Spatially explicit priority optimization of land ecosystem services in the ecologically fragile region

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107356
Yu Liu , Zhengjia Liu , Xun Zhang , Bin Zhang , Jinlian Shi , Aijun Liu , Shujuan Chang , Yong Yang , Yu Wang
{"title":"Spatially explicit priority optimization of land ecosystem services in the ecologically fragile region","authors":"Yu Liu ,&nbsp;Zhengjia Liu ,&nbsp;Xun Zhang ,&nbsp;Bin Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinlian Shi ,&nbsp;Aijun Liu ,&nbsp;Shujuan Chang ,&nbsp;Yong Yang ,&nbsp;Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spatially explicit priority optimization based on the tradeoffs and synergies between multiple ecosystem services (ESs) is greatly responsible for improving sustainable land use management and human well-being in ecologically fragile regions (EFRs). Here, Inner Mongolia, a typical EFR in China, was taken as the study area. Its five prominent ESs, i.e., soil retention (SR), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), and windbreak and sand-fixing (WS), were firstly evaluated. The local bivariate Moran's I and the sensitivity analysis were adopted to identify the spatial relationships between them, and the key social-ecological variables affecting ESs, respectively. To simulate the spatially explicit priority optimization areas, four scenarios were designed using the Bayesian belief network. Results showed the five ESs had heterogeneous spatial distributions and temporal dynamics. Variations in relationships between paired ESs were found across space and time. Regional factors, including both natural and human influence, influenced the ESs. The spatially explicit priority optimization areas for forest and grassland were showed in different areas by the scenario analysis. Besides, diverse sustainable land use policies from the perspectives of protection, planning, and management were also suggested. These findings could provide valuable references for EFR sustainable development worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107356"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724003090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatially explicit priority optimization based on the tradeoffs and synergies between multiple ecosystem services (ESs) is greatly responsible for improving sustainable land use management and human well-being in ecologically fragile regions (EFRs). Here, Inner Mongolia, a typical EFR in China, was taken as the study area. Its five prominent ESs, i.e., soil retention (SR), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), water yield (WY), and windbreak and sand-fixing (WS), were firstly evaluated. The local bivariate Moran's I and the sensitivity analysis were adopted to identify the spatial relationships between them, and the key social-ecological variables affecting ESs, respectively. To simulate the spatially explicit priority optimization areas, four scenarios were designed using the Bayesian belief network. Results showed the five ESs had heterogeneous spatial distributions and temporal dynamics. Variations in relationships between paired ESs were found across space and time. Regional factors, including both natural and human influence, influenced the ESs. The spatially explicit priority optimization areas for forest and grassland were showed in different areas by the scenario analysis. Besides, diverse sustainable land use policies from the perspectives of protection, planning, and management were also suggested. These findings could provide valuable references for EFR sustainable development worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态脆弱地区土地生态系统服务的空间明确优先优化
基于多种生态系统服务(ES)之间的权衡和协同作用而进行的空间明确优先级优化,对于改善生态脆弱地区(EFR)的可持续土地利用管理和人类福祉具有重要意义。本文以中国典型的生态脆弱区--内蒙古为研究区域。首先评估了该地区的五个主要生态系统,即土壤保持(SR)、碳储存(CS)、栖息地质量(HQ)、产水量(WY)和防风固沙(WS)。采用局部双变量 Moran's I 和敏感性分析,分别确定了它们之间的空间关系,以及影响 ES 的关键社会生态变量。为了模拟空间明确的优先优化区域,利用贝叶斯信念网络设计了四种情景。结果表明,五种生态系统具有不同的空间分布和时间动态。成对的生态系统之间的关系在空间和时间上存在差异。包括自然和人为影响在内的区域因素对 ESs 产生了影响。通过情景分析,不同地区的森林和草地在空间上呈现出明确的优先优化区域。此外,还从保护、规划和管理的角度提出了多样化的可持续土地利用政策建议。这些研究结果可为世界范围内的 EFR 可持续发展提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
The engagement of environmental organizations on land policies: A case study of Pro Natura, Switzerland Multi-scenario simulation of low-carbon land use based on the SD-FLUS model in Changsha, China The smart city competitiveness index (SMCI): Conceptualization, modelling, application – An evidence-based insight Can urban low-carbon transformation affect the prices of its industrial land? An empirical study based on spatial regression discontinuity Quantifying supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services from a dynamic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1