The sum of the parts: Green, gray, and green-gray infrastructure to mitigate wave overtopping

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104615
Margaret Libby , Tori Tomiczek , Daniel Cox , Pedro Lomónaco
{"title":"The sum of the parts: Green, gray, and green-gray infrastructure to mitigate wave overtopping","authors":"Margaret Libby ,&nbsp;Tori Tomiczek ,&nbsp;Daniel Cox ,&nbsp;Pedro Lomónaco","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hybrid approaches to shoreline protection, where natural (“green”) features are combined with hardened (“gray”) infrastructure, are increasingly used to protect coastlines from erosion and flood-based hazards. Our understanding of hybrid systems is limited, and it is unknown whether the components of these systems interact in any meaningful sense to provide flood reduction benefits that are greater or less than “the sum of the parts.” In this study, a large-scale physical model was used to investigate the overtopping of a vertical wall protected by a hybrid system where an idealized <em>Rhizophora</em> mangrove forest of moderate cross-shore width fronted a rubble-mound revetment. Configurations included the wall alone, the wall with a low- or intermediate-density mangrove forest without the revetment, the wall with the revetment, and the wall with an intermediate- or high-density mangrove forest and the revetment. The study isolated the reduction in overtopping of the wall by the revetment component, the mangrove forest component, and the interaction between the components of the hybrid system. The total reduction by the hybrid system was estimated within 5% accuracy as the sum of the reduction by each component minus the product of the component reductions. Comparison of the proportional reduction in overtopping by the mangrove forest on the wall alone and the wall with the revetment indicated that the mangrove forest reduced the overtopping of the revetment by approximately the same proportion that the forest reduced the overtopping of the wall. Therefore, (1) total overtopping reduction by the hybrid system was modeled as the reduction expected from the green and gray components in series. Additional analysis showed that (2) for the same wave conditions, a mangrove forest of moderate cross-shore width can have equal or greater protective benefits than a coastal revetment, (3) there is an exponential relationship between the discharge rate and the forest density, and (4) the mangrove forest, the revetment, and the hybrid system all provided greater reduction in overtopping as wave steepness increased. The tests in this study were conducted without wave breaking, with constant freeboard and water depth, with a specific revetment geometry, and without a mangrove canopy. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution if used for engineering design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 104615"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid approaches to shoreline protection, where natural (“green”) features are combined with hardened (“gray”) infrastructure, are increasingly used to protect coastlines from erosion and flood-based hazards. Our understanding of hybrid systems is limited, and it is unknown whether the components of these systems interact in any meaningful sense to provide flood reduction benefits that are greater or less than “the sum of the parts.” In this study, a large-scale physical model was used to investigate the overtopping of a vertical wall protected by a hybrid system where an idealized Rhizophora mangrove forest of moderate cross-shore width fronted a rubble-mound revetment. Configurations included the wall alone, the wall with a low- or intermediate-density mangrove forest without the revetment, the wall with the revetment, and the wall with an intermediate- or high-density mangrove forest and the revetment. The study isolated the reduction in overtopping of the wall by the revetment component, the mangrove forest component, and the interaction between the components of the hybrid system. The total reduction by the hybrid system was estimated within 5% accuracy as the sum of the reduction by each component minus the product of the component reductions. Comparison of the proportional reduction in overtopping by the mangrove forest on the wall alone and the wall with the revetment indicated that the mangrove forest reduced the overtopping of the revetment by approximately the same proportion that the forest reduced the overtopping of the wall. Therefore, (1) total overtopping reduction by the hybrid system was modeled as the reduction expected from the green and gray components in series. Additional analysis showed that (2) for the same wave conditions, a mangrove forest of moderate cross-shore width can have equal or greater protective benefits than a coastal revetment, (3) there is an exponential relationship between the discharge rate and the forest density, and (4) the mangrove forest, the revetment, and the hybrid system all provided greater reduction in overtopping as wave steepness increased. The tests in this study were conducted without wave breaking, with constant freeboard and water depth, with a specific revetment geometry, and without a mangrove canopy. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution if used for engineering design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各部分的总和:绿色、灰色和绿灰色基础设施,以减轻波浪倾覆
海岸线保护的混合方法,即自然("绿色")特征与硬化("灰色")基础设施相结合,越来越多地用于保护海岸线免受侵蚀和洪水灾害。我们对混合系统的了解还很有限,也不知道这些系统的各组成部分是否在任何意义上相互作用,以提供大于或小于 "各部分之和 "的减洪效益。在这项研究中,我们使用了一个大型物理模型来研究由混合系统保护的垂直墙的倾覆问题,在这个混合系统中,理想化的红树林具有适度的跨岸宽度,其前面是一个碎石堆护岸。配置包括单独的墙体、带有低密度或中密度红树林但不带护岸的墙体、带有护岸的墙体以及带有中密度或高密度红树林和护岸的墙体。该研究将护岸部分、红树林部分以及混合系统各部分之间的相互作用隔离开来,以减少围墙的倾覆。混合系统减少的倾覆总量的估算精确度在 5%以内,即各部分减少的倾覆总量之和减去各部分减少的倾覆总量的乘积。比较红树林对单独围墙和围墙与护岸的倾覆减少比例表明,红树林对护岸倾覆的减少比例与红树林对围墙倾覆的减少比例大致相同。因此,(1) 混合系统减少的总倾覆量被模拟为绿色和灰色部分串联预期减少的倾覆量。其他分析表明:(2) 在相同的波浪条件下,中等跨岸宽度的红树林比海岸护岸具有相同或更大的保护效益;(3) 排水量与森林密度之间存在指数关系;(4) 随着波浪陡度的增加,红树林、护岸和混合系统都能更大程度地减少倾覆。本研究中的测试是在没有破浪、自由板和水深不变、特定护岸几何形状以及没有红树林冠层的情况下进行的。因此,如果将这些结果用于工程设计,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of linear and nonlinear 3D semi-Lagrangian motion of moored Waverider and Spotter wave buoys Experimental study on tsunami-driven debris damming loads on columns of an elevated coastal structure A probabilistic coral rubble mechanical instability model applied with field observations from the Great Barrier reef Numerical modelling of pump-driven tsunami generation and fluid-structure-interaction in idealized urbanized coastal areas during run-up Energy balance during Bragg wave resonance by submerged porous breakwaters through a mixture theory-based δ-LES-SPH model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1