A Team-Based American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Competition Improves Exam Performance

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.021
{"title":"A Team-Based American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Competition Improves Exam Performance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is an important factor in general surgery resident career development. The use of practice question banks for ABSITE preparation improves exam scores and completing more practice questions results in higher scores. The objective of this study is to describe the design of a novel, team-based ABSITE competition implemented into our residency program and analyze its effect on exam performance.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>For the 2023 to 2024 academic year (AY), residents were randomly sorted into teams. The number of TrueLearn (TL) practice questions completed by each team during the 6-month period preceding the 2024 ABSITE was monitored at regular intervals. Paired sample t-test was used to compare total questions completed and ABSITE percent scores from the prior AY. Simple linear regression was performed to determine if total completed questions predicted ABSITE percent scores, and if the change in total completed questions predicted a change in ABSITE percent scores for unique residents.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>University-affiliated general surgery residency program.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>About 34 clinical and research general surgery residents.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Mean total TL questions completed per resident increased by 175.2, with a difference trending toward statistical significance (1037.9 ± 583.6 vs 1213.1 ± 596.0, p = 0.08). Mean ABSITE percent scores significantly increased by 4.6% (68.2 ± 8.7 vs 72.8 ± 5.7, p &lt; 0.001). Total completed questions positively correlated with ABSITE percent scores (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21, F (1,66) = 17.04, p &lt; 0.001). Among individual residents, completing more questions than the prior AY predicted improvement in ABSITE percent scores (R<sup>2</sup> =.18, F (1,32) = 7.02, p = 0.01). Our model predicts that by completing 300 additional practice questions (e.g. 10 more questions/day for 1 month) a resident's ABSITE percent score will increase by 4.8 percentage points.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Implementation of a team-based ABSITE competition is a straightforward and effective intervention that increases general surgery resident question bank utilization and significantly improves ABSITE percent scores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004033/pdfft?md5=178ad17562914ae58596518e936db607&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424004033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is an important factor in general surgery resident career development. The use of practice question banks for ABSITE preparation improves exam scores and completing more practice questions results in higher scores. The objective of this study is to describe the design of a novel, team-based ABSITE competition implemented into our residency program and analyze its effect on exam performance.

DESIGN

For the 2023 to 2024 academic year (AY), residents were randomly sorted into teams. The number of TrueLearn (TL) practice questions completed by each team during the 6-month period preceding the 2024 ABSITE was monitored at regular intervals. Paired sample t-test was used to compare total questions completed and ABSITE percent scores from the prior AY. Simple linear regression was performed to determine if total completed questions predicted ABSITE percent scores, and if the change in total completed questions predicted a change in ABSITE percent scores for unique residents.

SETTING

University-affiliated general surgery residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

About 34 clinical and research general surgery residents.

RESULTS

Mean total TL questions completed per resident increased by 175.2, with a difference trending toward statistical significance (1037.9 ± 583.6 vs 1213.1 ± 596.0, p = 0.08). Mean ABSITE percent scores significantly increased by 4.6% (68.2 ± 8.7 vs 72.8 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Total completed questions positively correlated with ABSITE percent scores (R2 = 0.21, F (1,66) = 17.04, p < 0.001). Among individual residents, completing more questions than the prior AY predicted improvement in ABSITE percent scores (R2 =.18, F (1,32) = 7.02, p = 0.01). Our model predicts that by completing 300 additional practice questions (e.g. 10 more questions/day for 1 month) a resident's ABSITE percent score will increase by 4.8 percentage points.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a team-based ABSITE competition is a straightforward and effective intervention that increases general surgery resident question bank utilization and significantly improves ABSITE percent scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于团队的美国外科学委员会在职培训考试 (ABSITE) 竞赛可提高考试成绩
目的美国外科住院医师培训考试(ABSITE)是普外科住院医师职业发展的一个重要因素。使用练习题库备考 ABSITE 可提高考试分数,完成更多练习题可获得更高分。本研究的目的是描述一种新颖的、以团队为基础的 ABSITE 竞赛的设计,并分析其对考试成绩的影响。在 2024 年 ABSITE 考试之前的 6 个月期间,定期监测每个团队完成 TrueLearn(TL)练习题的数量。使用配对样本 t 检验比较上一学年完成的总问题数和 ABSITE 百分比得分。结果每位住院医师平均完成的 TL 问题总数增加了 175.2 个,差异趋于统计学意义(1037.9 ± 583.6 vs 1213.1 ± 596.0,p = 0.08)。平均 ABSITE 百分比得分显著提高了 4.6% (68.2 ± 8.7 vs 72.8 ± 5.7, p < 0.001)。完成问题总数与 ABSITE 百分比得分呈正相关(R2 = 0.21,F (1,66) = 17.04,p < 0.001)。在住院医师个人中,比前一年完成更多问题可预测 ABSITE 百分比得分的提高(R2 =.18,F (1,32) = 7.02,p = 0.01)。我们的模型预测,多完成 300 道练习题(例如,1 个月内每天多完成 10 道题),住院医师的 ABSITE 百分比得分将提高 4.8 个百分点。结论实施基于团队的 ABSITE 竞赛是一项直接有效的干预措施,可提高普外科住院医师题库的利用率,并显著提高 ABSITE 百分比得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
期刊最新文献
Resident-Applicant Buddy Program Increases Applicant Interest and Program Transparency Promoting Surgical Resident Well-being Through Therapist-Facilitated Discussion Groups: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Geographic Match Location Patterns: Comparison of Pre and Post Virtual Interviews General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day Implementation and Evaluation of an Academic Development Rotation for Surgery Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1