Making memories: The gestural misinformation effect in children aged 11-16-years-old with intellectual/developmental difficulties.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104828
{"title":"Making memories: The gestural misinformation effect in children aged 11-16-years-old with intellectual/developmental difficulties.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2016, global records documented around 1 billion child abuse cases, with higher rates among children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD), and most recorded offenses not proceeding to court. Accurate eyewitness testimony is vital for the justice system. Yet, while children with IDD are known to be influenced by verbal misinformation, the effect of gestures on their testimony is still unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The present study assessed the extent to which gesture can mislead children with IDD, alongside comparisons to prior research in typically developing (TD) children.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A sample of children with moderate IDD aged 11–16 years (n = 21, <em>M</em>=12.95 years) were recruited from a UK school, and compared to TD 5–6-year-olds (n = 31, <em>M</em>=5.77 years) and 7–8-year-olds (<em>n</em> = 32, <em>M</em>=7.66 years) from previous published research. After watching a video participants underwent an interview containing 12 questions, some of which contained suggestive gestures.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and Implications</h3><p>Results demonstrated that in children with IDD, gesture observation significantly influenced responses given, with 18 of 21 children being misled at least once. Comparisons to TD children indicated no difference in suggestibility. This study is the first to examine how leading gestural information affects children with IDD, broadening previous research to a more representative sample for the justice system. Discussion centres on implications for police interview guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001604/pdfft?md5=eef4fabf3030855df5cb47877244b0d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224001604-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In 2016, global records documented around 1 billion child abuse cases, with higher rates among children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD), and most recorded offenses not proceeding to court. Accurate eyewitness testimony is vital for the justice system. Yet, while children with IDD are known to be influenced by verbal misinformation, the effect of gestures on their testimony is still unknown.

Aims

The present study assessed the extent to which gesture can mislead children with IDD, alongside comparisons to prior research in typically developing (TD) children.

Method

A sample of children with moderate IDD aged 11–16 years (n = 21, M=12.95 years) were recruited from a UK school, and compared to TD 5–6-year-olds (n = 31, M=5.77 years) and 7–8-year-olds (n = 32, M=7.66 years) from previous published research. After watching a video participants underwent an interview containing 12 questions, some of which contained suggestive gestures.

Outcomes and Implications

Results demonstrated that in children with IDD, gesture observation significantly influenced responses given, with 18 of 21 children being misled at least once. Comparisons to TD children indicated no difference in suggestibility. This study is the first to examine how leading gestural information affects children with IDD, broadening previous research to a more representative sample for the justice system. Discussion centres on implications for police interview guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制造记忆:11-16 岁智力/发育障碍儿童的手势错误信息效应。
背景2016年,全球记录在案的虐待儿童案件约有10亿起,其中智力和发育障碍(IDD)儿童受虐率更高,且大多数记录在案的犯罪行为都未进入法庭审理程序。准确的目击证人证词对司法系统至关重要。本研究评估了手势在多大程度上会误导智障儿童,并将其与之前对典型发育(TD)儿童的研究进行了比较。方法从英国一所学校招募了 11-16 岁的中度 IDD 儿童样本(n=21,M=12.95 岁),并与之前发表的研究中 5-6 岁的 TD 儿童(n=31,M=5.77 岁)和 7-8 岁的 TD 儿童(n=32,M=7.66 岁)进行了比较。在观看视频后,参与者接受了包含 12 个问题的访谈,其中一些问题包含暗示性手势。结果和意义结果表明,对 IDD 儿童而言,手势观察会显著影响他们的回答,21 名儿童中有 18 名至少被误导过一次。与智障儿童相比,他们在受暗示性方面没有差异。这项研究首次考察了引导性手势信息对智障儿童的影响,将以往的研究扩展到了司法系统中更具代表性的样本。讨论的重点是对警方面谈指南的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Making memories: The gestural misinformation effect in children aged 11-16-years-old with intellectual/developmental difficulties. EEG activation in preschool children: Characteristics and predictive value for current and future mental health status Editorial Board The effect of dual-task training on postural and cognitive performances in adolescents with down syndrome Editorial: Advancing understanding and care for individuals with developmental disabilities in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1