“But I wanted to talk about it”: Technology-assisted child sexual abuse victims’ reasoning for delayed disclosure

Malin Joleby , Sara Landström , Carolina Lunde , Linda S. Jonsson
{"title":"“But I wanted to talk about it”: Technology-assisted child sexual abuse victims’ reasoning for delayed disclosure","authors":"Malin Joleby ,&nbsp;Sara Landström ,&nbsp;Carolina Lunde ,&nbsp;Linda S. Jonsson","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Victim disclosure is crucial in uncovering and preventing child sexual abuse, but many victims are reluctant to disclose. While research on child sexual abuse has identified a range of barriers and facilitators for disclosure, the disclosure process for technology-assisted child sexual abuse (TA-CSA) is largely unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Gain a first-person perspective on TA-CSA disclosure.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Seven young women (aged 7–13 at onset of abuse, 17–24 at interview) were interviewed about the barriers to disclosure they had faced and potential facilitating factors that would have helped them disclose earlier.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The interviews were analyzed using data-driven reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>A wish to tell</em> captures the desire to have had someone to share abusive experiences with. <em>Fearing who would find out</em> encapsulates the fear that disclosing to one person will spread beyond the initial disclosure. <em>A need for a cue</em> reflects the participants' lack of knowledge and the need for invitations to talk about sex and abuse. <em>Fearing it was my fault</em> conveys the participants' sense of guilt and their wish to understand that they were not to blame.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a wish to disclose, shame, guilt, and fear were barriers that held them back. Knowledge about TA-CSA, and invitations to the topic were seen as potential facilitators. Four suggested facilitating factors for disclosure, which society and the adult world should prioritize, were synthesized from the interviews: open dialogue on sensitive topics, providing an opportunity to tell, allowing the child to be in control of the story, and lifting the shame and self-blame.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000627/pdfft?md5=f1559057e4212ba7db1211963fd78502&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000627-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Victim disclosure is crucial in uncovering and preventing child sexual abuse, but many victims are reluctant to disclose. While research on child sexual abuse has identified a range of barriers and facilitators for disclosure, the disclosure process for technology-assisted child sexual abuse (TA-CSA) is largely unexplored.

Objective

Gain a first-person perspective on TA-CSA disclosure.

Participants and setting

Seven young women (aged 7–13 at onset of abuse, 17–24 at interview) were interviewed about the barriers to disclosure they had faced and potential facilitating factors that would have helped them disclose earlier.

Methods

The interviews were analyzed using data-driven reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

A wish to tell captures the desire to have had someone to share abusive experiences with. Fearing who would find out encapsulates the fear that disclosing to one person will spread beyond the initial disclosure. A need for a cue reflects the participants' lack of knowledge and the need for invitations to talk about sex and abuse. Fearing it was my fault conveys the participants' sense of guilt and their wish to understand that they were not to blame.

Conclusions

Despite a wish to disclose, shame, guilt, and fear were barriers that held them back. Knowledge about TA-CSA, and invitations to the topic were seen as potential facilitators. Four suggested facilitating factors for disclosure, which society and the adult world should prioritize, were synthesized from the interviews: open dialogue on sensitive topics, providing an opportunity to tell, allowing the child to be in control of the story, and lifting the shame and self-blame.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"但我想说出来":技术辅助下儿童性虐待受害者延迟披露的理由
背景受害者披露信息对于揭露和预防儿童性虐待至关重要,但许多受害者不愿披露信息。尽管有关儿童性虐待的研究已经确定了一系列披露的障碍和促进因素,但技术辅助儿童性虐待(TA-CSA)的披露过程在很大程度上还未被探索。参与者和环境对七名年轻女性(受虐时年龄为 7-13 岁,受访时年龄为 17-24 岁)进行了访谈,了解她们在披露信息时所面临的障碍,以及有助于她们更早披露信息的潜在促进因素。害怕谁会发现 "体现了害怕向一个人披露会超出最初披露的范围。需要线索反映了参与者缺乏知识,需要别人邀请他们谈论性和虐待。害怕这是我的错 "表达了参与者的负罪感,以及他们希望了解自己并无过错。对 TA-CSA 的了解和对该主题的邀请被视为潜在的促进因素。从访谈中归纳出了社会和成人世界应优先考虑的四个促进披露的因素:就敏感话题进行公开对话、提供讲述的机会、让儿童掌控故事、解除羞耻感和自责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Population attributable fractions of adolescent health and well-being outcomes associated with adverse childhood experiences in a provincially representative sample in Ontario, Canada Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Bidirectional associations between well-being at school, psychosocial problems and PTSS in children exposed to family violence Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1