Assessing the impact of driving behaviors and traffic conflicts on vehicle emissions at non-signalized intersections using a trajectory-based computational framework

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2024.103985
Yizeng Wang , Hao Chai , Zhipeng Zhang , Xiaoqing Zeng , Hao Hu
{"title":"Assessing the impact of driving behaviors and traffic conflicts on vehicle emissions at non-signalized intersections using a trajectory-based computational framework","authors":"Yizeng Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Chai ,&nbsp;Zhipeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Zeng ,&nbsp;Hao Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2024.103985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vehicle emissions can rise due to traffic conflicts and aggressive driving behaviors, such as frequent acceleration and deceleration. This issue is particularly pronounced at non-signalized intersections with a high proportion of non-motorized vehicles. In this study, we propose a framework that integrates a microscopic vehicle emission model with trajectory data. By utilizing trajectory data collected from a non-signalized intersection in Shanghai, we analyzed vehicle emissions linked to driving behaviors and traffic conflicts. Our findings reveal that pre-braking at the entrance of non-signalized intersections can significantly reduce vehicle emissions, lowering them by nearly 80 % for straight maneuvers. However, this reduction is less substantial for turning maneuvers. Additionally, conflicts involving more than two types of targets lead to a significant increase in vehicle emissions. On average, stop-and-go emissions are 1.13 % higher than those resulting from traffic conflicts. Interestingly, when non-motorized vehicles constitute more than 80 % of the traffic volume, stop-and-go emissions fall below those generated by traffic conflicts. The results of this study provide valuable insights for optimizing eco-driving strategies and advancing towards a low-carbon transportation system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 103985"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824003813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vehicle emissions can rise due to traffic conflicts and aggressive driving behaviors, such as frequent acceleration and deceleration. This issue is particularly pronounced at non-signalized intersections with a high proportion of non-motorized vehicles. In this study, we propose a framework that integrates a microscopic vehicle emission model with trajectory data. By utilizing trajectory data collected from a non-signalized intersection in Shanghai, we analyzed vehicle emissions linked to driving behaviors and traffic conflicts. Our findings reveal that pre-braking at the entrance of non-signalized intersections can significantly reduce vehicle emissions, lowering them by nearly 80 % for straight maneuvers. However, this reduction is less substantial for turning maneuvers. Additionally, conflicts involving more than two types of targets lead to a significant increase in vehicle emissions. On average, stop-and-go emissions are 1.13 % higher than those resulting from traffic conflicts. Interestingly, when non-motorized vehicles constitute more than 80 % of the traffic volume, stop-and-go emissions fall below those generated by traffic conflicts. The results of this study provide valuable insights for optimizing eco-driving strategies and advancing towards a low-carbon transportation system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于轨迹的计算框架,评估驾驶行为和交通冲突对非信号灯路口车辆排放的影响
由于交通冲突和激烈驾驶行为(如频繁加速和减速),汽车尾气排放可能会增加。这一问题在非机动车比例较高的非信号交叉路口尤为突出。在本研究中,我们提出了一个将微观车辆排放模型与轨迹数据相结合的框架。通过利用从上海一个非信号灯路口收集到的轨迹数据,我们分析了与驾驶行为和交通冲突相关的车辆排放。我们的研究结果表明,在非信号灯路口入口处预制动能显著减少车辆排放,直线行驶时可减少近 80% 的排放。然而,对于转弯机动来说,这种减少效果并不明显。此外,涉及两种以上目标的冲突也会导致车辆排放量大幅增加。平均而言,走走停停造成的排放量比交通冲突造成的排放量高 1.13%。有趣的是,当非机动车占交通流量的 80% 以上时,即停即走的排放量低于交通冲突产生的排放量。这项研究的结果为优化生态驾驶战略和推进低碳交通系统提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
期刊最新文献
Designing an integrative strategy to introduce electric vehicles in the tourism sector in an outermost region of the European Union Advances in smart cities with system integration and energy digitalization technologies: A state-of-the-art review Building-integrated passive and renewable solar technologies: A review from 3E perspectives Ceramic Air-to-Air Recuperator for energy recovery in HVAC systems: CFD analysis and comparison with experimental tests Day-ahead energy management in green microgrids: Impact of long-term scheduling of hydrogen storage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1