Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103864
Melanie Zurba , Sandie Suchet-Pearson , Ryan Bullock , Ameyali Ramos Castillo , Kevin Chang , Ricky Archer , Eli Enns , Pasang Dolma Sherpa , Ramiro Batzin , Osvaldo Munguia , Anastasia Papadopoulos , Bryanne Lamoureux , Charlotte Greenlees , Melika Habibi , Ahmad Hameed , Richie Howitt
{"title":"Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums","authors":"Melanie Zurba ,&nbsp;Sandie Suchet-Pearson ,&nbsp;Ryan Bullock ,&nbsp;Ameyali Ramos Castillo ,&nbsp;Kevin Chang ,&nbsp;Ricky Archer ,&nbsp;Eli Enns ,&nbsp;Pasang Dolma Sherpa ,&nbsp;Ramiro Batzin ,&nbsp;Osvaldo Munguia ,&nbsp;Anastasia Papadopoulos ,&nbsp;Bryanne Lamoureux ,&nbsp;Charlotte Greenlees ,&nbsp;Melika Habibi ,&nbsp;Ahmad Hameed ,&nbsp;Richie Howitt","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is the first global empirical study that specifically explores the perspectives of Indigenous peoples, people working for Indigenous Peoples’ Organisations (IPOs) and people working in other relevant roles (e.g., conveners of large environmental NGOs) on the barriers to meaningful and effective participation in global environmental governance forums. A total of 30 key informant participants were interviewed for this study. Participants were invited based on their engagement with and/or their interest in Indigenous participation and leadership related to environmental governance. Inductive analysis of the interview data revealed that ‘capacity barriers’, ‘representation, grouping and disconnect’, ‘inclusion and exclusion’, and ‘insights for how to proceed in the future’ to be important primary themes for discussion. Secondary themes were also determined for each primary theme to highlight the key issues and to develop implications and recommendations for enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international governance forums.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103864"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the first global empirical study that specifically explores the perspectives of Indigenous peoples, people working for Indigenous Peoples’ Organisations (IPOs) and people working in other relevant roles (e.g., conveners of large environmental NGOs) on the barriers to meaningful and effective participation in global environmental governance forums. A total of 30 key informant participants were interviewed for this study. Participants were invited based on their engagement with and/or their interest in Indigenous participation and leadership related to environmental governance. Inductive analysis of the interview data revealed that ‘capacity barriers’, ‘representation, grouping and disconnect’, ‘inclusion and exclusion’, and ‘insights for how to proceed in the future’ to be important primary themes for discussion. Secondary themes were also determined for each primary theme to highlight the key issues and to develop implications and recommendations for enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international governance forums.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强土著人民在国际环境治理论坛上有意义的领导和合作
这是第一项全球性实证研究,专门探讨土著人民、土著人民组织 (IPO) 工作人员和其他相关人员(如大型非政府环境组织召集人)对有意义和有效参与全球环境治理论坛的障碍的看法。本研究共采访了 30 位关键信息提供者。受访者是根据其参与和/或对土著参与环境治理和领导力的兴趣而被邀请的。对访谈数据的归纳分析表明,"能力障碍"、"代表性、分组和脱节"、"包容和排斥 "以及 "对未来如何开展工作的见解 "是重要的主要讨论主题。还为每个主要专题确定了次要专题,以突出关键问题,并为加强土著人在国际治理论坛中的有意义的领导和合作提出影响和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Forest owners’ perceptions of machine learning: Insights from swedish forestry Understanding how landscape value and climate risk discourses can improve adaptation planning: Insights from Q-method Articulating futures: Community storylines and assisted ecosystem adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef Insights into the public engagement of coastal geoscientists Flood data platform governance: Identifying the technological and socio-technical approach(es) differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1