Investigating the effect of auditory takeover request signals frequency on drivers from an acute stress perspective

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.008
Xintao Hu, Jing Hu
{"title":"Investigating the effect of auditory takeover request signals frequency on drivers from an acute stress perspective","authors":"Xintao Hu,&nbsp;Jing Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the effect of auditory displays, which are typically used as takeover signals in highly automated driving, on drivers during emergencies. Acute stress was assessed by analyzing physiological features within 10 s post-stimulation, in particular the root mean square of successive differences, raw-skin conductance, and low-frequency/high-frequency ratio. Sixteen participants were recruited to perform autopilot tasks in a simulated cockpit. Acute stress was induced using three sets of beeps with inter-pulse intervals of 0.2, 0.5, and 1 s, which serve as the auditory takeover request (TOR). The participants were required to immediately initiate vehicle takeovers and perform lane-changing maneuvers following each TOR, and their physiological, psychological, and behavioral data were acquired for analysis. The results show that the relationship between acute stress and signal frequency conforms to Stevens’ power law, thus highlighting the significance of the signal frequency with respect to acute stress. Although correlations are observed between perceived urgency and acute stress, the acute stress does not correlate significantly with the takeover parameters, such as the takeover time, information-processing time, and steering wheel speed. This study provides valuable insights into the effects of TORs on drivers in terms of acute stress, thus contributing to enhanced driving safety and guiding the design of auditory TORs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 424-435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the effect of auditory displays, which are typically used as takeover signals in highly automated driving, on drivers during emergencies. Acute stress was assessed by analyzing physiological features within 10 s post-stimulation, in particular the root mean square of successive differences, raw-skin conductance, and low-frequency/high-frequency ratio. Sixteen participants were recruited to perform autopilot tasks in a simulated cockpit. Acute stress was induced using three sets of beeps with inter-pulse intervals of 0.2, 0.5, and 1 s, which serve as the auditory takeover request (TOR). The participants were required to immediately initiate vehicle takeovers and perform lane-changing maneuvers following each TOR, and their physiological, psychological, and behavioral data were acquired for analysis. The results show that the relationship between acute stress and signal frequency conforms to Stevens’ power law, thus highlighting the significance of the signal frequency with respect to acute stress. Although correlations are observed between perceived urgency and acute stress, the acute stress does not correlate significantly with the takeover parameters, such as the takeover time, information-processing time, and steering wheel speed. This study provides valuable insights into the effects of TORs on drivers in terms of acute stress, thus contributing to enhanced driving safety and guiding the design of auditory TORs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从急性应激角度研究听觉接管请求信号频率对驾驶员的影响
本研究探讨了在高度自动驾驶中通常用作接管信号的听觉显示对紧急情况下驾驶员的影响。通过分析刺激后 10 秒内的生理特征,特别是连续差值的均方根、原始皮肤电导率和低频/高频比率,对急性压力进行评估。招募了 16 名参与者在模拟驾驶舱中执行自动驾驶任务。使用三组脉冲间隔分别为 0.2 秒、0.5 秒和 1 秒的蜂鸣声作为听觉接管请求(TOR),诱发急性压力。参与者需要在每次 TOR 后立即启动车辆接管并进行变道操作,并获取他们的生理、心理和行为数据进行分析。结果表明,急性压力与信号频率之间的关系符合史蒂文斯的幂律,从而突出了信号频率对急性压力的重要性。虽然感知紧迫性与急性应激之间存在相关性,但急性应激与接管参数(如接管时间、信息处理时间和方向盘速度)并无显著相关性。这项研究就急性应激对驾驶员的影响提供了有价值的见解,从而有助于提高驾驶安全性,并为听觉式 TOR 的设计提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding car-sharing by integrating long-, medium- and short-term cognitions High-speed curve negotiation: Can differences in expertise account for the different effects of cognitive load? Description and analysis of aberrant riding behaviors of pedal cyclists, e-bike riders and motorcyclists: Based on a self-report questionnaire The role of emotional coherence in electric vehicle purchasing decisions Incorporating personality traits for the study of user acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1