Decellularized adipose-derived matrix from Superficial layers of abdominal adipose tissue exhibits superior capacity of adipogenesis compared to deep layers
Xiaomu Ma , Qiang Yue , Su Fu, Chunjun Liu , Jie Luan
{"title":"Decellularized adipose-derived matrix from Superficial layers of abdominal adipose tissue exhibits superior capacity of adipogenesis compared to deep layers","authors":"Xiaomu Ma , Qiang Yue , Su Fu, Chunjun Liu , Jie Luan","doi":"10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adipogenic property of decellularized adipose-derived matrix (DAM) varies widely across reports, making it difficult to make a horizontal comparison between reports and posing challenges for the stable clinical translation of DAM. It is possibly due to differences in donor characteristics, but the exact relationship remains unclear. Despite extensive research on the differences between superficial and deep layers of abdominal subcutaneous fat, a main donor of DAM, little is known about their extracellular matrix (ECM) which is promising in regenerative medicine. In this study, we first confirmed the distinct compositional profiles and adipogenic potential between superficial and deep DAM (S-DAM and D-DAM). Both in vitro and in vivo assays confirmed superior adipogenic induction potential in S-DAM over D-DAM. Total amounts of ECM proteins like collagen and laminin were similar, however, the predominant types differed, with collagen I dominating S-DAM and collagen XIV prevailing in D-DAM. S-DAM was enriched with mitochondrial and immunological proteins, whereas D-DAM featured more neuronal, vascular, muscular, and endocrine-related proteins. More proteins involved in mRNA processing were found in D-DAM, with Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis revealing HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPA1, and HNRNPC as the most tightly interacting members. These findings not only deepen our comprehension of the structural and functional heterogeneity of adipose tissues but also become one of the reason for the large variability between batches of DAM products, providing guidance for constructing more efficient and stable bio-scaffolds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18310,"journal":{"name":"Materials Today Bio","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101235"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006424002965/pdfft?md5=a87afc1211964ece3544b154f2dbd0bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2590006424002965-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Today Bio","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590006424002965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The adipogenic property of decellularized adipose-derived matrix (DAM) varies widely across reports, making it difficult to make a horizontal comparison between reports and posing challenges for the stable clinical translation of DAM. It is possibly due to differences in donor characteristics, but the exact relationship remains unclear. Despite extensive research on the differences between superficial and deep layers of abdominal subcutaneous fat, a main donor of DAM, little is known about their extracellular matrix (ECM) which is promising in regenerative medicine. In this study, we first confirmed the distinct compositional profiles and adipogenic potential between superficial and deep DAM (S-DAM and D-DAM). Both in vitro and in vivo assays confirmed superior adipogenic induction potential in S-DAM over D-DAM. Total amounts of ECM proteins like collagen and laminin were similar, however, the predominant types differed, with collagen I dominating S-DAM and collagen XIV prevailing in D-DAM. S-DAM was enriched with mitochondrial and immunological proteins, whereas D-DAM featured more neuronal, vascular, muscular, and endocrine-related proteins. More proteins involved in mRNA processing were found in D-DAM, with Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis revealing HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPA1, and HNRNPC as the most tightly interacting members. These findings not only deepen our comprehension of the structural and functional heterogeneity of adipose tissues but also become one of the reason for the large variability between batches of DAM products, providing guidance for constructing more efficient and stable bio-scaffolds.
期刊介绍:
Materials Today Bio is a multidisciplinary journal that specializes in the intersection between biology and materials science, chemistry, physics, engineering, and medicine. It covers various aspects such as the design and assembly of new structures, their interaction with biological systems, functionalization, bioimaging, therapies, and diagnostics in healthcare. The journal aims to showcase the most significant advancements and discoveries in this field. As part of the Materials Today family, Materials Today Bio provides rigorous peer review, quick decision-making, and high visibility for authors. It is indexed in Scopus, PubMed Central, Emerging Sources, Citation Index (ESCI), and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).