Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133
Yongbing Feng, Guohua Gao, Pengyu Wang, Zihua Zhang
{"title":"Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems","authors":"Yongbing Feng,&nbsp;Guohua Gao,&nbsp;Pengyu Wang,&nbsp;Zihua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Vertical Farming Systems (VFSs) are considered an evolutionary jump in humanity's quest for a reliable, sustainable and healthier food supply, and their design and implementation require bringing multi-stakeholder together to achieve values co-creation. However, there is a lack of the qualitative and quantitative analysis from the perspective of multi-stakeholder's value exchange to explain the complex need relationships among related VFSs and their multi-stakeholder and a lack of the research on VFSs needs (VFSs-N) from the strategic issues view to consider the balance of conflicting needs.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To transform stakeholder needs into stakeholder requirements and capture the comprehensive and consistent VFSs requirements (VFSs-R) list.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>This paper proposes an approach integrating stakeholder value network (SVN) and strategic issue management (SIM). This study offers a systematic framework to get a VFSs-R list. The SVN is employed for structuring a four-step needs analysis process and viewing multi-stakeholder direct and indirect need relationships as value exchanges for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Integration of stakeholder relationships and SIM is presented to reveal additional insights into the balance of conflicting VFSs-N and reduce the dimensionality of the complex relationships in SVN by issue networks (IN). In addition, based on the above analysis results, needs-to-requirements transformation can be achieved by adding identity (ID), name, description, and rationale.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>When the framework was applied to the multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of the Robotic Vertical Farming Systems (RVFS) project. We can get 52 needs including 3 conflicting needs and eventually analyse and balance the needs to get a RVFS-R list of 13 well-formed and prioritized requirements.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>These research results can help the designer identify the relatively more important requirements, whether direct or indirect, and assist the VFSs projects achieve value co-creation among stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104133"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2400283X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Vertical Farming Systems (VFSs) are considered an evolutionary jump in humanity's quest for a reliable, sustainable and healthier food supply, and their design and implementation require bringing multi-stakeholder together to achieve values co-creation. However, there is a lack of the qualitative and quantitative analysis from the perspective of multi-stakeholder's value exchange to explain the complex need relationships among related VFSs and their multi-stakeholder and a lack of the research on VFSs needs (VFSs-N) from the strategic issues view to consider the balance of conflicting needs.

OBJECTIVE

To transform stakeholder needs into stakeholder requirements and capture the comprehensive and consistent VFSs requirements (VFSs-R) list.

METHODS

This paper proposes an approach integrating stakeholder value network (SVN) and strategic issue management (SIM). This study offers a systematic framework to get a VFSs-R list. The SVN is employed for structuring a four-step needs analysis process and viewing multi-stakeholder direct and indirect need relationships as value exchanges for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Integration of stakeholder relationships and SIM is presented to reveal additional insights into the balance of conflicting VFSs-N and reduce the dimensionality of the complex relationships in SVN by issue networks (IN). In addition, based on the above analysis results, needs-to-requirements transformation can be achieved by adding identity (ID), name, description, and rationale.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

When the framework was applied to the multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of the Robotic Vertical Farming Systems (RVFS) project. We can get 52 needs including 3 conflicting needs and eventually analyse and balance the needs to get a RVFS-R list of 13 well-formed and prioritized requirements.

SIGNIFICANCE

These research results can help the designer identify the relatively more important requirements, whether direct or indirect, and assist the VFSs projects achieve value co-creation among stakeholders.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将利益相关者价值网络与战略问题管理相结合,对垂直耕作系统进行多方利益相关者需求分析
内容提要垂直耕作系统(VFSs)被认为是人类追求可靠、可持续和更健康的食品供应过程中的一次进化,其设计和实施需要将多方利益相关者聚集在一起,实现价值共创。然而,目前还缺乏从多方利益相关者价值交换的角度进行定性和定量分析,以解释相关 VFS 及其多方利益相关者之间复杂的需求关系;也缺乏从战略问题的角度对 VFS 需求(VFSs-N)进行研究,以考虑相互冲突的需求之间的平衡。目标将利益相关者的需求转化为利益相关者的要求,并获取全面一致的 VFSs 要求(VFSs-R)清单。方法本文提出了一种整合利益相关者价值网络(SVN)和战略问题管理(SIM)的方法。本研究提供了一个获取 VFSs-R 列表的系统框架。SVN 用于构建四步需求分析流程,并将多方利益相关者的直接和间接需求关系视为价值交换,以便进行定性和定量分析。将利益相关者关系和 SIM 整合在一起,可揭示冲突的 VFSs-N 平衡的更多内涵,并通过问题网络(IN)降低 SVN 中复杂关系的维度。此外,基于上述分析结果,还可以通过添加身份(ID)、名称、描述和理由来实现需求到需求的转化。这些研究成果可以帮助设计者识别相对更重要的需求,无论是直接需求还是间接需求,并帮助垂直农业系统项目实现利益相关者之间的价值共创。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Lowering the greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from grassland-based dairy production The dairy production system in the north of Sweden under possible future food scenarios A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics How to use residual biomass streams in circular food systems to minimise land use or GHG emissions Win-win or lose-win? Economic-climatic synergies and trade-offs in dual-purpose cattle systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1