Technological advances have enhanced and expanded conservation genomics research but are yet to be integrated fully into biodiversity management

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110788
{"title":"Technological advances have enhanced and expanded conservation genomics research but are yet to be integrated fully into biodiversity management","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservation genetics and genomics examines the role of evolutionary and genetic processes in the persistence of organisms, and its research is intended to inform biodiversity management. To characterize the fields within the discipline and map their trends over time and across the globe, we used text analysis to synthesize the peer-reviewed literature (<em>n</em> = 36,159). We then searched for reference to this literature in government documents to determine the frequency with which research was referenced. We found dramatic shifts in research topics associated with the advent of next generation sequencing, including the emergence of environmental DNA analyses. However, we also found a lag in the uptake of these methods, leaving markers such as microsatellites still widely used. Most research was undertaken in higher-income countries, while research involving lower-income countries was typically conducted though collaboration with higher-income countries. Although the number of peer-reviewed publications in the field has increased rapidly, the number referenced in biodiversity management documents has not, instead plateauing at ~10 % of publications since 2010. This suggests a growing disconnect between genomic research and its application. Similar topics attracted both academic citations and mentions in “on-the-ground” documentation, although some of the topics with increasing prevalence in research, such as genomic technologies, appeared less frequently in practice. Promoting co-design and long-term collaboration, rather than post hoc translation of research to application, could provide a more direct pathway for integration between research and governments by ensuring that the research is embraced by, and relevant to, stakeholders and on the ground conservation actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724003501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation genetics and genomics examines the role of evolutionary and genetic processes in the persistence of organisms, and its research is intended to inform biodiversity management. To characterize the fields within the discipline and map their trends over time and across the globe, we used text analysis to synthesize the peer-reviewed literature (n = 36,159). We then searched for reference to this literature in government documents to determine the frequency with which research was referenced. We found dramatic shifts in research topics associated with the advent of next generation sequencing, including the emergence of environmental DNA analyses. However, we also found a lag in the uptake of these methods, leaving markers such as microsatellites still widely used. Most research was undertaken in higher-income countries, while research involving lower-income countries was typically conducted though collaboration with higher-income countries. Although the number of peer-reviewed publications in the field has increased rapidly, the number referenced in biodiversity management documents has not, instead plateauing at ~10 % of publications since 2010. This suggests a growing disconnect between genomic research and its application. Similar topics attracted both academic citations and mentions in “on-the-ground” documentation, although some of the topics with increasing prevalence in research, such as genomic technologies, appeared less frequently in practice. Promoting co-design and long-term collaboration, rather than post hoc translation of research to application, could provide a more direct pathway for integration between research and governments by ensuring that the research is embraced by, and relevant to, stakeholders and on the ground conservation actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Conservation threats from tourism land grabs and greenwash Technological advances have enhanced and expanded conservation genomics research but are yet to be integrated fully into biodiversity management Wildlife restoration in fragmented landscapes: Trialling wild-to-wild translocation with two common reptiles A systematic review of the land use change effects on ant diversity in Neotropics Avian community responses to energy development and woody encroachment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1