Potential objects and transitivity variations: A comparable corpus-driven study of Mandarin Chinese Verb-Object compounds

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Lingua Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103814
Menghan Jiang , Chu-Ren Huang
{"title":"Potential objects and transitivity variations: A comparable corpus-driven study of Mandarin Chinese Verb-Object compounds","authors":"Menghan Jiang ,&nbsp;Chu-Ren Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study proposes a new approach to the transitivity variation of the Mandarin Verb-Object (VO) compound by focusing on the role of the potential objects instead of the incorporated object. This new approach highlights the interactions between language change and variation. Previous approaches to the transitivity variation of VO compounds, especially Mandarin Chinese VO compounds, have typically focused on the purported blocking effect of the incorporated object (O). Recent corpus-driven studies, however, have attested that Mandarin VO compounds can take objects. This study compared clausal contexts in two Chinese varieties when VO compounds take direct objects and showed that the same noun phrase tends to require a context of higher transitivity to function as a direct object in the Mainland variety, complementing the previously established tendencies that Taiwan Verb-Object compounds have higher object-taking abilities. Both changes and variations can be interpreted as lexical constructionalization, supplemented with insights from noun incorporation and lexical diffusion. Argument advancement after compound formation represents lexical constructionalization, motivated by a tendency to encode transitivity with less compositionality. The contrasting contextual and lexical transitivity trends in the two varieties support the shifting encoding of transitivity generalization, illustrating different stages of lexical constructionalization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124001451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a new approach to the transitivity variation of the Mandarin Verb-Object (VO) compound by focusing on the role of the potential objects instead of the incorporated object. This new approach highlights the interactions between language change and variation. Previous approaches to the transitivity variation of VO compounds, especially Mandarin Chinese VO compounds, have typically focused on the purported blocking effect of the incorporated object (O). Recent corpus-driven studies, however, have attested that Mandarin VO compounds can take objects. This study compared clausal contexts in two Chinese varieties when VO compounds take direct objects and showed that the same noun phrase tends to require a context of higher transitivity to function as a direct object in the Mainland variety, complementing the previously established tendencies that Taiwan Verb-Object compounds have higher object-taking abilities. Both changes and variations can be interpreted as lexical constructionalization, supplemented with insights from noun incorporation and lexical diffusion. Argument advancement after compound formation represents lexical constructionalization, motivated by a tendency to encode transitivity with less compositionality. The contrasting contextual and lexical transitivity trends in the two varieties support the shifting encoding of transitivity generalization, illustrating different stages of lexical constructionalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潜在宾语和反义变化:由语料库驱动的普通话动宾复合词对比研究
本研究针对普通话动词-宾语(VO)复合词的转换性变异提出了一种新方法,即关注潜在宾语的作用,而不是纳入宾语的作用。这种新方法突出了语言变化和变异之间的相互作用。以往研究 VO 化合物(尤其是汉语普通话 VO 化合物)转换性变异的方法,一般都集中在所称的并入宾语(O)的阻断作用上。然而,最近由语料库驱动的研究证明,普通话 VO 化合物可以带宾语。本研究比较了两个汉语语系中VO复合词直接带宾语的分句语境,结果表明,同一名词短语在大陆语系中往往需要较高转义性的语境才能充当直接宾语,补充了之前台湾动宾复合词带宾语能力较强的既定趋势。这两种变化和变异都可以解释为词汇构词化,并辅以名词融入和词汇扩散的启示。复合词形成后的论据推进代表了词汇构词化,其动机是倾向于用较少的构成性来编码反义性。两个变体在语境和词汇上的反义趋势对比支持反义泛化的编码变化,说明了词汇构词化的不同阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
期刊最新文献
A better or worse communicator? Comparing human and machine translation in source language shining through across registers Towards a system of principles for identifying nominalizing metaphors Diachronic changes in lexical density of research article abstracts: A corpus-based study The role of phonological overlap and cognates in dual logographic bilinguals’ phonological processing Revisiting the connection between progressive aspect and motion event cognition: Evidence from L1 Mandarin Chinese and L2 Swedish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1