Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104529
Kibeom Lee , Reinout E. de Vries , Michael C. Ashton
{"title":"Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types","authors":"Kibeom Lee ,&nbsp;Reinout E. de Vries ,&nbsp;Michael C. Ashton","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined two forms of self/observer agreement (correlational and mean-level) in personality using a Dutch university student sample (<em>N</em>=5,405) with self-reports and observer (informant) reports from parents, siblings, friends, and partners/spouses. Correlational self/observer agreement was strong across all HEXACO-PI-R scales and across relationship types (<span><math><mrow><mover><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>¯</mo></mrow></mover></mrow></math></span> ≥ 0.59, but highest for partners). Regarding mean-level self/observer agreement, alleged positive bias in self-reports was not observed. Only Openness showed higher means for self-reports than for observer reports across all relationship types (<em>d</em> = 0.37). Mean observer report scores varied by relationship: people perceived their children as more honest and less anxious and perceived their siblings as less agreeable than other observers did. Partner reports showed the closest mean-level agreement with self-reports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 104529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771/pdfft?md5=b35202e898398e84438eb6c24081322c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000771-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined two forms of self/observer agreement (correlational and mean-level) in personality using a Dutch university student sample (N=5,405) with self-reports and observer (informant) reports from parents, siblings, friends, and partners/spouses. Correlational self/observer agreement was strong across all HEXACO-PI-R scales and across relationship types (r¯ ≥ 0.59, but highest for partners). Regarding mean-level self/observer agreement, alleged positive bias in self-reports was not observed. Only Openness showed higher means for self-reports than for observer reports across all relationship types (d = 0.37). Mean observer report scores varied by relationship: people perceived their children as more honest and less anxious and perceived their siblings as less agreeable than other observers did. Partner reports showed the closest mean-level agreement with self-reports.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察者关系类型对人格评估中自我/观察者一致性的影响
我们使用荷兰大学生样本(样本数=5,405),通过自我报告和来自父母、兄弟姐妹、朋友和伴侣/配偶的观察者(信息提供者)报告,研究了人格中自我/观察者一致性的两种形式(相关性和平均水平)。在所有 HEXACO-PI-R 量表和各种关系类型中,自我/观察者的相关一致性都很强(r¯ ≥ 0.59,但伴侣的相关一致性最高)。在平均水平的自我/观察者一致性方面,没有观察到自我报告中的所谓正偏差。在所有关系类型中,只有开放性的自我报告平均值高于观察者报告平均值(d = 0.37)。观察者报告的平均分因关系而异:与其他观察者相比,人们认为子女更诚实、更不焦虑,认为兄弟姐妹更不合群。伴侣报告与自我报告的平均水平最接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Why does Creativity Foster Well-Being? Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness during Everyday Creative Activities Comparability of personality facets between men and women: A test of measurement invariance in IPIP-NEO facets in 49 countries The dynamic relationship between state extraversion and the subjectively perceived situational sociality in continuous time “High empathic response but low interest”: Machiavellianism and its neurostructural basis relate to perceived risk of social exclusion and workplace deviance Incremental relations between self-understanding and social functioning beyond personality traits in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1