological or ecological processes, is highlighted, starting from the difficulty in establishing clear boundaries when searching for constitutive equations in such models, while maintaining a balance between fit accuracy and model interpretability. To meet this challenge, we propose a novel conceptual framework for addressing interpretability within the mathematical modeling spectrum and introduce a mathematical index for quantifying interpretability in FPBSM. Furthermore, the existing modeling methodology is extended by integrating interpretability as an additional criterion in determining the level of specification at which the search for constitutive equations should be stopped. The utility of the index and the proposed methodology is evaluated using a growth model of the grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建模领域的可解释性:概念框架和量化指数
数学模型对于理解和优化复杂系统至关重要,本文探讨了在构建数学模型过程中提高可解释性的挑战。其主要动机在于需要在建模领域建立一个共同的概念框架,并提高数学模型的可解释性,尤其是在基于第一原理的半物理模型(FPBSM)方面。我们强调了模型中物理解释的重要性,特别是生物技术或生态过程中的物理解释,其出发点是在这类模型中寻找组成方程时难以确定清晰的边界,同时又要保持拟合精度和模型可解释性之间的平衡。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一个新的概念框架,用于解决数学建模范围内的可解释性问题,并引入了一个数学指标,用于量化 FPBSM 中的可解释性。此外,我们还扩展了现有的建模方法,将可解释性作为一个附加标准,用于确定应停止寻找构造方程的规范水平。利用葡萄蠹蛾(Lobesia botrana)的生长模型,对该指数和建议方法的实用性进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Uncertainty analysis of hydrological parameters of the APEXgraze model for grazing activities prior3D: An R package for three-dimensional conservation prioritization Effects of temperature on asexual reproduction and jellyfish booms of Aurelia aurita: Insights from mathematical modeling Interactive effects of climate change and human mobility on dengue transmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1