A mass evacuation modeling framework to account for vulnerabilities in staged evacuation

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104245
MD Jahedul Alam , Muhammad Ahsanul Habib
{"title":"A mass evacuation modeling framework to account for vulnerabilities in staged evacuation","authors":"MD Jahedul Alam ,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahsanul Habib","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study develops a framework for mass evacuation modeling that considers staged evacuation in response to an impending hurricane for testing and evaluation. The study follows two-stage modeling processes: (1) developing a fuzzy logic-based staged evacuation model that informs staged evacuation scenario building process, and (2) developing a traffic microsimulation model to test and evaluate staged evacuation scenarios. The staged evacuation model ascertains a vulnerability-based zonal prioritization while accounting for geophysical, social, and mobility challenges utilizing the vulnerability-index. Simulation results suggest that average travel time in staged evacuation decreases by 39.5% compared to evacuation without any countermeasure applied. The staged evacuation process demonstrates a decrease of 0.3–4.8 h in clearance time for most zones. The application of vulnerability-index for prioritization enables an efficient evacuation of high-risk areas. For example, Downtown-district is prioritized due to high vulnerability-index yielding a 2.8-hour decrease in clearance time for 50% of downtown-zones. The results will help emergency professionals understand the necessity of incorporating priority needs of vulnerable populations into staged evacuation implementation, testing, and evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 104245"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study develops a framework for mass evacuation modeling that considers staged evacuation in response to an impending hurricane for testing and evaluation. The study follows two-stage modeling processes: (1) developing a fuzzy logic-based staged evacuation model that informs staged evacuation scenario building process, and (2) developing a traffic microsimulation model to test and evaluate staged evacuation scenarios. The staged evacuation model ascertains a vulnerability-based zonal prioritization while accounting for geophysical, social, and mobility challenges utilizing the vulnerability-index. Simulation results suggest that average travel time in staged evacuation decreases by 39.5% compared to evacuation without any countermeasure applied. The staged evacuation process demonstrates a decrease of 0.3–4.8 h in clearance time for most zones. The application of vulnerability-index for prioritization enables an efficient evacuation of high-risk areas. For example, Downtown-district is prioritized due to high vulnerability-index yielding a 2.8-hour decrease in clearance time for 50% of downtown-zones. The results will help emergency professionals understand the necessity of incorporating priority needs of vulnerable populations into staged evacuation implementation, testing, and evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到分阶段疏散脆弱性的大规模疏散建模框架
本研究开发了一个大规模疏散建模框架,考虑了应对即将到来的飓风的分阶段疏散,以进行测试和评估。该研究遵循两个阶段的建模过程:(1)开发基于模糊逻辑的分阶段疏散模型,为分阶段疏散方案的构建过程提供信息;(2)开发交通微观模拟模型,以测试和评估分阶段疏散方案。分阶段疏散模型确定了以脆弱性为基础的分区优先次序,同时利用脆弱性指数考虑了地球物理、社会和流动性方面的挑战。模拟结果表明,与未采取任何应对措施的疏散相比,分阶段疏散的平均旅行时间减少了 39.5%。在大多数区域,分阶段疏散过程可减少 0.3-4.8 小时的疏散时间。采用脆弱性指数进行优先排序,可有效疏散高风险区域。例如,市中心区由于脆弱性指数较高而被优先考虑,从而使 50%的市中心区的疏散时间减少了 2.8 小时。这些结果将帮助应急专业人员了解,在分阶段疏散的实施、测试和评估过程中,将弱势群体的优先需求纳入其中的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Investigating relationships between ridesourcing and public transit using big data analysis and nonlinear machine learning: A case study of Shanghai, China Commuter choice of UAM-friendly neighborhoods Revealing accessibility disparities: A latent class analysis linking objective and subjective accessibility measures The effect of electric vehicle use on trip frequency and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) in the Netherlands Causal inference for transport research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1