Huimin Zhuang , Zhao Zhang , Jichong Han , Fei Cheng , Shaokun Li , Huaqing Wu , Qinghang Mei , Jie Song , Xinyu Wu , Zongliang Zhang , Jialu Xu
{"title":"Stagnating rice yields in China need to be overcome by cultivars and management improvements","authors":"Huimin Zhuang , Zhao Zhang , Jichong Han , Fei Cheng , Shaokun Li , Huaqing Wu , Qinghang Mei , Jie Song , Xinyu Wu , Zongliang Zhang , Jialu Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Understanding the dynamics of potential yields, actual yields, and their drivers is vital for developing sustainable agricultural management practices. Previous studies on rice in China, focusing on either limited experiments, limited driving factors, or short-term periods, reached inconsistent conclusions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We tried to investigate annual dynamics of rice potential yields, actual yields, and their gaps to distinguish the contributions of climate and technology to yield increases in major rice cultivation areas across China.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Herein, using valuable field trials from 1981 to 2018 across 205 agro-meteorological stations and the crop model CERES-Rice, we explored the spatiotemporal trends of rice yields and quantitively separated the contributions of various factors to yield increases across mainland China.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>A contrasting trend in potential yields was observed, with a decline in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River (MLRYR, −22.4 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) and an increase in the Northeastern China Plain (NECP, 20.0 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). Despite varying regional trends, the national yield gap narrowed to 27 % in 2018. Technological advances were the primary drivers (37.3 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>) of yield increases in most areas compared to climate impact (−2.6 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup>). Particularly in the MLRYR, technological improvements have offset the negative impacts of climate change. Cultivars improvement contributed (14 %–22 %) more than water and fertilizer management did in the main rice-producing regions.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Our findings discover the evolving patterns of potential rice yields across China and the underlying drivers, providing scientific evidence for hindering rice yield stagnations by cultivars improvements and field management optimizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104134"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Understanding the dynamics of potential yields, actual yields, and their drivers is vital for developing sustainable agricultural management practices. Previous studies on rice in China, focusing on either limited experiments, limited driving factors, or short-term periods, reached inconsistent conclusions.
OBJECTIVE
We tried to investigate annual dynamics of rice potential yields, actual yields, and their gaps to distinguish the contributions of climate and technology to yield increases in major rice cultivation areas across China.
METHODS
Herein, using valuable field trials from 1981 to 2018 across 205 agro-meteorological stations and the crop model CERES-Rice, we explored the spatiotemporal trends of rice yields and quantitively separated the contributions of various factors to yield increases across mainland China.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
A contrasting trend in potential yields was observed, with a decline in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River (MLRYR, −22.4 kg ha−1 y−1) and an increase in the Northeastern China Plain (NECP, 20.0 kg ha−1 y−1). Despite varying regional trends, the national yield gap narrowed to 27 % in 2018. Technological advances were the primary drivers (37.3 kg ha−1 y−1) of yield increases in most areas compared to climate impact (−2.6 kg ha−1 y−1). Particularly in the MLRYR, technological improvements have offset the negative impacts of climate change. Cultivars improvement contributed (14 %–22 %) more than water and fertilizer management did in the main rice-producing regions.
SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings discover the evolving patterns of potential rice yields across China and the underlying drivers, providing scientific evidence for hindering rice yield stagnations by cultivars improvements and field management optimizations.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.