A retrospective, single-center 4-year review of synthetic polyurethane matrix use in burns and other complex wounds

Muntazim Mukit , Payton Grande , David Hill , Kalyan Dadireddy , Sai Velamuri , Mahmoud Hassouba , Xiangxia Liu
{"title":"A retrospective, single-center 4-year review of synthetic polyurethane matrix use in burns and other complex wounds","authors":"Muntazim Mukit ,&nbsp;Payton Grande ,&nbsp;David Hill ,&nbsp;Kalyan Dadireddy ,&nbsp;Sai Velamuri ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Hassouba ,&nbsp;Xiangxia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2024.100372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Here we describe the use of a synthetic polyurethane matrix in the setting of burns and other complex wounds in the largest United States case series to date. A retrospective review was conducted at a verified, regional burn center. All patients greater than 18 years of age who received this matrix between January 2019 and July 2023 were included. A total of 182 patients with 250 wounds were included in this study. Thirty-seven percent were smokers, 23.6 % had diabetes and 5.5 % had peripheral vascular disease. The majority were acute burn wounds (60 %), followed by trauma (24.4 %), chronic wounds (5.6 %), infection (4 %) and donor sites (2 %). Exposed structures included fat (54 %), muscle (30 %), bone (16 %) and tendon (14.4 %). Microbial colonization was present in 143 (57.2 %) of cases: 98 (39.2 %) pre-application and 89 (35.6 %) post application. The incidence of new microbial colonisation post-application was 25.6 %. Infection was present in 117 (46.8 %) cases, 49 (19.6 %) pre-matrix application, 44 (17.6 %) post-matrix application and 24 (9.6 %) pre and post application. Eighteen patients (10 %) died. Median length of stay was 27 days. Median time to matrix implantation was 10 days. Median time from matrix placement to skin grafting was 35 days. Where documented, there were 162 wounds (83.5 %) with &gt; 95 % matrix survival and 136 wounds (82.4 %) with &gt; 95 % skin graft survival even in the setting of adverse factors such as infection, diabetes, or nicotine use. This study demonstrates the robustness of this skin substitute to achieve successful reconstruction even in the setting of adverse patient or wound characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 100372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000609/pdfft?md5=a0b243ce19c42b730541bc4c712aaba9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912224000609-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912224000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here we describe the use of a synthetic polyurethane matrix in the setting of burns and other complex wounds in the largest United States case series to date. A retrospective review was conducted at a verified, regional burn center. All patients greater than 18 years of age who received this matrix between January 2019 and July 2023 were included. A total of 182 patients with 250 wounds were included in this study. Thirty-seven percent were smokers, 23.6 % had diabetes and 5.5 % had peripheral vascular disease. The majority were acute burn wounds (60 %), followed by trauma (24.4 %), chronic wounds (5.6 %), infection (4 %) and donor sites (2 %). Exposed structures included fat (54 %), muscle (30 %), bone (16 %) and tendon (14.4 %). Microbial colonization was present in 143 (57.2 %) of cases: 98 (39.2 %) pre-application and 89 (35.6 %) post application. The incidence of new microbial colonisation post-application was 25.6 %. Infection was present in 117 (46.8 %) cases, 49 (19.6 %) pre-matrix application, 44 (17.6 %) post-matrix application and 24 (9.6 %) pre and post application. Eighteen patients (10 %) died. Median length of stay was 27 days. Median time to matrix implantation was 10 days. Median time from matrix placement to skin grafting was 35 days. Where documented, there were 162 wounds (83.5 %) with > 95 % matrix survival and 136 wounds (82.4 %) with > 95 % skin graft survival even in the setting of adverse factors such as infection, diabetes, or nicotine use. This study demonstrates the robustness of this skin substitute to achieve successful reconstruction even in the setting of adverse patient or wound characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对烧伤和其他复杂伤口中使用合成聚氨酯基质的四年回顾性单中心研究
在这里,我们描述了迄今为止美国最大的烧伤和其他复杂伤口病例系列中合成聚氨酯基质的使用情况。我们在一家经过验证的地区烧伤中心进行了回顾性研究。所有在 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间接受过这种基质治疗的 18 岁以上患者都被纳入其中。本研究共纳入了 182 名 250 处伤口的患者。37%的患者为吸烟者,23.6%患有糖尿病,5.5%患有外周血管疾病。大部分是急性烧伤(60%),其次是创伤(24.4%)、慢性伤口(5.6%)、感染(4%)和供体部位(2%)。暴露的结构包括脂肪(54%)、肌肉(30%)、骨骼(16%)和肌腱(14.4%)。143个病例(57.2%)存在微生物定植:98例(39.2%)在使用前,89例(35.6%)在使用后。使用后新微生物定植的发生率为 25.6%。117例(46.8%)病例出现感染,其中49例(19.6%)在使用基质前,44例(17.6%)在使用基质后,24例(9.6%)在使用前和使用后。18名患者(10%)死亡。住院时间中位数为 27 天。基质植入的中位时间为 10 天。从基质植入到植皮的中位时间为 35 天。即使在感染、糖尿病或使用尼古丁等不利因素的情况下,也有162个伤口(83.5%)的基质存活率达到95%,136个伤口(82.4%)的植皮存活率达到95%。这项研究证明了这种皮肤替代品的稳健性,即使在患者或伤口存在不利因素的情况下,也能成功实现重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Successful recovery of 85% TBSA burns in a resource-limited Nigerian hospital without a burns ward or intensive care unit: A case report Third-degree nasal tip burn in a preterm infant treated with amniotic membrane (Case report) A novel non-invasive treatment in deep burned patients who do not have consent to surgery How can mathematics be used to improve burn care? Benefits of the use of porcine skin for the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis injuries: Review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1