It’s time to speak up! investor reaction to CEO sociopolitical activism

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114966
Michael A. Abebe , Keshab Acharya , Mark J. Kroll
{"title":"It’s time to speak up! investor reaction to CEO sociopolitical activism","authors":"Michael A. Abebe ,&nbsp;Keshab Acharya ,&nbsp;Mark J. Kroll","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we explore how investors react to incidents of CEO sociopolitical activism. Drawing from the business case logic and political psychology literature, we theorize that the perceived relevance and ideology of CEO comments, as well as the institutional context in which they were made determine investor reactions. Our analysis of 379 CEO comments made between 2007–2020 indicates that investors react positively to CEOs’ political comments and negatively to sociocultural ones. Specifically, political comments are received favorably by investors if they are conservative-leaning, and this is especially true when made by CEOs of firms with greater government dependence or those operating in highly regulated industries. Conversely, investors react negatively to social comments made by CEOs of highly regulated firms. Overall, this study addresses recent calls for research on the expanding role of executives by highlighting the complex reactions CEO sociopolitical activism engenders among capital market stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114966"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we explore how investors react to incidents of CEO sociopolitical activism. Drawing from the business case logic and political psychology literature, we theorize that the perceived relevance and ideology of CEO comments, as well as the institutional context in which they were made determine investor reactions. Our analysis of 379 CEO comments made between 2007–2020 indicates that investors react positively to CEOs’ political comments and negatively to sociocultural ones. Specifically, political comments are received favorably by investors if they are conservative-leaning, and this is especially true when made by CEOs of firms with greater government dependence or those operating in highly regulated industries. Conversely, investors react negatively to social comments made by CEOs of highly regulated firms. Overall, this study addresses recent calls for research on the expanding role of executives by highlighting the complex reactions CEO sociopolitical activism engenders among capital market stakeholders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是时候大声说出来了!投资者对首席执行官社会政治行动主义的反应
在本研究中,我们探讨了投资者对首席执行官社会政治激进主义事件的反应。借鉴商业案例逻辑和政治心理学文献,我们从理论上认为,CEO 评论的相关性和意识形态以及发表评论的制度背景决定了投资者的反应。我们对 2007-2020 年间发表的 379 篇 CEO 评论进行的分析表明,投资者对 CEO 的政治评论反应积极,而对社会文化评论反应消极。具体来说,政治评论如果偏向保守,就会受到投资者的青睐,尤其是对政府依赖程度较高或在高度管制行业经营的公司的首席执行官所发表的评论。相反,投资者对高度管制企业首席执行官的社会评论反应消极。总之,本研究通过强调首席执行官的社会政治行动主义在资本市场利益相关者中引起的复杂反应,回应了近期对高管角色不断扩大的研究呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Reinstating the radical: Trajectory, debates, and proposals for strategy as practice The past, present, and future of sustainability marketing: How did we get here and where might we go? Don’t make me hate you, my love! Perceived brand betrayal and the love-becomes-hate phenomenon Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1