What influences different stakeholders' willingness to accept and pay for reusable tableware? Evidence from a CVM survey of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao GBA

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107671
{"title":"What influences different stakeholders' willingness to accept and pay for reusable tableware? Evidence from a CVM survey of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao GBA","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Takeaway packaging waste seriously pollutes the ecological environment. Better identification of stakeholders' willingness to accept reusable tableware is important for addressing the growing takeaway waste packaging challenges. However, prior literature has not specifically addressed the influencing factors that affect different stakeholders' willingness toward reusable tableware. To this end, this study is designed to explore the key influencing factors and differences in residents', takeaway clerks' and enterprises' willingness to accept (WTA) and pay (WTP) for reusable tableware in Macao, Guangzhou and Zhuhai cities, based on a CVM survey. The results show that, for residents, the WTA of respondents in Macao, Guangzhou and Zhuhai were 56.73 %, 70.60 % and 64.42 % respectively, while their WTP were 73.45 %, 91.11 % and 82.86 % respectively, and their unit WTP values were 3.08 MOP ($0.38), 2.03 CNY ($0.28) and 1.89 CNY ($0.26) respectively. In addition, for takeaway clerks and enterprises, more than half (nearly 60 %) of the respondents were willing to accept the promotion of reusable tableware. Hygiene issues, convenience and cost were the key reasons for respondents' rejecting reusable tableware. Overall, personal attitude and demographic information were the important factors for all three stakeholders' WTA and for residents' WTP, showing that improving different stakeholders' willingness toward RT is the key to building a reusable takeaway packaging system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Takeaway packaging waste seriously pollutes the ecological environment. Better identification of stakeholders' willingness to accept reusable tableware is important for addressing the growing takeaway waste packaging challenges. However, prior literature has not specifically addressed the influencing factors that affect different stakeholders' willingness toward reusable tableware. To this end, this study is designed to explore the key influencing factors and differences in residents', takeaway clerks' and enterprises' willingness to accept (WTA) and pay (WTP) for reusable tableware in Macao, Guangzhou and Zhuhai cities, based on a CVM survey. The results show that, for residents, the WTA of respondents in Macao, Guangzhou and Zhuhai were 56.73 %, 70.60 % and 64.42 % respectively, while their WTP were 73.45 %, 91.11 % and 82.86 % respectively, and their unit WTP values were 3.08 MOP ($0.38), 2.03 CNY ($0.28) and 1.89 CNY ($0.26) respectively. In addition, for takeaway clerks and enterprises, more than half (nearly 60 %) of the respondents were willing to accept the promotion of reusable tableware. Hygiene issues, convenience and cost were the key reasons for respondents' rejecting reusable tableware. Overall, personal attitude and demographic information were the important factors for all three stakeholders' WTA and for residents' WTP, showing that improving different stakeholders' willingness toward RT is the key to building a reusable takeaway packaging system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么影响了不同利益相关者对可重复使用餐具的接受和支付意愿?来自粤港澳大湾区CVM调查的证据
外卖包装垃圾严重污染生态环境。更好地识别利益相关者接受可重复使用餐具的意愿,对于应对日益严峻的外卖包装垃圾挑战非常重要。然而,以往的文献并未具体探讨影响不同利益相关者对可重复使用餐具意愿的影响因素。为此,本研究以 CVM 调查为基础,探讨澳门、广州和珠海三地居民、外卖店员和企业对可重复使用餐具的接受意愿(WTA)和支付意愿(WTP)的主要影响因素和差异。结果显示,对于居民而言,澳门、广州和珠海受访者的WTA分别为56.73%、70.60%和64.42%,WTP分别为73.45%、91.11%和82.86%,单位WTP值分别为3.08澳门元(0.38美元)、2.03元人民币(0.28美元)和1.89元人民币(0.26美元)。此外,对于外卖店员和外卖企业,超过半数(近 60%)的受访者愿意接受推广可重复使用餐具。卫生问题、方便性和成本是受访者拒绝可重复使用餐具的主要原因。总体而言,个人态度和人口统计信息是影响三个利益相关方 WTA 和居民 WTP 的重要因素,这表明改善不同利益相关方对 RT 的意愿是建立可重复使用外卖包装系统的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Solastalgia and public environment-friendly behaviors in the urbanization context Environmental assessment of cenosphere and GGBFS-based geopolymers: A path to greener construction materials Interactive and dynamic insights into environmental impacts of a neighborhood: A tight coupling of multi-agent system and dynamic life cycle assessment Multilevel analysis of land reallocation and carbon emissions through food trade Structural evolution of CO2 emissions outsourcing within the global ICT multinational investment network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1