METHODS: Validating an immunoassay to measure fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in yellow-bellied marmots

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111738
{"title":"METHODS: Validating an immunoassay to measure fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in yellow-bellied marmots","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantifying physiological stress in wild animals is essential for understanding their health, reproductive success, and survival in a variable environment. The yellow-bellied marmot (<em>Marmota flaviventer</em>) study at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory near Crested Butte, Colorado, USA is the world's second longest study of free-living mammals. Historically, we used a validated corticosterone radioimmunoassay (RIA) to measure fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) as a proxy for physiological stress. However, the costs and risks associated with working with radioisotopes drove us to consider a more sustainable method. Here we evaluate the suitability of two competitive corticosterone enzyme assays (EIA), one from Cayman Chemical Company (CCC) and one from Arbor Assays (AA), to measure marmot FGMs via their cross-reaction. The findings revealed that the AA EIA better matched the RIA in terms of accuracy across high and low FGM concentrations, had superior assay parameters, showed the highest correlations with RIA results and effectively captured the annual variations in FGM concentrations, thus demonstrating its reliability for use in longitudinal studies. We further analytically validated the AA EIA for FGMs and confirmed its efficacy and lack of matrix effects, thus establishing its suitability for ongoing and future studies of FGMs in marmots. The transition to the AA EIA from the RIA ensures continued data integrity while enhancing safety and environmental sustainability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55237,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109564332400165X/pdfft?md5=e4595b8bc48b5f5007a203a0ffb3aea8&pid=1-s2.0-S109564332400165X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109564332400165X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying physiological stress in wild animals is essential for understanding their health, reproductive success, and survival in a variable environment. The yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventer) study at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory near Crested Butte, Colorado, USA is the world's second longest study of free-living mammals. Historically, we used a validated corticosterone radioimmunoassay (RIA) to measure fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) as a proxy for physiological stress. However, the costs and risks associated with working with radioisotopes drove us to consider a more sustainable method. Here we evaluate the suitability of two competitive corticosterone enzyme assays (EIA), one from Cayman Chemical Company (CCC) and one from Arbor Assays (AA), to measure marmot FGMs via their cross-reaction. The findings revealed that the AA EIA better matched the RIA in terms of accuracy across high and low FGM concentrations, had superior assay parameters, showed the highest correlations with RIA results and effectively captured the annual variations in FGM concentrations, thus demonstrating its reliability for use in longitudinal studies. We further analytically validated the AA EIA for FGMs and confirmed its efficacy and lack of matrix effects, thus establishing its suitability for ongoing and future studies of FGMs in marmots. The transition to the AA EIA from the RIA ensures continued data integrity while enhancing safety and environmental sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方法:验证测量黄腹旱獭粪便糖皮质激素代谢物的免疫测定法
量化野生动物的生理压力对于了解它们的健康状况、繁殖成功率以及在多变环境中的生存能力至关重要。在美国科罗拉多州克雷斯特布特附近的落基山生物实验室进行的黄腹旱獭(Marmota flaviventer)研究是世界上时间第二长的自由生活哺乳动物研究。一直以来,我们使用经过验证的皮质酮放射免疫测定法(RIA)来测量粪便中的糖皮质激素代谢物(FGMs),作为生理应激的替代指标。然而,与放射性同位素相关的成本和风险促使我们考虑一种更可持续的方法。在这里,我们评估了两种竞争性皮质酮酶测定法(EIA)的适用性,一种是开曼化学公司(CCC)的,另一种是 Arbor Assays 公司(AA)的,通过它们的交叉反应来测定旱獭的 FGMs。研究结果表明,AA EIA 在高浓度和低浓度 FGM 的准确性方面与 RIA 更为匹配,具有更优越的检测参数,与 RIA 结果的相关性最高,并能有效捕捉 FGM 浓度的年度变化,从而证明了其在纵向研究中使用的可靠性。我们进一步对 AA EIA 进行了分析验证,确认了其对脱硫剂的有效性和无基质效应,从而确定了其适用于正在进行的和未来的旱獭脱硫剂研究。从 RIA 过渡到 AA EIA 可确保持续的数据完整性,同时提高安全性和环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology of Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. This journal covers molecular, cellular, integrative, and ecological physiology. Topics include bioenergetics, circulation, development, excretion, ion regulation, endocrinology, neurobiology, nutrition, respiration, and thermal biology. Study on regulatory mechanisms at any level of organization such as signal transduction and cellular interaction and control of behavior are also published.
期刊最新文献
Characterization and functional analysis of Litopenaeus vannamei Na+/K+/2Cl− cotransporter 1 under nitrite stress Commentary: Best practices for performing olfactory behavioral assays on aquatic animals: A guide for comparative physiologists Haemolysis overestimates plasma oxidative stress biomarkers in a free-ranging mammal: The case of roe deer. Inferring the metabolic rate of bone Evolution of the thirst mechanism in Homo: The need and limitations of thirst and hydration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1